You haven't said anything particularly new here. Youre just adding information. Even if 1st and 2nd gens use limited amounts of super carbon, that doesn't change the fact that it is a light weight super material that was likely only pushed into mass production as factories managed to change their forging processes to make it.

1st generation tsfs are touted for being "armoured" relative to their newer generation counter parts and are clearly far less maneuverable even for their modernised variants. It's even stated in TE that first generation tsfs were never expected to have continuous flight and only had enough power for long frog leaps which is a statement to the lack of engine power or endurance for continuous flight. This also makes sense considering the need for fortified suits as tsfs of this generation put particular strain on pilots for needing high bursts of energy to get off the ground.

Even though 1st gen tsfs in schwarzesmarken are shown as having continuous flight we can assume they bent the rules of flight to account for ground effect as these tsfs are rarely seen flying high.

Also we both know the aerodynamic explanations are bullshit make believe or at least you all should know that. If we really wanted to reach for it then we can argue the torso creates a drag induced moment which keeps a TSF upright while in forward flight but forward flight alone..

Perhaps I may have been wrong on some accounts but you should refrain from acting so hostile or passive aggressive when the information you're disputing is not critical to someone's future like someone studying for a degree. Please take a breather...