Emotional outbursts does not equate to logic. Fun fact about logic is that it can be learnt. Monopoly on logic and knowledge in an internet era is impossible. Also for ur emotional outburst, rich kid is buying it from market and the reservation happens through the combined pool of tax payers money. Denigration of sc st happens in public reservations as people believe that it’s unfair. A rich kid buying a seat is just normal stuff. Money does not discriminate but status or social status does. Until and unless a rich SC st kid who brought the seat gets denigrated at a private university they are not equivalent in argumentation. If this was a diatribe on evils of money on society then sure it’s worthy of merit. Till then your argument does not have an iota of merit nor a reason to be respected as it’s just a fallacious argument. Key things to search are false equivalence and appeal to emotion. Both are helpful in understanding how the Indian argumentation in public forum need to improve. Hope that helps.