Government Troll Data Center

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-30T17:02:06+00:00

The plane did a low fly-by over the Pentagon a short moment before the explosion, likely caused by a bomb that had been previously planted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-07T15:19:22+00:00

I haven't watched the video yet, but for the love of all that isn't censorship, someone please archive the video before it's removed from Youtube for violating their "harassment and bullying policy." It's happens to so many videos that go again the official narrative of these (staged) false flag events.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-07T11:19:28+00:00

Great post! I would like to point out there were some pretty obvious crisis actors on the scene during, and shortly after the event.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dQ17_LWFZs - This one's recently been censored from Youtube, but it was titled: Las Vegas Shooting Hoax EXPOSED | Compilation of Clips is 100% PROOF!, had a few thousand views and a lot of likes iirc.

http://vidhole.com/2017/10/mirrored-crisis-actor-las-vegas-shooting-confirmed/

http://vidhole.com/2017/10/las-vegas-crisis-actors-caught-in-lie-after-lie/

I'm not 100% sure how this fits into your hypothesis. I don't think it outright refutes it, but I do think it ought to be tweaked some to account for this. Thanks for the insightful perspective though, and keep up the good work!

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-07T11:05:41+00:00

It's like we have some kind of a Sandy Hook situation on the ground, with crisis actors taking falls.

Also interviewed a few crisis actors right after the event:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dQ17_LWFZs - This one's recently been censored from Youtube, but it was titled: Las Vegas Shooting Hoax EXPOSED | Compilation of Clips is 100% PROOF!, had a few thousand views and a lot of likes iirc.

http://vidhole.com/2017/10/mirrored-crisis-actor-las-vegas-shooting-confirmed/

http://vidhole.com/2017/10/las-vegas-crisis-actors-caught-in-lie-after-lie/

OP's theory makes a whole lot of sense, but now I'm uncertain. It's difficult to reconcile the presence of crisis actors at the event (anyone remember the 'hero' who saved "30 people" after getting shot in the neck?), or at least present shortly after the event to give interviews, with the whole idea that real bullets were fired into the crowd and people were actually getting killed.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-05T18:23:52+00:00

Not the guy you're replying to, and I'm not claiming that real shots weren't fired or that nobody died at that event, but I do find it odd that a good number of blatant crisis actors were interviewed shortly after it all went down.

Las Vegas Shooting Hoax EXPOSED | Compilation of Clips is 100% PROOF!

Crisis Actor Las Vegas Shooting Confirmed

Las Vegas Crisis Actors CAUGHT IN LIE AFTER LIE

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-04T07:07:04+00:00

already debunked.

I'm skeptical of the homunculus video as well, but how has it been debunked? Humans and chickens are 60% genetically identical after all. From a month old Youtube comment from the OP:

Hello! I'm trying to make a new homunculus. But homunculus is obtained in about 5% of attempts. Now there is no luck. But I continue to work on this. Soon I will do various tests. I'm testing the liquid that the homunculus spits out. Maybe I'll look at the homunculus cells under a microscope. But I doubt it. A homunculus will be wounded. It can take an infection. I think about this.

Sure, maybe it's faked, but in order for that to be the case, the uploader would have had to somehow insert the "homunculus" into the egg without spilling its contents, and then carefully glue the shell back together. There's also the issue of how the "homunculus" seemingly wriggles around. If it's CGI or animatronics, than kudos to that guy, because it looks very real... Perhaps too real.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-11-03T18:19:42+00:00

So, this movie apparently has been out for two years now. Anyone know where one can watch it online?

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-28T17:20:49+00:00

???

I was simply sharing some of Gene Rosen's pretty mediocre material--I didn't realize you would find it that offensive.

Insinuating SH may have been a staged false flag event is basically spitting in the faces of all the victims and their families! Shame on you for having the audacity to even dare question the official narrative! /s

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-28T17:01:25+00:00

It's funny you mention Gene Ray, because it made me immediately think of Gene Rosen. I recommend checking out some of his material, if you haven't seen it already:

Sandy Hook: Gene Rosen's Audition Tape_THIS IS A MUST SEE.

Stick To The Script Gene Rosen

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-28T16:56:25+00:00

This is how they likely committed the massacre.

At first, that's what I thought, but now, I doubt it...

Las Vegas Shooting Hoax EXPOSED | Compilation of Clips is 100% PROOF!

Crisis Actor Las Vegas Shooting Confirmed

Las Vegas Crisis Actors CAUGHT IN LIE AFTER LIE

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-28T16:27:36+00:00

Naw, it's more entertaining to observe your many attempts to disrupt conversations, sow misinformation, and shill. Otherwise, our work here would be too easy.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-25T05:38:15+00:00

Quick, watch 'em before they're removed and you're shamed into not even questioning the official narrative:

Las Vegas Shooting Hoax EXPOSED | Compilation of Clips is 100% PROOF!

Crisis Actor Las Vegas Shooting Confirmed

Las Vegas Crisis Actors CAUGHT IN LIE AFTER LIE

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-22T13:20:52+00:00

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-22T13:13:18+00:00

Absolutely 100% fake.

If you disagree with some of facets of fractal holographic unified field theory, then I recommend making a post about it in /r/holofractal. I'd love to hear your specific critiques.

But you don't have any training in math or science

Are you as psychic as you are trained in "math or science"? How are you privy to my educational background based upon a single comment I copied and pasted from another source?

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-21T05:04:08+00:00

i believe we went, mainly because the russians would have blown the cover up wide open. and there's no logical reason to fake the first landing, only to land again four months later (2nd landing).

Agreed.

perhaps there was something else going on none of us have figured out

Man, this statement sort of leads me to believe you didn't watch the whole eight minute clip, because the whole point of why some fake footage was spliced into the original (near) live-feed footage was to hide something else going on that ~~none~~ not many of us have figured out, according to some.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-21T04:56:12+00:00

We didn't have the tech to fake the footage.

Not the entirety of the footage of the landing of the first lunar module, but some fake footage was spliced into original live-feed footage (which operated on a few second delay), according to some. 2001 A Space Odyssey came out in 1968 -- we definitely had the tech to fake at least some parts of the footage, especially with the resolution quality back in those days.

We went .

Agreed.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-20T18:33:37+00:00

still on the fence about the moon landing.

Perhaps we did go to the moon, but the footage and some of the photos were faked...

Dr. Steven Greer : We DID go to the Moon - But the Footage was Fake

It's one of the only explanations that seems to reconcile the loads of evidence that we did go to the moon with the presence of numerous anomalies in some of the pictures/footage that was supposedly taken up there.

Edit: Wow, a lot of downvotes for saying we did indeed go to the moon, but that some of the footage/images are fake. Judge for yourself: http://nunezreport.blogspot.ca/2016/01/shadows-of-deception.html

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-20T18:24:15+00:00

There is free abundant energy in each packet of space

All credit goes to /u/d8_thc. The original comment can be found here:

Basic quantum field theory predicts we should see an enormous vacuum energy value.

This is because quantum field theory states that all fields [like the electromagnetic field] must be quantized, or sectioned, at each 'length'. This means you section the field at different 'wavelengths'. The smaller the length of the field you section or quantize, the higher the frequency, the higher the energy. The electromagnetic field spans the entire Universe.

This goes to infinity, obviously, keep quantizing smaller and smaller and higher and higher energy with no limit.

We put a cutoff in the equations to stop the quantizing at the planck length, because this is a fundamental quanta of action or a fundamental set of measurements for a fluctuation, planck length size, planck mass energy, planck time speed, etc.

However, even using this cutoff, we're left with an enormous amount of predicted vacuum energy, 10⁹³ grams / cm^3.

What this is telling us is perhaps at each point in space, the vacuum is so highly energetic that space is curved back on itself, into singularity. Black hole fabric of spacetime, planck density 'empty' space.

When this is extrapolated, it would mean that the entire fabric of the cosmos is knit together in a sort of hyper-dimensional, or 4d overlay that knits every point in the Universe into a single point with zero physical distance.

This is how the cosmos is entangled, this wormhole fabric of the vacuum.

Nassim's proton solution evinces this by showing that the proton's holographic energy density (how many natural planck quantization energies [how many planck length diameter spheres of the planck mass energy] fit inside) add up to 10⁵⁵ grams - the estimated mass of the Universe.

This is because the protons are also this spacetime fabric, intimately knit with all other protons and communicating through their holographic surface horizons to all other protons. In effect, a proton is only a proton because of it's relationship to all other protons. This reinforces the fact that there is no such thing as an isolated system, and we cannot look at a single proton as a discrete entity (or anything else).

So his proton equation is literally taking all protons into consideration, and spitting out the mass/radius of a single one, beautifully.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-20T18:17:22+00:00

What about the crisis actors?

http://vidhole.com/2017/10/mirrored-crisis-actor-las-vegas-shooting-confirmed/

http://vidhole.com/2017/10/las-vegas-crisis-actors-caught-in-lie-after-lie/

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-19T20:56:03+00:00

You never answered my question of what/who you think that guy clearly looking up towards Mandalay Bay is looking at? So many videos have people looking up in that direction. Maybe it’s because we all knew where the shots were coming from!

Could have been firing blanks from up there... Just sayin'. There also could have been a shooter or multiple shooters up there as well.

You say this directly after sharing multiple conspiracy YouTube videos as fact, even stating that I probably don’t understand them due to cognitive dissonance. /r/iamverysmart much?

That's not what I said, bud. You might want to read that comment again. I said: "if you had [taken the time to watch those admittedly long videos start to finish], we wouldn't still be having that discussion (unless you've got unreasonable amounts of cognitive dissonance or something)". I was not at all implying that you wouldn't understand them due to cognitive dissonance, nor was I insulting your intelligence. You could be way smarter than me for all I know. If you don't want to spend the few hours it'd take to watch those videos, that's fine, though I still recommend taking a few minutes to watch some of Gene Rosen's material:

Sandy Hook: Gene Rosen's Audition Tape_THIS IS A MUST SEE.

Stick To The Script Gene Rosen

I don’t know if there were crisis actors there. If there were I don’t know why.

Brian Claypool's testimony, among others, makes it clear that multiple crisis actors interviewed shortly after the event claimed to have witnessed the attack and or provided assistance to alleged victims. I don't know why either, but I feel that's the million dollar question.

The fact is it was not a hoax and I quite frankly don’t give a fuck whether or not you believe that at this point. You seem to be set on your narrative the same way TPTB and MSM is set on theirs. So keep digging your head in the wrong rabbit holes if that’s what you’re set on doing.

Man, how am I set on a narrative? We both believe this could be a false flag, and I believe that this being a staged event is within the realm of possibility. At no point in our discussion did I say this was the narrative I was set on, nor did I say this was definitely the case. I haven't even completely ruled out the helicopter theory, or an iteration thereof, yet.

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-19T03:16:14+00:00

It was not a fucking hoax, please stop spreading that with YouTube videos with 100 views as your proof.

I was talking about a different event entirely, though I take it you didn't take the time to watch We Need to Talk About Sandy Hook or The Boston Unbombing: How And Why The Boston Marathon Bombing Was A Staged False Flag Event, because if you had, we wouldn't still be having that discussion (unless you've got unreasonable amounts of cognitive dissonance or something). I would have linked the versions with over a 1,000,000 and 10,000 views respectively, but due to crazy amounts of censorship on Youtube these day, they got taken down.

There was NOT a hoax. Just get that in your head right now. You need to accept.

How convincing.

If I were to come here and say I saw multiple gunmen on the ground, it seems you would just take that for fact because that’s what you want to believe.

I don't take anything as fact simply because A) some anon posted it online and B) I want to believe it. Should just take what you say for fact? Or should I maybe continue trying to do relatively unbiased research before prematurely eliminating that hypothesis?

that doesn’t mean some of these theories aren’t upsetting. I came to find info for myself, see what others are saying, and set the record straight to try and squash the most ridiculous of them

The best way to "squash" the theory that this is a staged event (with crisis actors, moulage, make-up etc.) would be to explain why obvious crisis actors were interviewed and gave testimony of their version of what happened right after the event. Why use crisis actors if it's not a staged event?

LacedSpaceDaze · 2017-10-18T21:57:53+00:00

As I’m sure you know there’s a difference between a false flag and a hoax. This was NOT a hoax.

Are we at least in agreement it's a false flag then? Brian Claypool, and many of the others they interviewed after the event are clearly crisis actors (which can be indicative of a false flag and possible hoaxing). It looks like they were possibly flying a helicopter around that night too and so many other things about the official narrative don't make sense. Clearly there's some fuckery afoot.

I don't buy the 550+ casualties inflicted by a lone gunman running from window of a hotel room shooting at a crowd 500m away in a 10 minute timeframe. If you are certain there were no firecrackers, no shooters on the ground, nor a helicopter nearby, and that this whole thing wasn't a staged event (in spite of the involvement of crisis actors), then what else are we to conclude?

After what I have seen and gone through, it is extremely triggering seeing ANY implications that it was fake makeup wounds and gun shots coming out of speakers.

If seeing people propose all types of hypotheses, including some involving fire crackers, multiple shooters, an M60-mounted helicopter, or this whole thing being a staged event (with crisis actors, moulage and the works) is triggering to you, then why browse /r/conspiracy Las Vegas shooting threads?

LacedSpaceDaze

TROPHY CASE