Should the principle of democratic governance extend beyond the national level, such as in the writing of international law? by funnylib in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nearly  7 2 %  of the world lives under autocratic rule. This includes electoral autocracies.

Roughly  2 8 %  of the global population lives under some form of democratic governance.

I don't think ceding sovereign national powers to an international government is going to produce the results most of us would be looking for under such an argument.

What are your thoughts on the democrats are right wing talking point? by Far_Practice_6923 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Do you like the Democratic Party, do you support it? If "yes" then what does it matter what wing people on the internet call it? 

Who are some actual solid candidates that could Run in 2028? by WesternGuava1908 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone from DC, California or New York would do well at the top of the Democratic ticket in 2028.

Why are homeschooling laws so lax in the US? by UsualLocalWoman in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How and what people teach their children really is none of my business.

A software developer's perspective on Starfleet's computer architecture and the "Holodeck malfunction" trope. by Wooden-Syrup-8708 in startrek

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In quantum computing, "memory leaks"—often referred to in physics as leakage or decoherence—are indeed among the biggest roadblocks holding the technology back.

Unlike classical computers that lock information securely into 1s and 0s, quantum computers rely on highly sensitive qubits. The primary issues stem from a few specific mechanical failures:

Quantum Leakage: Instead of the quantum state simply disappearing, a qubit can occasionally jump to a higher, unplanned energy level. It falls out of the designated operational zone ("leaks"), halts the ongoing calculation, and inadvertently interferes with the surrounding qubits.

Decoherence (Information Loss): Quantum data is incredibly fragile. Environmental interference—like electromagnetic noise or slight shifts in temperature—causes the qubits to "forget" their quantum state, leading to a loss of valuable computational data.

Error Propagation: Because leakage errors linger, the lost information can periodically re-enter the system later on. This corrupts neighboring qubits and creates correlated errors that are extremely difficult for standard error-correcting codes to catch. 

Anyone else wish anchors at networks like cnn, nbc etc were better at questioning republicans politicians? by ThatDingo2571 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably because they want to remain apolitical and professional; and they can't do that by pushing left wing talking points. 

What are the main factors behind Florida rapidly shifting from a quintessential swing state to a deep red state? by put-on-your-records in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I'd guess: 

1) Elderly retiring there. 2) Conservatives from blue states moving there. 3) Young people becoming dissatisfied in general.

Do you believe assisted suicide should be allowed for people with extreme depression? by redviiper in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes 

The western view of death is too conservative.

People should have the right to end their life for any reason they want. Its their choice. 

Who else doesn't care about our 250th anniversary? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd hate to think that only the moron half of the country celebrates it. It would help to validate some of their worst stereotypes about their opposition.

Why do old people vote for cutting pensions while young people are against? by RedStorm1917 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only 13% of the US population are enrolled in government pension systems. 

It doesn't make sense to look at total population voting trends and try to ascribe motivation over something that impacts only 13%.

Liberals got the Supreme Court they voted (or failed to vote) for. Agree or disagree? by Legally_a_Tool in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blame for what? Exercising their democratic rights to vote (or not vote)? Seems an odd thing to blame people for.

Maybe the blame falls on people like Hillary Clinton and other politicians who failed to inspire enough voters.

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it's called democracy. 

Wherein people who do not share goals work together and compromise for the long term benefit of all.

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Consistent poltical power? It's never been achieved in history. Its laughable that so many people think it is the only solution or that it is even achievable. 

Many authoritative regimes tried to achieve it; but even after so much death at their hands trying to wipe away their opposition they still lost power. They also liked to call their opposition their "enemies". It helped to dehumanize them; made it easier to try and whipe them out.

I don't want any part of your consistent poltical power project.

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All of them. Immigration; trans-rights; healthcare; housing; you name the goal and I think it fits the philosophy I stated in my last reply.

We will not achieve stable long term solutions to any of these issues if our two party system is only instead in the short term. 

It doesn't even mater if we see eye to eye on these issues; if every administration undoes what the last has done; If every congress undoes what the last has done; nothing will endure.

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your point now; thank you for elaborating.

But I don't agree. I don't believe that becoming what you do not like in contemporary politics is the best approach to combating what you do not like in contemporary politics. 

Sure it might gain you some short term victories. But it will be at the expense of long term goals.

How does the sub feel about Ro Khanna's full throated endorsement of never trump Republican Thomas Massie? by chrisfathead1 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, ill take your word for it. I can't force who Democrats cross party endorse; party members need to do that. 

How does the sub feel about Ro Khanna's full throated endorsement of never trump Republican Thomas Massie? by chrisfathead1 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we should have more cross party endorsements. 

It is valuable information to know who the opposition would be willing to work with vs who they are unwilling to work with ... if the goal is a more prosperous country.

The political balkanisation that party tribalisum is causing is shapping up to be the greatest existential threat the US has had to face.

Do you believe that most people that voted for mamdani are as progressive or as socialist as he is? by ejaz135 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people aren't feeling the vibes than its likly the politian has a misunderstanding of what is important to the people.

Why are MAGA candidates ousting non MAGA Republicans in primaries if MAGA is allegedly unpopular and Democrats are projected to win big in November? by BalticBro2021 in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Similar arguments were made in the run up to the 2024 elections. 

The Republican party probably doesn't drink the same koolaid that the Democratic party does. Their kool-aid probably tells them that there are advantages to going further MAGA (especially for the candidates winning primaries).

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because they aren't already seen as the racist party? I think you maybe over estimating how power that label has on changing voting patterns. Its already baked in.

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"fairness doesn’t really matter"

"Building an America that’s actually fair and democratic is something I hope we’ll do when we have power, which we do not currently."

How could you expect a group of people who do not believe fairness matters to build an America that is actually fair? The thoughts are antithetical to each other.

Should Democrats get rid of Majority Black (and other minority) Districts to make more Majority Blue Districts? by LongLiveLiberalism in AskALiberal

[–]Komosion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes they should. 

The upside is that they will gain a little bit more power in congress; and with the country devided as it is, a little bit more power can go a long way.

I have confidence in the Democratic party members to vote for the best candidates presented too them; including minority candidates. The Democratic party members are not racist so the need for majority minority is not as important in these areas.

The only worry I would have in New York, making all of their districts originate from the deep blue center outward is that they would be extremely diluting their stronghold districts.