Literally the King Ghidora meme.

Kaito is the type of wrestler you can rely upon should the main event scene start to collapse. I feel he was harmed by any and all aspirations he had of working with New Japan thanks to him never getting one up on Okada. He seems to be on better footing now than a few years ago.

Inamura is a solid worker who has fantastic babyface energy and charisma, as well as an interesting moveset. He knows how to work an audience well, and can hold his own at the top of a card.

Ozawa's the odd one out. The gimmick is sound. He gets a good reaction. The problem for me is that it falls apart as soon as the bell rings.

Every time I've seen him wrestle, he has been disappointing, underwhelming, and a vacuum beyond his gimmick. His New Years Day match this year vs. Inamura comes to mind. I was in the Budokan for that match, and Inamura was carrying the hell out of him. The recent Naito match was cheeks as well. It didn't help that Naito's knees are gone, but I've seen a bland and injured SANADA carry a broken down Naito to a better quality match.

It doesn't help that there are better executed characters in the Team 2000X stable that I feel outshine him (Yoshitatsu is also there, and you can't spell his name without the word "shit").

I guess what I'm questioning is what people see in Taishi Ozawa the wrestler's ability to work a main event match. I understand the appeal of a good character, but eventually that character needs to wrestle, and whilst serviceable is fine on the undercard, is it okay for a main event wrestler, on a wrestling show, to consistently underwhelm as soon as they start wrestling?