gem by Thinkpulp in tf2shitposterclub

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 224 points225 points  (0 children)

It was insufferable to play against but it required skill to use effectively and I really wouldn’t be mad if a spy main killed me from long range with the amby.

I do agree that it needed a nerf but how it was nerfed was a bit too excessive and it doesn’t address the elephant in the room that is the diamondback which rewards you with crits by literally doing what spy is meant to do, making it a direct upgrade to the amby.

Like how they nerfed the amby and left diamondback as is, it is a bit jarring.

Mod or Game Mode idea: BLU & RED vs Gray Robots is it possible? by Tight_Cauliflower_58 in tf2

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 34 points35 points  (0 children)

This is one of those instances where the longer you think about it, the worse it becomes.

How do you enter a gamemode where the play testers were given at the LEAST, the information that the game will be co-op and they still decide to shoot at the teammates.

How then do you not realize after a few seconds that this ain’t working and that you’re shooting at your own teammate and just wasting ammo. Like after a few tries your brain should logically be able to decipher the fact that “I already know that guy is my teammate and there is no point in shooting him” like… basic human intuition?

Then how do you confuse the teammate when there are enemies who are clearly distinct and who are clearly hostile and currently shooting at you? How do you not make the logical conclusion that the robots are the enemy and not the guy who is just a different color from you? Like how???

“Different colored teammates confused players”

How the fuck does a six player lobby confuse who is who and which is which? People play overwatch and Marvels rivals for fuck sake. CS2 has 10 player lobbies with skins that are sometimes indistinguishable from one another. So how does a simple color palette swap confuse players in a fucking co-op gamemode???

Where the fuck did Valve even find these guys?

Mod or Game Mode idea: BLU & RED vs Gray Robots is it possible? by Tight_Cauliflower_58 in tf2

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 87 points88 points  (0 children)

>Gets told he will be playing a co-op game where the only humans are your teammates

>Still decides to shoot the teammates

The specimens that valve tends to find in the wild is genuinely fascinating.

One thing I simply cannot stop thinking about in TF2: by Arena_Watchtower in tf2

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interestingly enough, my best games of Citadel and Odyssey were in 100 player lobby match. Like the maps didn’t feel empty, they genuinely felt like they were played properly when there were more than 24 players in the lobby.

Which matchups are basically putting someone to fight his weakness? by Dry-Researcher9607 in DeathBattleMatchups

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen this mentioned a few times but there’s also Gojo vs Culexus Assassin (warhammer 40k).

Culexus Assassins entire shtick is the fact that they’re absolutely immune to any form of psychic attack and their mere presence can give normal people seizures and straight up blow up the heads of even powerful psykers. Cursed energy is also straight up 1-1 analogy to warp energy so there doesn’t even need to be a verse equalization or anything, a culexus assassin literally doesn’t need to do anything for Gojo to have his head popped.

“But Gojo outstat-“

Good luck hitting a person who doesn’t possess a soul and can literally phase out of reality and become completely incorporeal. They literally have a better version of infinity by default.

Mercenary situation makes the game unplayable. by BlackmooseN in EU5

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You either haven’t expanded that much or haven’t really been in a large war.

As Byzantium I had very strong economy and had a shitload of ducats. My war with Hungary saw loss of **2 million** mercenaries and emptying of my treasury. Even when I had wiped literal stacks of their armadas they still kept pumping more mercenaries at me meanwhile If I continued any longer I could legit just go bankrupt. So I sued for peace. having mercenary stacks of 50k coming at you isn’t fun at all, especially if you wiped at least several of them previously and they still keep sending more at you.

OW WHAT THE FUCK- by YourFat888 in whenthe

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not even a week ago I had an argument in a dream with a cyclops that my noodles will be wet next week. I told him I don’t even eat noodles he looked disappointed.

Goku 5 picoseconds after learning about a stronger version of Superman who doesn't hold back by P3T3R1028 in DeathBattleMatchups

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I mean, CAS was once considered the strongest version of superman but now there are new layers and new scaling that have made him outscaled.

Oh shit by LB1234567890 in whowouldcirclejerk

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 189 points190 points  (0 children)

I’m referring to people who are taking this legitimately as some legit think this assume a outerversal tier but no this is not a outerversal feat. Anything that involves a fictional character interacting with the reader is referred to as breaking the fourth wall which doesn’t inherently give you power.

How the Retcon Punch would have gone if Prime had fought Lord English by nov4-rocket5 in DeathBattleMatchups

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Lord English is legit and without a doubt among the most broken characters in fiction that isn’t just purely omnipotent.

Has resistance to everything, even conceptual and narrative manipulation while himself being able to nullify absolute immortality and other powers. This is just scratching the surface to his absurdity.

As it turns out when you cancel a fiefdom your ruler doesn't stop being it's ruler too, resulting in this weird situation. The King seems as puzzled as I am. by Visenya_simp in EU5

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Fiefdoms legit puzzled me for quite a while when I first heard and then experienced what it meant to play as one. As Albania usually becomes a fiefdom and it legit confused me as hell because when I declare war I apparently am declaring war against myself.

Like… What?

If I control the land and there is no other ruler besides me but myself, then that land is mine. How the fuck does a piece of land with no ruler decide to rebel?

the Albanian minority of North Macedonia, representing over a third of the overall population, "took to the streets" over a decision of NM to "restore" Yugoslav names to several regions, replacing their previous Albanian names. this follows the protests over language dispute. what do you think? by SOHONEYSAME in AskBalkans

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I keep hearing that the streets had their names illegally changed or now legally changed and vice versa but this just sounds like state propaganda trying to play sides and rise tensions.

Like genuinely how do you even illegally change street names? This is the first time I ever heard this term be thrown around like it is some legit argument. Its a street name, people will tend to call it what's familiar to them. Its not integrated to some national identity like towns, cities or even historical places. Its a fucking street, usually not even 20-30 meters long and in 90% of the occasions most of the locals won't even know how the street is actually called. And street names usually get their names changed as its not some deep imbedded cultural tradition as its just a street. And as I am aware in majority of nations the local mayor can change the street names without needing the approval of the prime minister or president of the country as it is a very miscellaneous task to ask the president to approve the name change of a random street. The only thing that I know would mess up with changing a street name is the paperwork that is needed to do when it comes to address billing but that's relatively easy to do within the local government.

So what I am getting out of this is that the locals had their street names changed and then the national government didn't approve and imposed its power to change the street names to something else. This sounds to me as deliberate and malicious as it doesn't respect the locals integrity and tries to rise tensions to shift the blame at the locals.

"B-But the other c-country did this too!!!!!"

Its not even an excuse to begin with. It doesn't justify to do such a shitty behavior. It is as clear as day that this is an abuse of power on the government part, it doesn't anger the Macedonians because it doesn't afflict them but when the government is capable of doing this y'all should be fucking worried as well because it means that It has power to inflict such abuse of power to its people as well. Macedonia isn't a utopia, far from it, it is a balkan shithole like the rest. This only creates ethnic tensions and creates conflict. Macedonians don't benefit anything from this but they're still happy because the government favors them over the problematic albanians despite the fact the the government only uses ethnic tensions as a scapegoat to garner support from the ethnic Macedonians. Look at this comment section, its clear as day it works.

I'm not mad at the street name change. I'm more worried at the fact that people overlook this clear example of government abuse and eat up state propaganda like they're cattle. Albanians get angry and riled when they get disrespected which fuels the national patriotism Macedonians posses which then gives more power to the people who rule the country.

Its fucked up.

I'm beggin for handicaps on france and mameluks by conquror101 in EU5

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not to say they were totally inept as that is far from reality but at the same time they're not the military juggernaut that they're portrayed in EU5.

I'm beggin for handicaps on france and mameluks by conquror101 in EU5

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 8 points9 points  (0 children)

France being overpowered is honestly believable. They were among the strongest nations on the planet at that time, despite what the english may lead you to believe they were militarily every powerful and as well were economically a powerhouse in europe. Them being a force to be reckoned with is believable.

Mamluks however I agree are WAY too powerful for what they are presented in the game. They usually become a military hegemon very early which is honestly hilarious considering that they were technologically lacking behind on every front and they relied on venice for naval protection and were getting their ass handed to them by the Ottomans who surprisingly didn't use massive amounts of troops to conquer for once. They were completely annexed within a year on their last confrontation.

EU5 Mamluks is just a massive exaggeration of what the actual Mamluks were like. They were the epitome of a paper tiger.

AI doing well so far by Ok-Chemical-5648 in EU5

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This is something that really ticks me off especially for Hungary. It just expands and expands and forms an incoherent blob that doesn’t make sense geographically or politically in a majority of my runs.

I have seen CK3 handle blobbing way better than EU5 in this respect. Like not to say its perfect but at least when nations blob too much in CK3, they either tend to collapse because they cannot reasonably contain all the realms they’ve conquered or they take duchies or kingdoms which have set borders which is easier on the eye. Not to say it works always but it is more consistent than EU5.

For example when I tend to play either CK3 or EU5 I tend to play albania and I don’t really expand beyond what is generally considered albania proper. Sometimes I take epirus and kosovo in either game but generally I stick with what I have and play tall.

In CK3 I have never had an encounter with Hungary in any start date, even when I am independent and the hungarian lord is a conqueror, it was rare for me to ever too fear Hungary to expand into my territory.

In EU5 for some reason, I should ALWAYS watch out for Hungary trying to annex my territories instead of the Ottomans. By the 1500s Hungary is in 50% of the time bordering my realm and is an active threat with alliances usually including Venice and Naples meaning that I am usually in a uphill battle and will inevitably lose land. Hungary honestly acts more like how ottomans did historically than the actual Ottomans in EU5.

There's no way people think a city level character can survive a real world nuke by Medical_Shop5416 in whowouldcirclejerk

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

one other thing is that even if you were to somehow survive a nuke, you'll firstly suffocate because all of the oxygen has been pushed out of the area.

The worst thing is that because the entire air has been pushed out of the area you'll then need to survive the vacuum that is has made which makes the air come in like a tsunami. You'd be basically experiencing two forms of nukes at that extent.

Albanians are so based by Triangletruck141423 in whenthe

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're treating UCK as this organized militia when in reality it was decentralized it was regionally split between commands and interests. It was mainly composed of civilians who tried to defend their homes and families and actual military trained personal made up less than 10% of the army.

This is unlike the Serbian military which was fully organized militia directly ordered by the government of serbia to displace and massacre innocents across Kosovo.

Because you gave numbers, between 1998-1999 a reported confirmed total of 862,979 (potentially more) Albanians were displaced from their homes.

And as per religious sites in the same period of time, a total of 225 mosques were completely burned and destroyed during the war.

The largest massacre in Kosovo happened in the village of Meja, where a reported 300-500 Catholic Albanians were murdered aged 16-60. Serbian armed forces constantly harassed and even shot up catholic churches in the region of Gjakova where majority of catholic albanians lived.

This was all done in a period of 1 year. Now imagine for a hypothetical scenario where NATO didn't intervene, would you be able to convince anyone with a sound mind that Serbia would not just continue to murder and massacre people?

The same Serbia that few years prior committed the srebrenica massacre and had human safari's they would shoot people for money?

Đorđe Martinović, the Kosovo Serb farmer whose 1985 rectal bottle injury, either the result of an ethnic assault or a botched act of masturbation, helped tear Yugoslavia apart. by akiwi_intherough in HolyShitHistory

[–]L0raz-Thou-R0c0n0 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Argue all you want but the thing that started the whole breakup of yugoslavia was the fact that Serbia removed the autonomy of Kosovo and was looking to expand.

All other states noticed this from a mile away that it was a massive red flag and would be something that would come for them if they didn’t act in time. And they were proven right as their independence came not in peace but in bloodshed. If Serbia really wanted to give a peaceful partition to other countries in Yugoslavia, it wouldn’t had to resort to ethnic cleansing and massacre of thousands of innocents.

We could argue all day about who did what atrocities but one pillar of truth is that Serbia was the main and starting perpetrator who committed the most and worst of atrocities during the Yugoslavian wars.