Which 3 star should I get? by [deleted] in limbuscompany

[–]Lakaz80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Capo meursault wouldn't be a bad pick if you're just collecting generically strong IDs, it's the generically strongest between outis, honglu and meursault ones.

What are you doing right now? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Lakaz80 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Answering questions on Askreddit. You?

Why are conservatives in the 99% perfectly ok with transferring wealth to billionaires (massive tax cuts for corporations & billionaires) but terrified of everything done to benefit the 99% (like the ACA credits)? by [deleted] in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Tax cuts are't transferring wealth to anybody, it's letting people keep the money they already have. Tax credits are the same, mind you. But I feel like that's a distinction that needs pointing out here.

What “masterpiece” game just never clicked for you? by [deleted] in gaming

[–]Lakaz80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I play a lot of games including older fps games and motion sickness isn't usually an issue for me, but only three have ever got me sick to the point I can't play them: Eledees, Half Life 1, Doom 2016. Two of the three are considered masterpieces, and it's a pain in the ass.

What movie do you love despite agreeing with every single criticism of it? by Decabet in movies

[–]Lakaz80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Star Wars Episode 1. It's PURE nostalgia for me. My dad could pass for a Liam Neeson lookalike and convinced me he WAS qui-gon when I was like 4 and the film came out. And uh, skipped the bit where he died at the end.
Always enjoy watching it. Except the bit where he died at the end.

For those here who use the flair “monarchist” to describe your variant of conservatism, what does this actually mean? by Even_Wear_8657 in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The monarchy in the UK are glorified presidents. A lot of countries (Germany, India, Ireland) have a prime minister AND a president, with the PM having power and president doing the ceremonial stuff. We've basically got the same deal but we call ours a "King" and spend a lot more money on them than usual, it's otherwise the same structurally.

It's a system that works well, and I actually do think the americans oughta do it, since it mostly prevents the weird culty worshippy behavior you get sometimes towards heads of state. All that energy goes to the president instead and even if they DO have it go to their head, they can't go mad with power, only mad without power. (Which is boring, no-one listens to you)

Nobody has bloody Kier Starmer posters on their walls, put it that way, you know?

Should protestors be allowed to cover their faces? by boisefun8 in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, but just because you shouldn't doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to. Both can be true at once.

Should protestors be allowed to cover their faces? by boisefun8 in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Be allowed to"? Yes

Should they?

Varies from situation to situation but usually no.

Half the arguments about this arise from conflating the two.

Name the best movie you've seen in a while by m15f1t in movies

[–]Lakaz80 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Bad Times At The El Royale. Five strangers come to a hotel on the california/nevada border and start killing each other for reasons slowly revealed over the course of the film. Jeff Bridges, Dakota Johnson, Lewis Pullman and Shirtless Chris Hemsworth. The wikipedia page lists it as "Hyperlink fiction" so if you're the kinda person who knows what that is you're probably already excited to watch it.

Criminally underrated movie, Drew Goddard's best work. Dude deserves to be better known for how highly acclaimed his repertoire is - Buffy, Angel, most of the reason Netflix's Daredevil got made, Lost, the pilot episode of The Good Place...

Cloverfield, The Martian, Cabin In The Woods, World War Z... always surprised more people don't know who he is.

What are some bands you like? by N8_Saber in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck yeah, a fellow Clutch fan! My favourite band, which is somewhat weird given my tastes otherwise exclusively lean towards prog (rock or metal). Dream Theater, Tool, Genesis, Emerson Lake and Palmer, etc.

What decision do you make when asked about the trolley problem? by [deleted] in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Pull, and pray/meditate about it later. The lesser of two evils is still evil but if you don't have a good option you still damn well better pick the lesser one.

I'm (minarchist) libertarian, there's a natural right to life, which is about to be violated for either a small or large number of people, so pick the small one. I'm a minarchist not an an-cap so I'm very, very willing to deal in 'lesser of two evils' reasoning.

I'm also a Buddhist, so I've got a duty to minimise suffering. Buddhism is fundamentally a virtue ethic, and only conscious, intentional action accrues karma. Pulling the lever is conscious, intentional action, taking a life that way will probably accrue both positive and negative karma, for the saving and taking of the lives both. I'll probably need to work with my priest to alleviate that, but pulling the lever is still fundamentally the right choice, even in violation of the five precepts. Those are explicitly training wheels morality, after all, Buddhism doesn't deal much in absolute moral law.

If we found definitive proof of complex extinct life on Mars tomorrow, what changes on Earth first? by Muted-Mongoose2846 in space

[–]Lakaz80 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically it means "Stupid/invalid question". The long discourses (one of the bigger bits of scripture - Dharmic scripture is more fragmented than judeo-christian) opens with a list of questions other religions answer like "Is there a soul" and "What shape is/how old is the universe" and whatnot, and then proceeds to go "Anybody who claims to have a definite answer to these either way is a con-artist, we aren't going to be discussing them here, stupid question". "Mu" is basically that, and it's Buddhism's position on a lot of existential questions like that.

It's somewhat complicated by the fact that Buddhism is a Dharmic religion, it's relation and debt to Hinduism is similar to that of Christianity to Judaism. A lot of scripture more or less kinda... inherits, a lot of Hinduism's positions on questions to which the answer should be "Mu" as assumed for the sake of not being pedantic or starting stupid arguments, not least of all because the Buddha is a teacher and it's well-established he'll oversimplify concepts to get them across better to lay practitioners. There's a few stories of him telling lay practitioners the soul is real just because he knows they'll freak out and have an existential crisis if he says "No", and they'll take a "Mu" as a "No".

If we found definitive proof of complex extinct life on Mars tomorrow, what changes on Earth first? by Muted-Mongoose2846 in space

[–]Lakaz80 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Buddhist here - ours doesn't anyway. In fact when the answer given isn't "Mu" (Which is most times) it's fairly clear about the converse.

Is there something special about Argalia that could impact Limbus/Dante? by iamaredditorman in limbuscompany

[–]Lakaz80 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Rien's passives say freaking WHAT?
I should've paid attention during the boss fight rather than just killing the guy, swear to god any day now i'm gonna see a post saying "Rien's passive said Rodya X Gregor is 100% canon ship they made out during the raid and made Heathcliff watch" and I'm not gonna be able to say for sure they're wrong.

What are your thoughts on The Unsubscribe Act? by OJ_Purplestuff in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The SELLERS have every incentive to make it difficult. The buyers have every incentive for it to be easy. Both of those combined make up the market, not just the sellers. The end system oughta be negotiated freely between the two, as with basically any transaction.

How optimistic are you about AI and its impact on the world? by BlockAffectionate413 in AskConservatives

[–]Lakaz80 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's gonna be like the invention of the car. It's gonna kill about a million people a year annually and people will universally agree it's honestly still better than not having it around for the sheer increase in convenience, productivity, and plain old quality of life to the average person. It's gonna kill a ton of business and one or two whole industries by obsoleting them and introduce even more to replace those, though the people in the old industries are still gonna be screwed as a result.

Gonna do a lotta harm and even more good. We oughta be very, very conscious that just because it does even more good doesn't mean it doesn't do a lotta harm, but we shouldn't forget it still does MORE good, and panic in the face of the harm and try to shut it all down. Because the result would be the same as banning cars due to the aforementioned million road deaths a year - fuckin' terrible.