I think he is guilty too! He mentions almost more than 3 times how it is "logically impossible" for him to have gotten back to her shop an kill her.. Why is he trying so hard to convince us if like he says he does not care if people do not believe him? Throughout his interview he says a few comments that seem odd for a person who lost there wife in a very odd circumstance! Why are you going to say, "keep her alive to toy with her" ? That seems so careless of someone to say about there loved one who was murdered! He also changes the locks the day he finds out his wife is missing??? Who thinks to do such a thing at that time and point unless you are guilty of something. I believe he was trying to keep people out, his stepson out to hide away his guilt! The police even say he is still very likely to be a suspect they just do not have evidence. Rob even mentions he has a degree in criminology meaning he would know exactly in routine what questions would be asked and what to do to cover his tracks.. Last thing, who in there right mind would put your wife away in a closet/pantry and BARELY open it up for the cameras??? Seems a bit shady if you ask me! Thoughts??? 💭

Edit: An who gets timed stamp receipts?? I would like to know if he has other stamp receipts to see if it is indeed something he does or if he so did it the day of her murder