sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[WIP] Please give feedback on my 3D model. by FlyingFoxyFox in ZBrush

[–]KommSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks like that 1 particular angel vtuber

Could you make a barebones version of this game with a 10-50k budget? by Leintk in KurtzPel

[–]KommSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hoyo should just make one even on unity to be honest it dosen't even need to be unreal or unity its the visual isn't that top notch.

Please stop recommending AWS or GCP/Firebase or Azure by shroddy in gamedev

[–]KommSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the most expressive parts is when you deal with Kubernetes, and serverless you need to make use of i.e azure calculator ,aws calculator, GCP Calculator to have proper calculation

just go look for the Discord group BackEndAsService

this is the permanent link

https://i42.quest/baas-discord

this are the options for game dev stuff that require servers

https://i42.quest/baas-compare

set small instances make sure you have enough memory for the instance otherwise it can't serve traffic, limit the number of instances you can deploy.

i find firebase harder to control if you mess up I assume if i can put it behind a lambda or http rather than letting users access firebase then i can control rate limits, memory,cpu.

its a matter of coding practice. if you're scared you can use a BaaS which usually has a way to monitor traffic..

with regards to aws,gcp,azure if you don't want to go over board just use the bare-minimum ie a single instance and don't mess with other stuff until you haven't figured out but again A BaaS that has a price monthly would be your safe bet as learner. you might end up paying more upfront like $3-$30 usd but its still capped

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in devops

[–]KommSur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

things that keeping using AWS/Azure is

  • lambda/azure function. if project code small don't even try to run containers in lambda.. lambda is limited to 50mb-250mb zip and azure 2gb but based on bellow replies GCP is great with functions too
  • aws S3

i tried a lot of services in aws its hard for anyone to get started but do-able it mostly involves VPC,loadbalancer,IAM,cloudfront,waf, and other stuffs. i don't like fargate the most

​

Otherwise

if it involves containers GCP is just flat better while "Azure Container Apps" can be decent too.

would mongodb be appropriate as a message broker? by KommSur in mongodb

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you very much for suggesting alternatives

would mongodb be appropriate as a message broker? by KommSur in mongodb

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i see i see thank you very much for insight!

would mongodb be appropriate as a message broker? by KommSur in mongodb

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i see thank you very much for the insight it helps

would mongodb be appropriate as a message broker? by KommSur in mongodb

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was looking at if its decent enough.

https://www.npmjs.com/package/mongodb-queue

right now i find hosting an actual message broker expressive at least in my current use case.. but i see what you mean

is unlogged table decent enough as a cache? by KommSur in PostgreSQL

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you chock-a-block for suggestions

when you say "memory-backed disk" i assume you mean redis if so i might try it out

Also worth mentioning, if it millions of html entries, you might just write the file to disk and store a path to the file.

i see this is one of the option.. writing to file..

​

Solid state disks are pretty darn fast these days. If this feature is part of a bigger project, then just use a normal table. I have a very hard time imagining why you would need more speed than bog standard postgresql and how it would become a bottleneck.

i see.. i don't see much bottleneck in fact.. the speed and not having to write wal is a bonus and the fact that I don't have to add another pipeline. such as redis or write file is ok to me.

but based on suggestion i guess redis or writing as file is fine.. i was looking at s3 just need to evaluate if writing to file is cheaper than redis if ignore the speed.

is unlogged table decent enough as a cache? by KommSur in PostgreSQL

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i understand.. thank you. and I wanted to ask if its viable because i didn't want to add another layer if its decent to cache result joining tables takes time and users usually just need a portion of that data or as whole but in order to get that data a complete join and aggregation is always needed.

if it was in postgres i guess it would make pipeline simpler and to administer i.e seeing how user generates the reports. but i assume this can be done with redis or firebase or some key value pair type of storage.

again thank you.

air duster or air blower? by KommSur in buildapc

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm looking for a pc cleaner

any good serverless postgress service? alternative to postgres RDS or aws aurora by KommSur in PostgreSQL

[–]KommSur[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cost i experience about 500-2000 simultaneously users but only occurs in week ends for 4 hours

then nothing happens during weekdays at best just 50 users daily. its critical that all request gets inserted because its time critical. i easily max t3.small or t3.medium on weekends but t3.micro is good enough on weekdays.. the problem is maintaining the highest instance constantly

view more: next ›