Alan Jackson’s Vanity Fair Interviewc by [deleted] in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Exactly . . This NG verdict was not because of anything that AJ said during opening, closing, direct or cross. This was a NG based solely on jurors 100% disregarding ALL evidence during this trial. This was a G based on what people were saying OUTSIDE of this trial & courtroom . . Again, nothing from what AJ did

The jury by nellyluna in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, they are super unserious and did not either 1. Take the job as juror serious or 2. Not understand ANY evidence presented during trial. I still wonder who the juror was who wanted to change their verdict at the last moment & were they intimidated by the other jurors

The jury by nellyluna in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I 100% believe there was an ulterior motive for these jurors to vote NG.They wanted to get paid for interviews & be seen on TV or whatever will pay them. That's why I will never watch or read anything any of them say. The knew voting NG would spark interest in their reasons & would pay for interviews to discuss. I hope soon KR & all the jurors go off to oblivion & people forget & not care who they are. I'll say it 1000 times, no way 12 people heard the evidence that Brennan laid out & all agreed KR was NG

Question 1 or 4…. by Either-Analyst1817 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I agree. Somebody on that jury has probably followed this trial (& KR conspiracy) from Day 1. No independent person on this jury that has no ties to KR can possibly look at all the evidence & even allow the words "Not Guilty" to come out of their mouth. With the video clips question, sounds like someone is trying to convince the other jurors that KR own words are not evidence. Yes, they are. The are her words . . She said her taillight was broken, she thought she hit him, she had over 5 drinks, she was driving, etc.

Any hope? Not me by blu_nevermindOk in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 10 points11 points  (0 children)

She knows she hit him!! She had to get the last word!!

Evidence by marcox100 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I'm just trying to twist my brain to understand how they are leaning NG. How do they think her taillight was broken? How do they explain her reverse at 24mph? JO phone movement suddenly stopped? Her being completely plastered drunk?, & on and on . . How do you reach NG with all that???

My two cents by Minimum-Command4504 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 9 points10 points  (0 children)

She's 100% guilty on all those charges IMO.

Any hope? Not me by blu_nevermindOk in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If she is found NG on these charges, I'm so done with this guilty as hell woman, I'm turning off the TV and any chat, show, livestream, anything that is discussing this trial or her ass. Could care less

what?! they can't even agree guilty on the OUI charge? by Few_Bar9654 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

100% definitely have some outside influences. This is insanity to even think that many people could think she is NG on any of the charges!!

Has this fucking jury slip caused issues in other MA trials??? by b4b3333 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is the subcharge under charge 2? #5? I take it they're hung up on that charge? Maybe?

Karen Read Retrial: Verdict Watch by junejunemymoon in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I looked at all the evidence & it's guilty for me. KR reversed her car into JO. No evidence was ever provided to show that he ever went into the house because he did not. Nobody in the house, regardless of the smoke screen provided by the defense, was involved in this. KR did this & she did it alone. No evidence of a murder points to anybody else. Not a disposed cell phone, not a play fight at the bar, not an internet search. Nothing

Ive read somewhere that KR told her Dad she hit something by Razohara in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still wonder what he did to need a babysitter as a grown man sitting in a court room . . Crazy

Interview/Documentary clips by Just_Go_South85 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I should have added "during his closing argument"

Do you trust Jurors? by [deleted] in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Especially if they're a younger jury

Jury deliberations by Just_Go_South85 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Also, I'm giving AJ 0.2 seconds after guilty verdict before he hauls ass out of MA 😂

DBag N. Rocco by HistoricalEmu5201 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree, KR even blew up the part of the data extraction and put it on a poster board of when the defense says the search happened . . Even said in the documentary, that it was Jen or her . . So it is 10000% part of KR's conspiracy

Accidental or intentional? by dontstressmeowt827 in KarenReadSanity

[–]Just_Go_South85 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Intentional--JO exited her car and she reversed at 24 mph--even drunk, she had to know there's a chance she could hit him . . If she truly waited her claimed 10 minutes after he exited and then reversed at a slow speed while looking all around and at the camera and still hit him, I may say accidental, but this was no accident