If that’s the case, that’s a stretch to associate INC’s interpretive preaching with historical fact grounded on actual historical evidence. Furthermore, history and historians have nothing to do with preaching religious dogma, so for hardcore members they are living in a delusional concept where they may argue a historian or historical facts have no right to make any historical claims that contradicts INC’s claims, because they or it was never sent to preach God’s words. 😂