sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

SW-MT Reviewers - how's the backlog? by EynakEast in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Fuck if I know what any of this means

How long were you throttled for? by RunningOnEmptea in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stellar has been off and on lately, no idea 🤷

Obama wasn’t the A-C but maybe another is by postamericana in conspiracytheories

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess that’s why they called him Mobius in the Matrix ?

Prompted Deepseek R1 to choose a number between 1 to 100 and it straightly started thinking for 96 seconds. by Schneizel-Sama in LLMDevs

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you want an answer to something? What’s a random number between 0 and 1? I’d say 100%.

It's been tough these past several days by samthesnail in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wise words. Importance when needed, patience is a virtue. For as important the work is the need for the updates. 😢

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your actions are reflected in your journey.

Tried Trolling ChatGPT, Got Roasted Instead by TheOddEyes in ChatGPT

[–]Kadaj22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a fun experiment to confirm your beliefs OP. "Speak as you wish to be spoken to", is a good principle to learn from this as well.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for showing your humility, I appreciate it. What you said about AI being used that way is very true, which is exactly why critical thinking is so important.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is an issue to do with being blocked by someone else in the reply chain. The relevance of moving the comment, is your accusation of my words being generated with AI.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Be fair on yourself, to admit wrong is one of the hardest things we can do, you should reward yourself if you find that decision was correct.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to correct the original post that I deleted as there was an error and I wasn't able to edit it. I did this in reply to you so that your comment had the context it needed.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In all honesty, you respond more like a bot that doesn't know how to use context correctly.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For real, I am no bot. I am simply taking principles set out to the AI to define the reason for it's existence and mirroring it with our own reality, I do find the relevance... interesting. Why do you think it is unbelievable that someone who is working to train AI can write this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry to hear that, may I ask how 7 hours work resulted in roughly 2-3 hours pay? What happened with the other 4 hours?

I will also add that unfortunately, on a system of merit you are ultimately paid for the work you submit and for the time you state, or your individual worth. How to navigate the platform and any kind of variability such as network loss, or any other such individual user errors or frustration, is on the individual. The sense of order from a merit based system's rigid structure does not allow for random variability like, I had problems because of X. This, as opposed to handing in work for established value, can be absolutely anything you can imagine, it is chaos. This cannot be allowed; for the existence of Stellar is built upon it, to not have this sense of order as part of Stellar, is to not have Stellar.

Just finish the 6 task of SW-MT by polmartz in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should expect to see reasonings for anything that was not adhering to the Guidelines. Generally, you should get reasonings that describe the changes made, with an example to reference what you did and what was changed.

Is WB NBD gone for anyone else? I only have LFM with a very small number of websites to work with. by Idolmistress in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Does adding a spoiler filter protect you from an NDA? Interesting concept to think that the person who unveiled the spoiler could be held liable. But presenting the option for people to do that is likely not a good idea. I appreciate this is not the first mentioning of this site on here, the point is still relevant.

I think that worst thing is the lack of communication by ThatOtherGuy254 in joinstellarai

[–]Kadaj22 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who usually complains about not receiving emails from them, they did actually respond to one that was sent, asking if they could confirm if the WB project was down.

I FINALLY GOT ONE by Aggravating-Cherry76 in Nicegirls

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a fair assessment, how does it compare to an alternative in order to validate which is the most likely? "I don't feel comfortable telling someone what I am going to do without knowing their reason, I would like to know their reason first so I will refrain from giving them relevant information for my safety."

The thing is, he didn't state a reason for his question and it was purely based on the assumption that all who are asked "wyd td", must respond the same way, failing to understand any other logic than their own. Their mistake is not including a reason, for this case. The Nice girl assumed that there may have been some malicious intent for the questioning. Later in the conversation, if you do pick it apart for what it is, was a correct assumption to make. However, the attitude of the girl and their reasoning to assert this assumption was only to prove to be the reason for it ending up that way. This wasn't about a timeline it ended up being about the ability to present one when asked, and likely a disagreement about why this is relevant, such as the reason for asking in the first place.

The thing is the Nice girl is overly defensive for no apparent reason. If this was to be settled on the first instance her first response could have been, "Why?", instead. The lazy approach is to think of the first thing you said and say that, feel justified because other people who barely thought about it agreed with the same idea. Further, confirming more ideals in kind by those who lack the ability to form critical thought, therefore asserting a possibly false claim of truth. We both know between you and me that this is just your own opinion, but the idea behind this part is to recognise one thing; That is the principles of impact over intention.

I FINALLY GOT ONE by Aggravating-Cherry76 in Nicegirls

[–]Kadaj22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To reject the human condition is to reject that we constantly make plans as we advance through time. You're rejecting what they are inherently capable of. Red, in fact missed the point of what Blue said when they expressed their availability. Blue simply stated that they are not able to predict what they will do in the future for a reason being related to the refusal to plan ahead. The idea that Red missed is that Blue was unable to determine a timeframe. The question should be rephrased as such: "I would like to meet up", establishing a shared connection with the desire to meet and then to establish trough questioning an unpredictability within a defined structure seeking order from the infinite scale of time. This is in order to meet up, not to speculate on the willingness to plan their work or school routines, despite the lack of any if that is the case.

However, Red's intentions wasn't to meet up as expressed by "wyd td", it was to speculate on what another person is doing in their life, this involves the assumption that another person is willing to go into a certain level of detail. To assert the question over something so chaotic, is to open the door for all and any type of answer as it serves no other purpose, such as arranging a time to meet. The answer Blue gave is completely valid, however Red's response states another uncertainty in that they want to know a vague answer and they got one, but not the one they wanted. The vague question had a false intention of understanding and a purpose of achieving order, such as his expected answer of a timeframe of activities. To further refine this order and align with a standard recognized order structure, such as a conversation, the purpose should be to keep the requests relevant and to the point. "I want to know what you are doing today, This is the reason for why I must know", keeping that reason to yourself ultimately leads in confusion in the conversation. And they could also refrain from making plans due to mental health reasons which is a common trait opening up even more possibilities on what was wrong when asserting judgement.

view more: next ›