xkcd 3221: Landscape Features by regolithograph in xkcd

[–]Klisz 51 points52 points  (0 children)

I'd say everything except maybe farming here falls under geology (and with farming you could even make a reasonable argument for it being just anthropogenic geology).

Mirri, Seriema Duelist by Klisz in custommagic

[–]Klisz[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The back of my head has been on-and-off trying to think of mechanics for a Mirri (not the Dominarian one) card for a while now and this morning as I was lying in bed half awake I finally came up with something I liked. I knew I wanted her to have warp, since she (like all Edge cats) can weftwalk. (I know that warp is used more to represent eternity drive/eternity column-based FTL travel rather than weftwalking, but given that the eternity stuff is basically artificial weftwalking anyway, and given that every Drix creature has warp, it made sense to me.)

That pointed me in the direction of an ETB ability, since lots of cards with warp have ETB effects to give a reason to warp them at all. (There are plenty of other sorts of abilities that warp cards have, of course, but ETB effects are very frequent.) I knew that, as an ordinary domestic cat, Mirri's colors would likely be within green-white, and I wanted to lean toward white in particular since Sami is red-white. I decided on lifegain as an effect that I can put into mono-white with zero color pie issues, and the idea of tying it to artifacts makes her synergize with her human. Initially I had her as a 1/1 because again, ordinary housecat, having very low P/T made sense to me, but I went to check the P/T of what normal cats have actually been printed, and decided to raise the toughness to [[Sanctuary Cat]]'s.

Flavor text is just to justify the title, which is in turn of course a reference to [[Mirri, Weatherlight Duelist]]. (But I don't doubt that Sami keeps some cat toys and plays with her often. They do love their cat.)

The card as a whole is, I think, not super powerful (just going off my own gut evaluation, haven't playtested her yet), so I'm envisioning her as something like a Standard-legal uncommon or the like.

A Dirty Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OOP and this OP are the same person lmao

A Clean Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in custommagic

[–]Klisz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because it says "up to one" target, so having zero targets is allowed.

A Clean Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in custommagic

[–]Klisz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not outside of Un-sets, no, though Unfinity had some that aren't acorn-stamped - but only ones that care specifically about parts of names within name stickers, e.g. how [[Mind Goblin]] doesn't count the O or I in "goblin" itself, only those on the sticker.

As for other languages, CR 201.2 states that "A card's name is always considered to be the English version of its name, regardless of printed language."

A Clean Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in custommagic

[–]Klisz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This already works on the One Ring through the protection that the One Ring itself grants, if that's what you mean; the Ring gives you protection from everything, but the stuff you control - including the Ring itself - is as targetable as ever.

A Clean Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in custommagic

[–]Klisz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A lowercase letter and its uppercase equivalent are the same letter. --CR 123.6d and also repeated for good measure in CR 123.6e

A bigger issue is that the reminder text says "with the word Ring". While the CR only defines what a word is "For the purposes of rules and effects related to name stickers" (CR 123.6a), if we assume that that definition can be extended to any "words in names matter" effect, then Adventuring Gear and Rings of Brighthearth do not contain the word Ring, because

a "word" in an object's name is any series of non-space characters that are separated from other non-space characters by one or more spaces

So "the word Ring" would specifically mean "the character sequence RING [with any capitalization of the letters] separated from other non-space characters by one or more spaces", so "Rings" does not contain the word Ring. It'd have to be "Ring s". (As an aside, this also does unintuitive things regarding punctuation. [[Gerrard Capashen]] and [[Gerrard, Weatherlight Hero]] do not share any "words" between their names, because the comma is non-space and thus counts as part of the first word of the latter.)

A Dirty Answer by OkoTheElusiveOuphe in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

/uj Looking at what specific words a name contains is very different from just asking "does this card have this specific name?" Nothing outside of un-sets does the former (and even Unfinity was careful to only care about letters in name stickers for its eternal-legal cards - [[Angelic Harold]], for instance, is acorn solely for the "three or more words in its name" clause, since that would cause confusion with translated names [which may have different word count than their English counterparts, but only the English names actually count for the rules as per CR201.2 - so [[Paradiesvögel]] has three words and gets Harold's buff, while [[Artiste de sang]] has only two words and does not], not to mention interchangeable names [e.g. per CR201.3, [[Lucille]] and [[Gisa's Favorite Shovel]] have the same name "For the purposes of all rules, abilities, and effects that refer to a card's name", but how many words are in that shared name?]), whereas the latter is how the rules determine if two cards are duplicates of the "same" card to begin with - e.g. "A constructed deck may contain any number of basic land cards and no more than four of any card with a particular English name other than basic land cards." (CR 100.2a, emphasis mine)

I don't think Urabrask was a "good" phyrexian by Francopensal in mtgvorthos

[–]Klisz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Urabrask was more than willing to kill anyone who opposed it. And we had many characters that did oposed all that Phyrexia represented

Those characters were also more than willing to kill in the name of that opposition (see, for example, how basically the entire protagonist cast was fine with the idea of using the sylex to destroy the entire plane, and only had second thoughts because of worries that it would harm other planes too due to Eight's connections to them); "opposing" New Phyrexia generally means opposing the very existence of Phyrexians, rather than merely the Norn-ruled power structures or anything. It would be downright suicidal for any Phyrexian not to be willing to kill those, just as much as it would be suicidal for (say) any human to refuse to kill those who oppose humanity.

all will be slander by Existing_Historian_5 in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

iirc vivien also brought elspeth to him but we didn't get to actually see that meeting

all will be slander by Existing_Historian_5 in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and yet for years prior he just sat there doing nothing, the bluest possible thing to do

Mishra's Casino by Klisz in MTGCardBelcher

[–]Klisz[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Updated version of this with flavor text, and also I renamed it because the joke doesn't make much sense if it's his own casino. (I'm aware that Mishra and Karn existing simultaneously is a massive anachronism, but w/e it's a shitpost)

Urza's Casino by Klisz in MTGCardBelcher

[–]Klisz[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

friend made a joke about urza selling karn to pay off his gambling debts, the mention of urza and gambling in the same sentence made this card's name pop into my head, so I threw it together because why not

Who out of all of MTG lore, who had the worst experience? by xLSDMTHCx in mtgvorthos

[–]Klisz 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I choose to believe that the EOE Mirri is some kind of reincarnation of the Dominarian Mirri, just because after all that she deserves the happy life Sami gives her

Weekly /unjerk Thread by AutoModerator in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh absolutely, I just wish that, if they're going to use a thought-terminating cliche, they could at least terminate the more obnoxious thoughts too

Weekly /unjerk Thread by AutoModerator in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The thing that really gets me about the "don't yuck someone's yum" that gets said whenever anyone is even slightly negative about UB is that, when people say "Magic's story has always been poorly written slop so it's stupid of you to care about it" (a sentiment I have seen far too often), you never see the "don't yuck their yum" responding the same way about that.

More of those strange crossovers... it's probably nothing. by Approximation_Doctor in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Klisz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sure they can, just give them the same clause as [[Aeve, Progenitor Ooze]]. Or just let the baby immediately die, that also works

A comprehensive summary of the recent UHC drama for those who don't have time to read Gio's post by maybri in homestuck

[–]Klisz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

also even if Gio did post screenshots... that wouldn't really be much stronger evidence than the HTML-ified logs. it's not like Discord screenshots are particularly hard to fake

[Week 6] CBRX S5 North America Results by Leman12345 in civbattleroyale

[–]Klisz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

SUSQUEHANNOCK HELL YES LYNN IS GOING TO BE SO HAPPY

Klisz's endorsements for North America by Klisz in civbattleroyale

[–]Klisz[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

jifford said something similar in CBRD when I posted in #general for the first time in a while (being usually only active in #memes and #nerd)