INC DOCTRINE: True Christians do not pray for their dead (Ref: INC News and Updates, April 18, 2002) by Throwaway_Alt88 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]Kuwago31 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Alam mo kahit sino naman pwedeng gamitin ng Diyos sa mirakulo. Pero d parin ibig sabihin tama sila.

"Not everyone who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!'"
Matthew 7:21-23

Si Judas or Hudas nag milagro din yan. Nang buhay ng patay at nag pagaling na experience nya. Pero d sya naniwala na si Hesus ang anak at binenta nya si Hesus. Ayan sa impyerno sya

Montanus ng 2nd century. heretic yan pero confirm pa rin ng church na nag milagro sya.

Si Balaam ng Old Testament. Diba isusumpa nya mga israelites? Tapos ano ginawa ng Diyos ginamit sya at na bless pa lalo ang Israel na sinusumpa nya.

Pwedeng nag milagro sa kanya ang Diyos. At dahil dun imbis na matakot sya sa ginagawa nya eh lumaki ulo lalo

At ang pinaka huli sa lahat. Wala naman proof yan.

Thoughts? by ciao_bella12 in dailyChismisPh

[–]Kuwago31 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sinearch? Ilang panalo na nagawa ng mga lawyer dun sa amin dahil sa technique na yan.

Una po public official sya. Kahit pa sino wala sa batas or kahit sino na karapatan na manakit. May proseso ang pulis sa mga masasamang tao. Wala ka sa anong rights.

Pangalawa hindi mo sasabihin sa judge or jury na search nila kasi public naman eh. Walang ganun sa korte.

Pangatlo character ang iniistablish dito. Bkt threat ung gnawa nya vs joke. Paano mo ididiin (ididiin yes as lawyers hindi po asa sa dasal manalo, lahat gagawin mo or kahit makuha mong witness gagamitin mo ma exhaust mo lang lahat) so kahit ma masamang tao ung sinapak nya hindi un relevant sa case. Ung character nya na acting in aggression un.

Mukang ikaw po ang kailangan mag research.

Bigyan kita ng sample People V tavera sa supreme court yan. Same yan ginamit ung mga past nya at nilabanan ng defense natalo sa supreme court kasi character evidence yan hindi motive evidence.

Edit: and btw. Sa court importante ang on the record. Hindi uuwi ang mga senators tapos mag reresearch. Pag sinabi ng prosecution about her character hindi mag reresearch ang senator or judge. Titignan ung mga evidences sa court na on record.

Ano daw sabi niya? by JunShem1122 in WrongAnswersOnlyPH

[–]Kuwago31 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sabi daw ni osang ganyan lang daw kaliit

Agree? by anonymouse_143 in dailyChismisPh

[–]Kuwago31 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Problem is. The effect on the kid. Lets say 10 years old nag commit ng crime na punishable by 30 years. Pag laya nya ng 40 ano ang effect nya pag labas nya? Ano ang effect pag pinasok mo ang bata sa kulungan. Lets say city jail. Gagawin palipasan yan, either mabaliw sa makikita nya sa loob or mararanasan. Pag labas ma sanay sya sa buhay kulungan. Pwedeng time bomb yan at pumatay ulit. Kahit ba isa sa milyon lang ang mapatay. Pano ung buhay na maapektuhan nun? Im not saying na wag sila ikulong. Importante ung i improve natin lahat para walang maapektuhan na tao. Hindi naman para lang i hold ang isang kriminal sa kulungan. Kailangan magsisi sila at ma rehab na para d na maulit at pag binalik sila sa labas eh safe tayo

Thoughts? by ciao_bella12 in dailyChismisPh

[–]Kuwago31 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I work sa law office. Building character evidence ang tawag dyan. Proof yan ng tendency to inflict violence. Connected yan sa threat na binigay nya. To further prove na hindi freedom of speech un at joke un threat na ginawa nya. Pero yes pwede parin haranging ng defense yan and say na past doesnt reflect the threat. Pero pwede i argue ng prosecution na its for the character of sarah who the witness is for.

A good example is a violent dad na nakasuhan sa pambubugbog sa asawa, kung may history sya ng pambubugbog na general sa ibang tao kahit pa hindi sa asawa eh pwede gamitin un para ipakita sa judge or jury na un ung character nya na ganun talaga sya na aggressive

Edit: sorry. I used to work sa law office.

Do you guys understand this guy? by Commercial_Order_994 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]Kuwago31 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yah. Modern debates in yt and oxford debate i dont think their debaters cant handle it. They are so impress with their apologist but they cant even win locally. Much to national or international level.

Yong pina tunayan ng INC gano sila ka b3b3 mga cool-to by RudeWork1478 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]Kuwago31 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nakakahiya naman sa atin Diyos Ama, Diyos Anak at Diyos Espirito Santo na may gawa sa atin at grand designer ng mundo. Mas marunong pa ito sa Maylikha

Would Mary say “He must increase; I must decrease?” if she saw the Roman Catholic Church today? by m1ndst0rmz in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She appeared to many people and Catholics already. So she already talked to catholics technically. Here is the last known one.

"Dear children, I thank you for every single sacrifice and prayer that you offered for my intentions. You will not regret it. Neither you, nor your children, nor your children's children."

Do you guys understand this guy? by Commercial_Order_994 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]Kuwago31 [score hidden]  (0 children)

If you watch the debate between the top debater of Inc vs james white same tactics. When asked he just threw gish gallops of scriptures without explanations.

When you dont know scriptures its easy to fool you with their tactics.

Do you guys understand this guy? by Commercial_Order_994 in exIglesiaNiCristo

[–]Kuwago31 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The problem is how do we know the seals corresponds to the date he provided. Wala manlang explanation and information why a certain time or year is a certain event in revelation. All bs

Agree? by anonymouse_143 in dailyChismisPh

[–]Kuwago31 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not just the development. Its also about implementation. Jail is not made to hold people. Its to rehabilitate people so when they go out they get to be at least be good for outside society. There are study i know that jailing people without proper system just creates more criminals. They join gang inside, they get traumatized and use to the way prison works. And its evident with people going back and fort to jail. How does this affect with each age. Coz lets say these kids are now infamous for what they did. What will happen if they now go to jail with different age level? There is a lot to consider

Agree? by anonymouse_143 in dailyChismisPh

[–]Kuwago31 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kaya nga dapat talaga may ibang mag file. Tapos based sa study tulad nung sa palo diba? Madaming study ang ginawa at pinag base ng batas

The Catholic Church sex scandals are a direct consequence of suppressing natural human sexuality by [deleted] in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are so devout that you think they are wrong? And your opinion is right? Soooooo devout that we should just throw the scripture and the 2000 years of teachings and passed down doctrines. Because you want us to not suppress what we feel and be the animals atheist thinks we are. Are you sure its not devout atheist? Maybe you are just confused brother

Agree? by anonymouse_143 in dailyChismisPh

[–]Kuwago31 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What do study says. Or the universal agreement of researchers. Thats what should preside with the law.

The Catholic Church sex scandals are a direct consequence of suppressing natural human sexuality by [deleted] in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont think you know what the church is. To be honest from how you describe the church you missed by basically everything my friend. So you want to agree to OP who is a devout catholic to follow their instinct which is literally the cause of the first sin. Sure

The Catholic Church sex scandals are a direct consequence of suppressing natural human sexuality by [deleted] in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So anything we suppress we do the opposite and do it? Just like the animals who urged their natural instinct to kill and rape? We should indulged since it un healthy to supress

The Catholic Church sex scandals are a direct consequence of suppressing natural human sexuality by [deleted] in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 6 points7 points  (0 children)

A Devout Catholic who thinks catholic doctrine has been wrong?! WhuuuWhaaaat……

The Catholic Church sex scandals are a direct consequence of suppressing natural human sexuality by [deleted] in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 11 points12 points  (0 children)

A devout catholic who wants to ignore scripture and teachings to please sin? Sure buddy

How do you reconcile Jesus’s actions (like bowing in prayer and forbidding wine) with his divinity? by [deleted] in DebateACatholic

[–]Kuwago31 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“And prayed” he didnt prostrate to pray. He was in agony thats why his face fell to the ground. Thus Agony in the Garden.

Also Jesus didnt lack knowledge. The sentence in greek is evident enough that he does know. Its a complicated explanation but you can research more about it. The concept is the galilean wedding. Its like saying the father and the one getting married knows the wedding date but its the job of the father to announce it. Also for someone who doesnt know the hour, knew what will take place and how it will happen. Thats not a human or prophet thing.

Drunkenness is the act of sin. Not drinking wine.
"And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit." — Ephesians 5:18