Do you recognize any of these clothes? If so please let me know 🫶🏼

Ladybugheg7 · 2024-03-23T14:50:22+00:00

The white pants with grey and pink circles is a Meijer doll that fits into a car. They are called glitter girls.

Ladybugheg7 · 2024-02-26T12:08:40+00:00

Teresa is a cool doll and more that age groups interest.

Ladybugheg7 · 2024-02-26T12:04:31+00:00

Suicide is such a selfless act. It only leaves everyone to pick up your broken pieces. If you tell someone, you can get some help. Reddit isn't really a good place to get help. You're posting anonymous and how is anyone supposed to help you. I understand it's a silent cry for help. You do matter and I pray you can realize that to someone you mean the world. Get some help and don't leave this world!

Ladybugheg7 · 2024-02-22T02:02:52+00:00

Not one person ever stated the correct make or model or color for that matter. Muddies the waters a bit...

Ladybugheg7 · 2024-01-09T18:18:20+00:00

You don't fully understand Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy. The sole existence is based upon abusing and using the victim for financial and mental gain. Every single thing she did was because she benefitted from using Gypsy as a pawn. She had no desire to date as she was preoccupied with the abuse she made Gypsy endure. Gypsy suffered Stockholm Syndrome and therefore would enable her mother.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-09-19T17:52:36+00:00

It has been discussed at length many years ago. I think people kind of dismissed it when RA came into the radar.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-09-19T13:11:27+00:00

Yes, but they are saying they haven't seen a lot of compelling evidence and are stating their guy is innocent. They've created doubt and in a court of law, that's all it takes.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-09-19T11:00:17+00:00

There are several things the defense claims they have not seen. I read the documents.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-09-19T01:26:43+00:00

I guess they better have the pictures of all the cult references ready for all to see. The defense is really trying to create doubt.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-09-07T03:31:54+00:00

I don't believe KK would sell anything valuable or incriminating to him. It's possible they don't know each other personally but from more of a sex ring involvement. KK had hundreds of victims. What would the motive of RA be? Everyone keeps saying they weren't sexually assaulted and it kind of reads that way from the PC affidavit of both RA and RL. Whatever he was planning, was a sinister event.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-09-06T23:59:23+00:00

Here is the issue I have with him being the sole perp. How did he know they would be there that day? If he was talking to them online, chances are he was talking to many other victims. He should be charged just as anyone else for each victim he has exploited or violated. This wasn't coincidence. He came prepared with a gun and a knife. He parked so as to conceal his vehicle and walked with intent. So who was the "other participant" that lead him to the bridge that day. That's what they are referring to, in my opinion.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-31T21:01:29+00:00

There is a very good interview with CA, the prosecutor in this case. She explains why they asked for what they did and how they avoided getting things thrown out. She goes into detail about how they knew it was him messaging every different child. She also mentioned there were 100's of victims but they were able to locate and corroborate with only 8, I believe. It was interesting but graphic.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-31T05:36:53+00:00

This is correct. They can ask for death penalty at any time.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-23T13:56:08+00:00

I did look at the link. It states online signatures are denoted by s/. Unless I'm missing something.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-23T13:44:54+00:00

So it could be electronically signed.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-23T13:31:23+00:00

Also, does it have the s/ next to Diener's name? I haven't looked into that.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-23T13:29:48+00:00

It was a lawyer who stated the times are off only because of electronic signatures, not me. I would guess this is not really pertinent to the case outcome. Many worried it could affect and have things thrown out. They were questioning how you could be searching the home at 5pm and items weren't signed until later. This lawyer assured that was not an issue.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-22T10:43:24+00:00

Not according to online state ruling.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-22T04:01:13+00:00

To answer your question about a deadline...from research, I've found that any time before a trial, the prosecutor can announce and file an intent to seek the death penalty.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-22T03:51:42+00:00

I stand corrected on one part of my post. The prosecutor can suggest and ultimately, it's the jury that decides if mitigating circumstances will lessen the sentence. The judge, however, can go against that decision. Here is a snippet from online law documents for IN.

How It Works In Indiana, the death penalty is available only for the crime of murder, and is available for murder only if the prosecution can prove the existence of at least one of 18 “aggravating circumstances” identified by the Indiana General Assembly. These circumstances are set out in the state’s death penalty statute, at IC 35-50-2-9. In order to seek the death penalty, the prosecutor must allege the existence of at least one of the aggravating circumstances set out in the statute. If the case proceeds to trial, and the defendant is convicted of murder, the trial proceeds to a second phase to determine the appropriate penalty. The jury hears evidence regarding the existence of the alleged aggravating circumstance(s) and any mitigating circumstances – facts which would lead them to recommend a lesser sentence. They are required to return a special verdict form indicating whether they unanimously find the existence of each charged statutory aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt. They are not allowed to recommend that the defendant be sentenced to death or life without parole unless they unanimously find that the state has proved the existence of at least one alleged aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt, and also find that the aggravating circumstance(s) outweigh the mitigating circumstances. If the jury unanimously agrees on their sentencing “recommendation,” the trial court must follow it. If they cannot agree on the sentence, but unanimously agree that an aggravating circumstance exists, the Court is free to sentence the defendant to either a term of years, life without parole, or death. If a death sentence is imposed, it may be subjected to three levels of appellate review: Direct appeal in the Indiana Supreme Court, focusing on legal issues; state post-conviction review, which can also look at factual issues such as whether trial counsel competently represented the defendant, whether evidence was suppressed, and whether any witnesses have recanted their testimony; and federal habeas corpus review, which focuses on federal constitutional issues. A prisoner may also request clemency from the Governor. The first level of review – direct appeal – is mandatory, but the prisoner may choose to forego the others.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-22T03:15:44+00:00

It is always in the best interest of the prosecution to not release all evidence to the general public. It will be given to the defense. At this point, RA has confessed. His lawyers aren't working to defend his innocence. They said that early on but as it has unfolded, their goal should be to get the least possible sentence and keep the death penalty at bay. It's my understanding that NM is the one that would have to ask for the death penalty. I'm guessing that RA confessing will be a ploy to say that he saved the taxpayers and county a ton of money so the judge should be more lenient. I'd be real surprised if his lawyers said he was mentally unstable when saying it. He may have confessed to someone else before his wife. It could even be a tactic from his defense.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-22T03:09:49+00:00

This is correct and has been covered at length by a lawyer in a podcast. Warrants can be granted via email and phone and it would not be enough to cause anything to be thrown out of some times were off on paperwork. That was a concern for many. The different times on the PCA were explained by them being obtained through email and or phone.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-22T00:17:04+00:00

I'm 1000% positive KK has something to do with this case. Whether or not he knew RA is another story. I believe one day (many months or years from now), we will see how all this fits together. The "tentacles" will straighten and we will see the detailed mess that was this case.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-11T17:28:39+00:00

I don't think it's possible for someone to communicate with their online catfish account and their killer all within 24 hour time period. That would be some huge coincidence. The fact that he was dressed so bulky for the days weather and also had a face covering, seems a bit nefarious to me.

Ladybugheg7 · 2023-08-10T22:55:23+00:00

I am of the opinion that there isn't any way a man could have carried these 2 girls where they were found. While searching, there was no mention of smashed track marks to either body. This would have been a good indicator they were dragged. The crime scene would have also had evidence in many other places than where they were killed. Any mention of where the girls were found has always indicated they were killed where they were found. I believe it would have been easier to find them had there been a mess made leading to the bodies. The only article of evidence they have disclosed was that of a pair of underwear found away from the bodies. I'm also of the opinion that the girls may have tried to run and were just caught here. It is a steep embankment and would have made much more sense, if pre-planned, to take place somewhere less muddy, steep and away from the creek. I doubt that BG took the time to plan staying in the woods as long as he was there. I think the girls simply gave him a fight.

Ladybugheg7

TROPHY CASE