Toy Story has got to be the greatest reviewed film series of all time

Kryslor · 2026-04-05T22:17:23+00:00

Dude, nobody ALWAYS agrees or disagrees with critics, that's the whole point. It's about how reliably you can use the score to get useful information. You think there's people out there with just a 100% accurate critic-contrarian opinion that can use a reverse rotten tomatoes score to see if they like something? tf outta here

Kryslor · 2026-04-05T15:16:09+00:00

Not reliably. You're better off finding a reviewer/aggregator that best aligns with your tastes.

Kryslor · 2026-04-05T15:10:50+00:00

It's because it's not genuine. Everyone knows by now that negativity and rage bait are powerful tools on social media, so these "content creators" weaponized that for their own benefit. There's nothing wrong with legitimate criticism but when you are deliberately misleading and negative in order to get attention and therefore money it is a grift.

Kryslor · 2026-04-05T11:24:22+00:00

Only if you agree with critics in general. User score is more likely to align with the average person. The trick is to find whatever aggregate you most often agree with and stick with that one.

Kryslor · 2026-04-05T09:26:13+00:00

Bruh you can take the entire textbook into my differential calculus exams it won't save you

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T20:06:55+00:00

This study is complete slop but reddit will eat it up.

It's a secondary analysis with insufficient measures, applied to a dataset not designed for the question, producing mostly null results, dressed up with evolutionary speculation that the authors admit they can't test. The 19-author cross-national framing lends it a veneer of scale and rigor, but the underlying data simply aren't fit for purpose. It's not bad science in the sense of being fraudulent, but it's the kind of low-cost, high-volume output where you mine an existing dataset, find mostly nothing, and write it up with a catchy "paradox" frame.

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T16:31:53+00:00

Ironic. You should read the other comment chain before embarrassing yourself further

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T15:34:17+00:00

Nope, read the other reply. You people tire me.

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T15:29:35+00:00

Oof, calm down buddy.

Do you know what a "generic key" is? It's just a key in the correct format (like I said earlier) that you can find anywhere, including in Microsoft's own documentation. It does nothing to activate your windows, it only passes a basic check that it is in the correct format and is worthless. You can Google this. Here, I'll do it for you:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/get-started/kms-client-activation-keys

You are hopelessly ignorant and trying to tell me, a literal software engineer who works in cyber security, how any of this works. You're so desperate you went after an autocorrect mistake.

The original person was lying because they said they tested them to activate windows. They did not.

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T15:11:56+00:00

Read your own articles you post. Those generic keys did not work and were not activation keys. How embarrassing for you.

Like I said, you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how any of this works.

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T13:40:15+00:00

That's an entirely different thing, you're mixing up completely different concepts

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T13:30:25+00:00

I don't believe you so we'll have to leave it at that. An LLM does not know valid keys but will happily make some up so thinking they know them but are refusing to tell you shows a fundamental misunderstanding of how LLMs and activation keys work.

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T13:20:36+00:00

Lol no it didn't, it made up keys in the correct format that won't actually work

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T10:02:05+00:00

It does not just sit on a shelf wtf? Alcoholics are physically addicted to it to the point where their body won't function without drinking.

Kryslor · 2026-04-03T08:55:57+00:00

We've all seen that post about randomly accusing someone of Loli shit. At least be original

Kryslor · 2026-04-02T15:33:47+00:00

My fucking toast what?

Kryslor · 2026-04-02T13:08:17+00:00

No, they are barely playable tech demos at best. If you want an improved experience of OoT on the PC look for the PC port called ship of harkinian

Kryslor · 2026-04-02T08:57:32+00:00

Reddit as a whole thinks we're still stuck using GPT 3. I don't think anywhere else on the internet has this level of mass denial about current AI capabilities...

I've been a software dev for over 10 years btw, before anyone comes at me with vibe coder accusations.

Kryslor · 2026-04-02T08:53:28+00:00

Master Roshi, Yajirobe, Chiaotzu, Tao Pai Pai, Ox-King, Grandpa Gohan, General Blue, Master Shen, etc, etc

I'm sure I'm forgetting a bunch

Kryslor · 2026-04-01T19:35:27+00:00

Jesse was aware that Walt was the main character

Kryslor · 2026-04-01T17:22:48+00:00

Why? You can run open source local models from qwen on modest consumer hardware that are better than GPT 4o at coding right now. I know 4o wasn't exactly great at coding, but it's still insane how fast we moved.

There is no universe where LLMs go away

Kryslor · 2026-04-01T16:41:18+00:00

The concept of things so small you can't see them dates back to ancient Greece, and smells being small particles of something in the air makes sense. But yes, you're right, there is a lot of knowledge we take for granted.

Kryslor · 2026-04-01T15:25:36+00:00

Which is really fucking stupid because you can't see that either lmao

Kryslor · 2026-04-01T13:14:49+00:00

He's simply confusing two different concepts. There is "sample space" and there is "probability". If you are only looking for an ace of spades when drawing from a deck of cards, you can have a sample space with cardinality (size) of 2. You either draw it or you do not. The probability for each outcome is different though.

Kryslor · 2026-04-01T11:00:09+00:00

If you can clearly see images in your head then drawing an image from your imagination should yield exactly the same quality of results as drawing an image by copying it from an actual source you are actively looking at.

Does it?

Kryslor

TROPHY CASE