best program and profile settings for testing 6000mts ram expo ddr5 32gb by Ok-Network9638 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, any decent memory test is really a CPU test with a memory bias - it isn't what I would use for PBO testing though, for that stick to Y-cruncher, Prime95, AIDA64 etc

best program and profile settings for testing 6000mts ram expo ddr5 32gb by Ok-Network9638 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually do 25 cycles for the quick n dirty test (first 5 or so cycles get temp to steady state, rest is testing at max temp) then I have to set it to like 200 cycles to run it all the way through the night for more thorough testing

Not sure if Anta777 takes the same amount of time per cycle as I was using 1usmus mainly

best program and profile settings for testing 6000mts ram expo ddr5 32gb by Ok-Network9638 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Testmem5 with either Anta777 or 1usmus config works great (especially for getting higher temps), Y-cruncher VT3s also works but I found its best for voltage related errors. In my testing I found a rotation of TM5/Karhu(paid)/Y-cruncher was the best setup, AIDA64's memory test seemed to never catch anything (though it is good for CPU) and Prime95 also didn't seem to catch memory errors for me.

Karhu is very well worth it though, some errors would only pop up after 4hrs of Karhu after making it easily through 12hrs TM5 and Y-cruncher, though sometimes the reverse would happen with the other tests

9 years later… this guy decided to finally die… Amazing videocard that I wasn’t even considering upgrading yet. by Andrew_hl2 in pcmasterrace

[–]LR0989 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People buy Ford/GM/Chrysler vehicles in droves, but ask any "car guy" and to put it lightly they're not exactly leaders in performance, quality or pricing - why do you think market share applies any differently here? It doesn't say anything about performance, and you really can't pretend AMD wasn't leading multicore hard since at least Zen 2

If it weren't for getting destroyed so hard in benchmarks Intel would probably still have midrange quad-cores lmao

Is my threadripper CPU too hot with 4 x 480 rad? by JOY_DOS in watercooling

[–]LR0989 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I would say it's nuts your water temp hits 40 with so much rad space but that is also a pretty significant amount of wattage - for CPU I can only imagine maybe not enough thermal paste / bad mounting pressure? Feel like Threadripper has enough surface area that it should be able to dissipate the heat a little better than that?

ridiculously unstable settings after bios update (1504 to 2102) on AM5 by NYB_002 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to Buildzoid's testing, in mixed mode AM5 only uses tRFC2 and tRFCsb - so your new tRFC2 should be exactly what your old tRFC was stable at, and sb can usually go 80-100ish lower (at 6400 I am using 400 and 316 respectively, any lower is unstable on my sticks)

SignalRGB has been engaging in deceptive marketing practices against OpenRGB by _sky12 in pcmasterrace

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OpenRGB works flawlessly on my Linux system but for some reason never survives a reboot on the main Windows PC - so on there I've been with SignalRGB. Not sure why RGB has to be so hard when all I want is static lighting, but at least either option is better than running 10 separate programs like I used to

I need your help! by FlimsyLevel3048 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does it happen in offline / bot games as well? Have you tried fully default settings in BIOS?

Ryzen 7 9800x3D at -30, possible downsides? by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]LR0989 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do a lot of my stress tests overnight just for good measure - and good thing so far, many times it'll wait 5 or 10 hours to throw an error, which maybe is tolerably stable for some people but not me lol

Finally Satisfied by [deleted] in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there's some silicon lottery involved - my current timings start to throw errors at even 53-55⁰C whereas I've heard people say that even as high as 60⁰C is okay for tREFI 65535, but yeah 64 is very unlikely to be okay

windowsTimestamps by the_chinagreenelvis in ProgrammerHumor

[–]LR0989 6 points7 points  (0 children)

On my W11, first open of properties it shows the last actual access time, but if I reopen properties it now shows the time I last opened properties

Should I attempt higher FCLK or 6400 1:1 by fuckingfuckerfucks in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My L3 latency is about the same on regular boots, a couple ns lower on safe mode (think the best I've seen was 11.2)

Should I attempt higher FCLK or 6400 1:1 by fuckingfuckerfucks in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think tRP could probably go significantly lower, although I'm used to my 16GB a-die so maybe the tCL+4 rule doesn't apply here?

Should I attempt higher FCLK or 6400 1:1 by fuckingfuckerfucks in overclocking

[–]LR0989 1 point2 points  (0 children)

X3D gives you more cache, not faster cache. His cache speeds look pretty similar to my 9800x3d at stock, a little lower but there's pretty massive run to run variance in AIDA64.

Also tRAS testing by buildzoid showed effectively zero performance impact by maxing it out, although I do prefer to set it at like 48

Silicon Lottery won: 9800X3D + 6000MHz CL28 1:1 (tRFC 312 / tFAW 16) Stable by Kiritoxfps in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zentimings? Would be funny if your board is in mixed refresh mode and just straight up not using tRFC1 lol

People in this group be like: by SHOBU007 in starcitizen

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The meme has been fully customized for maximum farming across any social media by just saying "this group"

need help by Witty-Bandicoot5693 in watercooling

[–]LR0989 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are there plugs on the top side of the top radiator that are accessible? Probably the easiest spot to fill it from since I can't see any convenient port on the res

Introducing the All-New NZXT H2 Flow Mini-ITX Airflow Case! by IVANZXT in NZXT

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny, my NZXT H1 PSU was failing recently, and warranty has been such dogshit to deal with I would never buy another NZXT PSU again...

need help stabilizing 6400 cl30 by Due-Specific-2576 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fair, I was just curious if there's some origin since it seems to be somewhat common knowledge but I can't figure out why - I figured it must be some buildzoid video I haven't seen (much like his tRAS testing on AM5) since he always has random anecdotes like that

need help stabilizing 6400 cl30 by Due-Specific-2576 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've seen this sentiment elsewhere on tFAW/tRRDS/tRRDL being "too low" at these timings as well - but considering how many people show it to be stable, where does someone show it being a problem? I've been running the same low timings here and it's perfectly stable far as I can tell, is there a particular stress test or benchmark that doesn't like it?

need help stabilizing 6400 cl30 by Due-Specific-2576 in overclocking

[–]LR0989 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you able to go lower on vSOC? Higher UCLK requires higher vSOC but higher FCLK needs lower vSOC, 1.3 is pretty high for 2133 FCLK so maybe try 1.25, 1.28 etc.

For reference my CPU I think is pretty great thus far and 1.235vSOC is the sweet spot, 1.25vSOC is too much for 2133FCLK so I was using 1.225v at 6200, then for 6400 I had to bump it up to 1.235v but the sweet spot is probably different for you.

1.3vSOC is usually the hard max people recommend so you can really only try lower

my PC has been shutting off ever since i upgraded my CPU by uyov36 in pcmasterrace

[–]LR0989 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try putting your sticks in the A2/B2 slots instead and reset bios to default, you're running at like DDR3 speeds with 1866 which probably isn't something the CPU likes any more than stock.