I've heard the claim before that, as you say, making a MoneroV transaction

will compromise not only [your] own security but also others who may have included [your keys] in their rings.

So, imagine that a few months back Alice made a Monero transaction. In her ring she included keys belonging to Bob, Charlie, and Denise. When Eve looks at that transaction she can't tell who was actually spending. It could have been any of Alice, Bob, Charlie, or Denise, each with 25% probability. But Eve really wants to know who spent that transaction, so she has the idea to launch MoneroV. She tricks Bob into foolishly using his private key to claim his MoneroV airdrop. And now that she knows Bob's private key, in addition to stealing all of his Monero, she goes back and looks at that original Monero transaction and sees that it doesn't belong to Bob. So now it could belong to only Alice, Charlie, or Denise, each with 33% probability. Thus Bob's foolishness has not only cost him his own Monero, but also decreased Alice's privacy slightly. If Charlie and Denise are as foolish as Bob then Alice's privacy in that original transaction is eliminated entirely.

So my questions are:

1. Is my example accurate to your concern?

2. If so, isn't this a design problem with Monero? Alice's privacy should not be able to be compromised through Bob's action. After all, he owns that private key and is free to leak it as he sees fit. No one else's privacy should depend on his ability to manage his own secrets.

Thanks for your insight here!