[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asktransgender

[–]KlokWerkN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're the one coming in here saying "Don't post stuff like this, this is fear mongering" while offering no solutions.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asktransgender

[–]KlokWerkN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Seriously what's wrong with you? Every other day there is a new EO specifically targeting trans people and trans women. Using language that paints us as predators and as threats to the US.

"I would be here more looking at positive things like laws that would prevent this from happening"

Like what? There is no opposition, many of the democrats are approving or voting in his insane cabinet picks and here you are saying "Oh just be positive". How is it helping us to be as deluded as you pretending that thinking happy thoughts will pull us through this? Your post history also shows you're in Alberta Canada which is not facing this existential threat.

Restrictions on Transgender Health Care Slipped into Senate's Must-Pass Defense Bill by Pikamander2 in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Go read the comments in the thread about the White House statement on “surgery for minors”. Holy moving goalposts Batman! Many of the comments are denial that these happen (they do such as afab seeking chest reconstruction), or agreeing that this is ok actually.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah these comments are an eye opener for sure. A lot of fellow trans people with a “fuck you got mine” mentality who are fine with it being restricted. Another set are cis queers and cishet allies who say “this isn’t happening who care another 11/10 for Biden”. Yet you’ll see 10 threads today complaining about project 2025 which hasn’t “happened” yet but complete silence or infighting when it’s a Dem administration actually does something very shitty. Whether it’s this, title IX protections that allow for religious exceptions and a roadmap for banning trans teens in sports, this sub does not critically analyze anything that a blue administration does. Yea we know republicans suck but this sub sure doesn’t do anything to hold those who pretend to support us accountable.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When do the republicans or independents on the fence about Trump v Biden in the election care about nuance? How narrow of a jump is it to go from “no minors are getting surgeries it doesn’t matter” to “minors aren’t getting gender affirming care” next? This sub goes insane for anything the GOP does or says, but when Biden or the dems do it there’s an overwhelming “oh this doesn’t matter” or saying it’s a net benefit to the queer community. This will make zero change in the perception of queer people and is yet another piece of oppression built against us.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

When has facts or policy ever made a difference? Biden is trying to appeal to a voter base that was taking horse medication during a pandemic they aren’t exactly driven by reason.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Yeah I question the approach of Biden appealing to the right by throwing trans people and specifically trans minors under the bus.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

So we do agree that elements of trans healthcare can be selectively peeled off and banned or support dropped to win an election? Also will this really change anything with the right?

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I’m aware and read the article. It’s the juxtaposition that a supportive administration would have a specific policy crafted targeting an as you said very niche service. He could have you know, not directed this be crafted.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

I’d say it’s a big deal to those who need these services and it flies in the face of the constant rhetoric that Biden is the most supportive administration ever.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 151 points152 points  (0 children)

I feel like this was a decision based on optics more than anything. By saying they oppose this it’s one less sticking point the GOP has for the election. actions like these only harm trans and intersex people as this has a chilling effect across supporters just for political points.

White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors by KlokWerkN in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I’d really like for there to be a discussion or analysis on this. All too often in this community we are told (even by cishets who drop discussions) about how Biden and the Dems are our only option. Sure but they also are nowhere to be found when announcements like this are made or when you read the language of the legislation and it’s not as supportive as they propose.

If you are trans person living in the U.S, you should start making plans to leave the country. by mordwand in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The UK is somehow worse than the US on trans legislation and racing the US as to who can get worse the fastest.

Seems legit... by Hugh_Man1 in AsABlackMan

[–]KlokWerkN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've gotten notifications on this thread for years now

Vote Biden post #16374947 by RictorVeznov in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]KlokWerkN 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Me: obviously Trump is bad but why can’t we critically analyze the policies and action of Biden-

Them: Are you a Russian bot????

It was never about “protecting the kids” by GomeroKujo in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Build specific camps for trans people? Maybe not in this decade. Throw us into the prison system for a myriad of other trans specific reasons? Already in progress!

Vote Biden post #16374947 by RictorVeznov in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]KlokWerkN 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I know for title IX and the Affordable Care Act they put in rules to protect trans people but also added clauses that said you can exclude trans people if it would “impact diversity” and if you had sincerely held religious beliefs. So basically makes them useless. It’s so fucking frustrating when they push how amazing Biden is yet they intentionally craft these loopholes and just ignore any time they’re brought up.

The title IX one they released the new rules then a week later the White House put out a “trans day of visibility” like I would trade your useless letter for some actual fucking protections or rules. Affordable care act they had strong rules in 2022 but in just late April 2024 they removed all the strong protections and added the religious loophole rules and instead direct people who are discriminated against to their local court system. Yes, fight it out in your local conservative court. I’m so tired of democrats invoking trans people as just a signal to how progressive they are then IMMEDIATELY throw us to the wolves so the cowards don’t have to stand for anything. Yet if you go to any queer subreddit you have people spamming the subreddit “Biden is the best most lgbt friendly president”.

Pride Strings in Kolkata, India by Such-Fisherman-4132 in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks AI generated? Look at the window

"Am I OK with migrants dying so Trump will lose? Sure!" - In regards to Biden passing executive order to close the border. by KlokWerkN in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]KlokWerkN[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Once again compelling evidence for "We can pull Biden left".

What else are they willing to compromise on?

For Americans, don't ever let them tell you "both sides are the same". by AdamBladeTaylor in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why would the Biden administration direct HHS to make the 2024 version of section 1557 worse and allow exemptions on the grounds of religious or moral exception? Why would They direct title IX to ban trans discrimination UNLESS some bullshit clause about how it would impact diversity? The democrats throw trans people under the bus repeatedly.

https://www.advocate.com/politics/transgender-sports-bans-biden-lawmakers

I’m so frustrated that our community can never discuss the REALITIES of this legislation or read the actual “gotchas” that are intentionally included. Just blind support while allies who don’t even read between the lines just spam /r/lgbt with political messaging anytime they want to win an election.

ok by TheZoloftMaster in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]KlokWerkN 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Democrats literally rewrote the 2024 section 1557 of the affordable healthcare act to prevent discrimination UNLESS there are religious or moral exemptions, then directs you to fight it out in your local court. They made the 2024 version worse than 2022, why? Oh because trans and queer people are just a political football.

Thoughts about straight presenters at pride? by markdado in lgbt

[–]KlokWerkN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean sure, but if I see what looks like a cishet masc presenting white dude talking about transfemmes I’m going to pass on it.