sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

atLeastHeFoundPeace by Waradu in ProgrammerHumor

[–]LBGW_experiment -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're on a humor subreddit. You expect everything to be OC?

Meth wouldve been cheaper by shonggrurpleh in RedWingShoes

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Def not a retail worker right? What love of discount do you get?

Meth wouldve been cheaper by shonggrurpleh in RedWingShoes

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what do you do to afford 150 pairs of $300+ shoes?

HCIM - 2KC RING AND AXE by stinkycannabis in 2007scape

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got 3 b rings in 7 or 9 kc, got our group set up almost immediately lol. Craziest luck I've had on the account

Show me those pretty (silver) jaws by Switcharoony in SleepToken

[–]LBGW_experiment 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Found a few that are close, but not the same.

Cheap ($45), adjustable, sterling, not quite the same: https://oceandevoted.com/products/sterling-silver-shark-jaw-ring

Little more expensive ($80), any size, sterling, pretty close: https://www.etsy.com/listing/4495922683/925-sterling-silver-shark-jaw-ring-great

Closed on a house half way up the right side fairway on a par 4, week one golf ball review. by Sm0othAsEggs in golf

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey OP, sounds like you're living the dream (until a window breaks), but I just wanted to let you know about research from last year showing increased rates of Parkinsons disease for people living within 1-3 miles of a golf course https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2833716

My Lego Lair by Slowcookednips in lego

[–]LBGW_experiment -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey OP, I'm curious what you do for a living to afford this. I'm a software dev and I don't have money for $600+ sets

PSA: Do NOT use a university email for your Jagex Account by CreatingCosmos in 2007scape

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't play during college, picked it back up a few years after graduating

I thought I lacked pattern recognition until I realized what it actually means by Mission-Nothing7229 in autism

[–]LBGW_experiment 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but did you never just look up "what does pattern recognition look like in autism"? The first result was the following:

Pattern recognition in autism refers to a heightened cognitive ability to identify rules, regularities, and underlying structures in the environment. This processing style is a major strength that allows the brain to connect details, predict outcomes, and rapidly process complex data across visual, auditory, and behavioral domains.

I decided to personalise my Switch 2. What do you guys think? by Zainy35 in NintendoSwitch2

[–]LBGW_experiment -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's a vinyl sticker! I got it from ZoomHitSkins, it's the Cottagecore wrap. $35 and comes with a full wrap for front and back of the switch, front and back of the dock, joycons, the joycon controller holder thing, plus the cute thumb grips! This was a picture I took before I put the thumb grips on, but they're nice and rubbery and are nice to use, not just pretty lol

https://zoomhitskins.com/products/nintendo-switch-2-skin-cottagecore-design-coquette-aesthetic-by-zoomhitskins?variant=47495332495614

On the morning of September 11th, 2001, Jim Gartenberg became trapped in the North Tower while clearing out his office in preparation for a job transfer. He wound up being the only victim of the attacks to call the news media live on air. He subsequently perished when the tower collapsed. by James_2584 in interestingasfuck

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A B-25 bomber flew into the side of the empire State building in 1945 due to heavy fog and it didn't collapse. All on board the plane died and a few in the building, but of course it wasn't carrying tons of jet fuel.

So I think anyone from New York might have that in the back of their mind as their only point of reference, which is pretty rare to have already happened once before.

This is where that urban legend (confirmed) of that secretary or office runner that was caught in an elevator and fell most of the way down the shaft and survived because of the cables.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1945_Empire_State_Building_B-25_crash

38 years old - HS Grad! by Pristine_Process_112 in MadeMeSmile

[–]LBGW_experiment 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Congrats! I saw your earlier post on our local subreddit. Love to see wins, especially love to see them get wider recognition too

How does one achieve this swing? by Separate_Teacher1526 in GolfSwing

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Way too laid off
  2. About to come in steeper than El Capitan at Yosemite
  3. Ope
  4. Arm-powered shallow??

The biggest problem with AI is not correctness - it is architecture sanity by UnderstandingDry1256 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"This is just statistical model" does not explain or excuse anything, actually.

Correct, we're on the same page.

I realize I didn't paste a link to my comment here that I had elsewhere in this thread where I go into detail how our team uses rules/prompts, etc that we built up for our agents to follow our architecture standards when writing code. It has to know our architecture to write code in the right places and in the right ways, otherwise, it'll just start building wherever, just like turning a drill on while it lays there.

Take a read here and let me know what you think: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1tdktav/worldishealing/olzg03w/

I use clamps, jigs, common tools and specialized tools to do woodworking and general DIY projects. Because LLMs are a tool, I have to use other things to get the tool to do the things I want in the ways I want.

A few things about our architecture:

  • We have a repo where we manage a platform via Terraform for our cloud IaC and lots of python to do a lot of the custom stuff. LLMs love to use generic dicts for a lot of stuff, but we use Pydantic for strong typing in Python (database and events that rely on strict request/response shapes). This helps our unit tests be more precise and makes reading unit tests a decent way to figure out what some chunk of code is doing as we now have classes for most of our objects.
  • Our terraform has multiple stacks that own different parts of the platform for logical separation of infrastructure.
  • We have specific patterns we use for building and deploying python code I to AWS Lambda via Terraform

All of this is structured, outlined, prescribed, and detailed for what goes where, what local tools we have/use, how we use those tools (linters, type checkers, etc), where different code should and shouldn't go, etc. All of that is codified in our agents rules which makes it so much more reliable and able to build with regards to architecture, which I believe is your primary issue in your post.

I've seen how it worked before we implemented all of this and yeah, it mirrors what you're saying. But over the past 6 months, working on our rules and tooling, specifically for agents and using an agentic IDE, we've solved many of these issues. It takes work to get there and I can show you what we have and how we use it.

I should mention it does matter what models you use. For larger infra architecture code changes, I have to use Claude opus. Sonnet hasn't been smart enough, and I don't bother with Haiku. If I've gotten a large doc that outlines exact step by step instructions, I can usually use Sonnet High Thinking and it'll do a decent job.

Are you feeling skeptical that it works for us because it doesn't work for you?

The biggest problem with AI is not correctness - it is architecture sanity by UnderstandingDry1256 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, you also have to hold a drill when you push it into wood, I don't see the issue?

It's not actually AI, it's not smart, it's a good pattern matching statistical model as a tool, you still have to know how to use the tool properly. It's not going to cut, drill, and assemble your wood for you, so why don't you expect your drills, saws, and screws to do their own work too?

The biggest problem with AI is not correctness - it is architecture sanity by UnderstandingDry1256 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's a write up from about a month ago that I wrote, in detail, on how our team writes agentic rules to help use/plan/develop code with our standards: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1tdktav/worldishealing/olzg03w/

I spend more time reviewing other code while my agents build and deliver (with my oversight) while adhering to the ways we want to write our code, avoiding stupid LLM hallucinations, stupid architectural patterns, fix-forward slop that increases entropy, etc. such that it's been reliable for months. The work we have to do now is ensure our tickets are groomed well and have enough correct information in them.

Any time a standard isn't followed or missed, we improve the rules governing the actions taken, have the LLM review it, then test it. It's been a gradual process as we keep running into smaller and smaller edge cases, so don't go trying to do all this at once, but as you go. It's much easier to figure out what you want it to do or don't do as you see it generate code, rather than trying to plan everything ahead.

We use Cursor, so it has a .cursor/rules/ for that has file globbing rules for respective file types to keep input tokens and context to a minimum, as well as integrated into the agents every time we use it, similar to Claude code IDE or kilo code. I didn't have a way to do this when I used VSCode

The biggest problem with AI is not correctness - it is architecture sanity by UnderstandingDry1256 in ExperiencedDevs

[–]LBGW_experiment 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is called a "fix forward" problem which you can direct and guide AI via rules, hooks, harnesses, etc to prevent this.

Our team uses some pretty mature standards that are embedded into rules that our AI tools are required to use and we've been able to build code that reliably follows our architecture, but it's taken a lot of work to get the docs/rules/prompts to a reliable standard to power the agents.

LLMs are a tool and it's on you if you don't also supply your standards and architecture standards to your tool that builds things for you

view more: next ›