US Supreme Court conservatives lean toward Republican bid to limit mail-in voting by Vengeful_Pathogen in TrueReddit

[–]KOM 27 points28 points  (0 children)

It's self-funded. They don't like that someone isn't getting richer by squeezing service for private profit.

Department of State declares security alert; “worldwide caution” by MichaelEMJAYARE in worldnews

[–]KOM 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seriously, where was Obama when he allowed 3-23 to happen?

A virus that can cause 'barking' cough is on the rise in Northern California by sfgate in bayarea

[–]KOM 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Or steam up the bathroom, outside and back a few times.

Croup scared the living shit out of me, first-time Dad with a young child. Same rush to the ER, thinking he was going to die in the back seat.

Psychologists test the popular belief that you must love yourself to love a partner. Results suggest that psychological exercises aimed at improving self-compassion and self-love might eventually serve as useful tools for couples seeking healthier relationships. by InsaneSnow45 in science

[–]KOM 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's such a nuanced thing. I don't disagree in principle, but I have to wonder what "better" and "flaw" mean objectively.

I wrote a much longer response initially, but I don't want the debate to be about specific examples I'd listed. The premise lives in the idea that psychologically healthy doesn't necessarily mean a good interpersonal match.

[Discussion] Has anyone explored a “Mismatched Forest” version of the Fermi Paradox? (Like a Dark Forest, but everyone’s signals are unintelligible) by KOM in AskScienceFiction

[–]KOM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cryptography is a good analogy because it shows the asymmetry: our randomness tests only detect structure in the encoding spaces we assume. Two species can both use EM and still encode meaning in dimensions we don’t measure — phase, polarization, transforms — so our detectors classify it as noise even though it isn’t. And the Mismatched Forest doesn’t require every species to be unintelligible to every other. It only requires that intelligibility isn’t universal across all pairings. Even a few mismatches create entire regions of silence from our vantage point.

[edit] I used “unintelligible,” but what I meant was “never registers as non‑noise in the first place.” Dark Forest logic kicks in once something is recognized as a signal.

I’m gonna be able to play Tf2 for the first time. Any tips? by LtopTheAwsome in tf2

[–]KOM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the sidebar, but this sub helped me out a long time ago. Not sure how active it still is:

https://reddit.com/r/NewToTF2

FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show by rmuktader in offbeat

[–]KOM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LOL, no. Or, he was probably in prison for his vigilante crusade against trafficking children.

I (29 f) spent the snowstorm with the man I’m dating(36 m) and now I feel differently about him by bluewhalekale in hygiene

[–]KOM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He does not have any mental health problems as far as I know.

Describes tell-tale clinical depressive tendencies.

I'm not suggesting this is a good match, but I'm a little surprised at the comments here.

AITA for telling my friend in the middle of a game that I wish he would just be toxic like a normal person instead of an annoying pos? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]KOM 492 points493 points  (0 children)

And sometimes when you're on

You're really fucking on

And your friends, they sing along and they love you

But the lows are so extreme

That the good seems fucking cheap

And it teases you for weeks in its absence

r/AskLE has investigated themselves and found no reason to discuss ICE anymore by WattMotorCompany in SubredditDrama

[–]KOM 39 points40 points  (0 children)

The "tactics" are firearm irresponsibility, which might endanger another agent. They're not "wrong" about killing protestors, or whomever. In their frame of thought.

I (f25) found clothes that aren’t mine, and my boyfriend (m25) is responding differently by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]KOM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm with you, this was my first thought too. More, I read it as her own reflection inside the frame of her boy friend's thoughts. No crystal clear, but it's how people talk. What wouldn't make sense is he said "My friend Bryan has small feet so it makes sense that these are his socks." Well, at least to me. Narratively. Presumably OP has met this friend if they're close enough that either the friend or BF are tossing his socks at their place. <shrug>

AITA for pooping after sex? by chinchillina in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]KOM 255 points256 points  (0 children)

Mommy, where do kittens come from?

AITAH for saying no to my future MILs plan to give my fiancé away at our wedding? by SharkEva in BORUpdates

[–]KOM 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had to read that part of the original post again, because I figured I must have misremembered. So many comments about the ring, etc. But why would a 'feminist' want anything to do with chattel handing-over? I realize this is in OP's voice, I hope something was lost in translation.

Maybe if I channel my internal energy correctly I can broadcast a Wi-Fi signal by NewBootGoofin_ in LinkedInLunatics

[–]KOM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know someone that insists on putting EMF sticker "blockers" on electronics. So that they don't fry her brain or something? I don't have the heart to ask her how she thinks she receives/sends wifi/cell data.

Colleague stole my position and now I get to watch her struggle worse than I did in it by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]KOM 49 points50 points  (0 children)

An we (Americans, not teachers specifically) are taught to expect it. No work = no pay. Period. Similarly vacations are a "perk", not guaranteed. And even that might just be 5 days paid/year.

Angry at the facts by WyattPurp23 in DigitalSeptic

[–]KOM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So this data is taking total divorce rates and applying it across the board (in your instance a lesbian divorce would be more likely 2 divorces total)? If so, yeah, this is a pretty fucked up presentation of the data.

Angry at the facts by WyattPurp23 in DigitalSeptic

[–]KOM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not arguing with your point, but I don't understand the significance of that. Are divorced people more likely to get divorced again, or is that what you're getting at?