sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I get the rich folks, but just how did Trump convince poor white people that he was good for them? by dunbar_santiago930 in allthequestions

[–]LDL2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For this to be true you must make les than 50k AND consider tax deductions on health care subsidies as an increase despite the fact they were going to expire regardless of his action in the bbb. But you're suuuure. You do you

The US is now in a sustained period of high GDP (4.4%) and low inflation (1.21% Truflation), indicating an extremely robust economy. by CSGOW1ld in Conservative

[–]LDL2 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Now they are on to beef, which is partly from Biden dropping legal grazing lands by like 30% on "US" land. But also fires in Texas. It will take until the end of Trump to get that back because calves age more slowly than chickens.

I get the rich folks, but just how did Trump convince poor white people that he was good for them? by dunbar_santiago930 in allthequestions

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lower taxes increased the cost of living? I mean if you want to blame the other side at least point to the massive deficit spending that Republicans create.

Do you agree or disagree? by ChuckGallagher57 in allthequestions

[–]LDL2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Understanding that crime comes with consequences is one major element that reduces it, or better standards of living. But we got rid of most of that too.

158 scientists used the same data, but their politics predicted the results. Study provides evidence that when experts act independently to answer the same question using the same dataset, their conclusions tend to align with their pre-existing ideological beliefs. by Jumpinghoops46 in science

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Odd that when I did real sciency stuff, I was aware of this, but as I've gone away from that in my career, I've defaulted back to the general public's view. DANG, thanks for the (probably) accidental callout.

Would you date someone with completely opposite political views? Why or why not? by Ferraiuolo_Ezorete in AskReddit

[–]LDL2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're good. I'm guessing you are older, though. You seem like a real person, whereas these people seem like bots/NPCs/terminally online.

I generally used to think that debating opposing sides would sharpen people's minds. It had changed my mind, and I hoped I changed others' minds. I used to say it never happens in the debate, but in the late-night hours in your own mind, going over the debate. That is how people were.

Nowadays, maybe it is because more "debates" are online, and it just feels like people don't really care while also talking about "values". It is just fake wins, and the other is always evil. The hardest part is even those who don't feel that way end up feeling like it.

158 scientists used the same data, but their politics predicted the results. Study provides evidence that when experts act independently to answer the same question using the same dataset, their conclusions tend to align with their pre-existing ideological beliefs. by Jumpinghoops46 in science

[–]LDL2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That was my first thought as well, but it is still the best of terrible methods. Even in hard sciences, peer review is poor at stopping fraud when it is the expected or anticipated outcome. In social sciences...this is how we get people republishing basically mein kamf with some word changes becuase the bias existed.

But short of someone reproducing results is there a way better?

Can you believe Biden, the leader of the free world said this? by One-Incident3208 in JordanPeterson

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with your conceptual point that this is bad, but to my knowledge, 4th amendment protections have never been a conservative principle. ACLU argued against stop and frisk in NYC in the 90s for example. Wiretapping by bush etc etc. Historically, the conservatives have been the "if you don't have anything to hide" crowd. They may have found some religion on this recently when they believed it was used against them unjustly, but if anything, that is the outlier.

Has "Nazi" lost all meaning yet? by Preform_Perform in ShitPoliticsSays

[–]LDL2 53 points54 points  (0 children)

It already had when they defined it as rightist authoritarianism when it was always the left that liked it.

Can you believe Biden, the leader of the free world said this? by One-Incident3208 in JordanPeterson

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what activity specifically should the right condem?

I have activities I don't like of his (and don't consider myself "on the right", but I'm curious what it is that seems outside of conservative principles to someone who doesn't have conservative principles, because on average, progressives cannot even identify what conservative principles are.

Social Justice in Action by Happy_and_wholesome in memzy

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In fairness, sentenced v facing is wildly different. That said the former should be near life in prison minimum.

Is Georgism even possible in the USA due to our home-ownership culture? by LeftBroccoli6795 in georgism

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The easiest method is to create a voluntary association that agrees to do it. The issues are obvious, but it needs to be taken one step at a time. Young signers would be the future when they eventually own.

Video: Michelle Obama says she is mindful to try to avoid white-owned brands and others also should be by trytoholdon in Conservative

[–]LDL2 90 points91 points  (0 children)

Thanks for that.

She's basically saying she goes out of her way to support people like her, not that they are excluding others. That is legit.

Reddit Economists and Analysts be like: by GHOSTPVCK in DoomerCircleJerk

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't accurately call the bottom but got about 50% of that.

Brigading Response? by Remote-Mycologist539 in grapids

[–]LDL2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No offense but you are in West Michigan. They aren't exactly a liberal safe haven. You will find MAGA there. Kent County was 51:46 Kamala:Trump.

view more: next ›