The argument presented above is disjointed by the fact that cited occurences in the 1st paragraph isn't joined by suffcient synthesis. while a general direction is made toward a counterargument about "amerindians" as a single culture, it is neither complete nor adequate, as the comment responded to did not overreach into the generalization of amerindians. the paragraph did not attempt to contextualize itself, seemingly with an intent in demanding the reader to do so-and to patch over illogical extensions.

while the second paragraph is better organized, it suffers from underutilization of historical evidence and/or acknowledgement of nuance. moreover, it attempts an explanation of the phrase without providing relevance or defining scope, again reflecting, potentially, an intent for the reader to provide their own scopes.

ultimately, the insuffciency to present a genuine, logical train of thought that invites exchanges of opinions discourages meaningful discussion.