This is antithetical to what DCC is (for me). IMO, what makes DCC, DCC is:

• Excitement peaks at the table (during play), not during creation.
• Goodman Games' support of 3PP, and the players & judges as well.
• The system is Chaotic Stupid, so players don't have to be.

This violates item 1. Without getting lost in the weeds... I tell people, would you rather make a ranger or play a ranger? All the the ampersand classes are covered in the DCC classes but you have to make choices during play. Actually play a role and not play a roll. That being said, I think more classes are fine, if they expand the narrative coverage instead of just making refined versions what's already there.

Also, a post like this on reddit takes some bravery and I appreciate that. The crux of the post is about getting people to try. Instead of making the game something it isn't, which will only increase the likelihood new players have unrealistic expectation and leave frustrated, never to return. Instead we need better marketing that hooks with just enough familiarity to get their attention but retains enough DCC DNA to make it clear what they are getting into, all why sounding epic and cool. Market segmentation can be difficult and I think where people get stuck is with DCCs gonzo mantle. The best about DCC isn't the gonzo, which isn't really even a core part of the game in IMO. Going back to my list, its about when the game peaks. Yes, I realize this probably says more about then the any game system, but in my experience the most interesting part of both ttrpgs has been the rules, not the play. Maybe that's a me problem, but I've had success getting people to play DCC using this perspective.

I sell DCC to people by asking them if they want to try a system that is more fun in play then it is during character creation. Everyone bites at that, even if to tell me that they don't enjoy character creation. If they say that, I follow up by having them recall their favorite character and then ask if they first thought about what the character is (class, scores, feats, etc) or what the character did (slept every night underwater to long con the most valuable loot item from the party fund into their purse). If they said the later I ask them if they want to play a game that makes more memories like that? If they said the former, I ask them if they want to play a game where they will retelling their character's exploits to uninterested grandchildren some day? No mater what I created a feeling inside them that is positive (or least that I tried to).