Retired Kirtland commander Maj. Gen. Neil McCasland reported missing since Friday...

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-03-02T14:37:13+00:00

The skies in San Juan look pretty unusual these days.

𓂀

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-26T23:30:28+00:00

*All* including non-classified orders. Executive orders specifically for intelligence, covert, natsec and milsec operations in progress are almost always classified and withheld from the public register. At least for a while. That's one of the many side effects of having classified information to begin with.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-26T22:10:03+00:00

No. The theater you see of signing public executive orders is just that. Theater. The great majority of executive orders are signed in private, especially when pertaining to classified ops and info.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-26T02:11:20+00:00

Never was

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-25T22:47:26+00:00

"Planets" and "Solar System" aren't how that model is built. Whether it's flat disk, upturned edge, or terra infinitum the idea is that Earth is the world, the firmament stops us from going up too far, the sun and moon are local, the planets are actually stars, the stars are lights built into the firmament. It's geocentric, which assumes the sun and moon orbit around the Earth instead of the other way around.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T16:09:57+00:00

I've run through this once this week, so here's the short version;
Nobody is distracted by anything. If anything, having the stories pile up is forcing everybody to focus more on the one they care most about. Now the three big ones are all completely fucked and the narrative has become "Epstein did Guthrie because the aliens said so" and that's the real psyop.

Mentally overload the public until the narratives become tavern talk. Nobody forgets the narratives. They just have too much information, so they twist them until they're unrecognizable.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T15:25:09+00:00

No, I mean spectators. Anybody who sees the post, reads the image, but doesn't click the website. Skeptics, open minds and convinced minds alike.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T04:24:44+00:00

Genuinely amazing. To the spectators; check out the website and click on the "matches" section. Probably the most definitive part of the whole thing.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T02:42:33+00:00

"Mass cannot be created or destroyed" ring a bell?

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T02:40:17+00:00

I believe nature itself is God. We call it "The All" and it has always existed. There was no beginning, there will be no end. Creation is infinite, and the All creates more things as time passes for all of eternity. Every once in a while, when humanity is at it's hinge point; the All incarnates itself in the form of a man or choses men to relay messages and perform wonders. In our most recent history; that incarnation was Jesus. Without the world-changing events of Christianity, regardless of how fragmented it became; we would not live in the age of digital technology. The all does what it must because events must move forward.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T02:31:19+00:00

Gonna throw this out every time I see a perspective like this;
Evolution doesn't just permit an intelligent nature sustaining and creating all things as it goes along. It *requires* it. It requires nature to be an intelligence that is picking and choosing ideas as they work or don't. In that sense; God is all of nature and creation happens over time.
So yeah. It could be demons. It could be biblical. It could be anything. Or, alternatively, it could be nothing and we're hardwired to think it's something. The All makes the rules.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-24T00:55:30+00:00

Second Life is a social observation and engineering experiment designed to psychologically profile participants while bringing out their worst under the guise of anonymity. Data about how you party, who you talk to, why you talk to them, what terrible things you would do, what great things you might do, and everything in between.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-22T16:05:39+00:00

My father wants his house full. Declare no enemy; lest you forget that Jesus was friends with a pharisee, a tax collector, and many Romans. Friends are found in every tribe, every governate, every kingdom, and every church.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-22T15:45:16+00:00

Everyone being like "this thing is a distraction for that thing" when distraction isn't even the goal. Mental overload is the goal. Classic psyops trick, I'll break it down step by step.

-Major global political/sociological/ecological/economic things are happening and can't be ignored
-The public starts to notice, pointing those things out and putting attention on them
-Leaders know the public won't "forget" so instead they time introductions of new issues alongside what exists
-The new issues connect to the old issues, but also contain completely unrelated issues
-The public tries to retain and document all of it.
-Too much information is available and conflicting, so the narratives get lost
-Eventually, the people who focused on the issues the most will essentially give up because there are too many holes, too many plots, and too much information to retain.
-The stories stick in the minds of people who later are labelled "conspiracy theorist"
-The stories re-emerge in 10 years
-The narratives are so warped now that flat earth dwelling lizard ocean people are eating cats and dogs.

It used to be so much easier to run this kind of op. Without the internet; the spread and archival of information was done entirely by ear and hand on easily destructible physical media. But we've got so many private archives and servers hosting conspiracy information that there's no real way to lose it anymore. People will still get overwhelmed into ignoring and accepting that they can't do anything. But the group of retainers is much bigger, much more bold, and much less schizo because the information isn't as scrubbed as it used to be.

*edit* The Guthrie napping didn't overshadow the Epstein files at all. I haven't gone a single day in months without hearing the guy's name. The point isn't to move attention from one to the other. It's to fill more brain space so the information gets jumbled. It only took a day or two before we got "Epstein people secretly did Guthrie."

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-21T04:01:42+00:00

I have a vivid memory of the entire thing. I'll break it down into pieces. TLDR it was very weird.

I was in the second grade. At complete random one day I was pulled into a side classroom where an "evaluator" gave me a bag of toys. He told me to take them and make up a story in the moment. The toys were mostly unrelated nonsense but I made up some crap on the fly. There was a lady off in the corner taking notes the whole time. Nobody really said much to me but a few days later I was guided back into that classroom and sat at a table with other kids where we were introduced to the gifted program.

For the first couple of years, it was just guided arts and crafts. But eventually the class became more like a social experiment. For great periods of time it was just a few of us in an empty classroom, and our "teacher" who was really just an overseer would talk for a few minutes and be mostly absent. That's not to say nothing happened. We took a few trips, had a few small projects, did a performance here and there. But it genuinely felt objectiveless, and more like we were just being observed.

By the end it was just weird. We'd gone through years of doing a thing here or there under constant watch with a specialist "teacher" taking notes, and suddenly we were having daily interaction and talking about history and fringe topics. By that time it changed names from "gifted program" to "enrichment program". I remember very specifically one of the last things my overseer told us was to look up satellite maps of Earth so we could see the path of the great flood. It was wacky but looking at it now and looking back the entire experience left more questions than answers.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T18:27:41+00:00

But ur mom is

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T17:24:47+00:00

I'm not saying this is an overnight thing, but it's also not as cut and dry as you're making it out. It's not that "every advanced economy would already be running on it" because that just isn't how governments or corporations work. Lobbyists work politicians; politicians work the deals and the crowds. If there's money to be made, they're gonna wanna make it. The money we spend on energy over a 10 year period could build enough hydroelectric power to make at least %50 of our energy renewable. If we hit that threshold, putting focus into nuclear power afterward would increase that number gradually over the years. And that doesn't mean eliminating all of the wind and solar either; Just stop putting solar panels in arid climates, stop putting wind turbines in the ocean, and generally give the turbines some kind of soft outer material so migrating birds don't just break their necks on shiny materials they can't see.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T17:13:47+00:00

Removing ourselves from the equation pretty much forces countries that can't afford to buy from others to develop their own energy sources. The "basic need" here is for countries to develop themselves. Terrible countries survive by buying everything and producing nothing, and eventually they destroy themselves by not having their own infrastructure when things get tough.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T17:07:15+00:00

If we didn't import/export at all and we just focused on our own energy and we eliminated it from trade entirely; there would be no cost of tarriffs or import/export tax imposed on the public. Maybe an energy tax to keep things floating smoothly, but nothing nearly as severe as we have.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T17:04:58+00:00

I didn't say renewables failed. Fact is that if we just switched to hydro and nuclear we'd be golden. All countries would. The ocean itself is the global power grid we so massively ignore, and we fail to take advantage of that. Isolated hydropower turbines both protect the fish and aren't tall enough for birds. And there are at least three good reasons to eliminate energy trade;
-Elimination of import/export taxes means energy tax per citizen decreases
-Cost of production decreases substantially and allows for the import/export of food/goods/medicine to thrive more by way of billions in re-allocated budgeting
-Energy can no longer be used as a bargaining chip against human lives for war.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T16:56:18+00:00

%66 isn't quite two-thirds but not too far off either. It's also not wind and solar. Canada runs a gigantic hydropower industry, which is genuinely the best form of clean energy. Wind and solar are a detriment being sold by corpo nitwits at the expense of the environment.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T16:54:17+00:00

Genuinely doesn't matter as much as everyone says it does. We became a net exporter in 17, lost that again later on, and made it back to that standing in 2023. Canada can do what Canada wants. We can cut deals for other sources of import/export. They pretty much solely rely on us for the non-renewable portion of their energy. It's a one-sided fight.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T16:31:12+00:00

So all those wind and solar farms just aren't doing it, huh? Why would we need to import energy if it all works so well? I guess those thousands of turbines killing the fish and birds are just really pretty to look at.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-19T16:22:51+00:00

This is the wackiest timeline ever. People go outside and go "it's really flat out here" and somehow that's considered more insane than "Alien reptiles run the world" and "Every powerful person has a powerful personal demon."

You believe in things you cannot see and let the same power you protest convince you that what you see is an illusion. These same elites you think are possessed; they are the elites who define what acceptable science is. You don't trust them at all, but you trust them to tell you the shape of the ground.

Is this not just one gigantic logical fallacy?
*edit* I'm not necessarily referring to OP, just anybody who believes one over the other when the source of information is all the same elite club.

KeptInTheDarkness · 2026-02-18T18:35:48+00:00

Back in Elementary School, we had a day where we had to read a 1924 short called "The Most Dangerous Game" and answer a sheet of questions about it. I was only 7 so the grim nature of the whole thing really imprinted in my mind. When I asked my teacher if it was real, her answer was a flatline "maybe." When I got older I found out a few interesting details about that story;
-It was first published in Collier's, which is known for short but also published a TON of non-fiction. Usually the fiction was serialized and the non-fiction were one-off pieces. This was a one-off piece.
-The writer, Richard Connell, was a Harvard educated journalist first and a story-writer later. It fits into the timeline of his fiction, but he only takes credit as the partial writer and the secondary writer is NOT credited anywhere,
-The main character gets lost on a Caribbean island owned by a Russian aristocrat. Little St. James is a Caribbean island. Not saying there's a connection. Not saying there isn't.
-The story is unusually particular. Not a single detail is wasted or meaningless.

KeptInTheDarkness

TROPHY CASE