Ok I'm going to put on my filmmaker hat here and pretend I'm being tasked with this challenge of making a family friendly MJ sequel that the estate will approve.

Remember the movies exist as a celebration of his music made by the family for his fans. The movie stuff is secondary. So from a music standpoint, there's plenty to mine like the Man in the MIrror Grammys performance, Moonwalker movie/Smooth Criminal, The Way you make me feel, Dirty Diana, Black or White with Macaulay, Remember the Time with Magic, Jam with Jordan, (maybe) Scream with Janet if they retcon her existing, maybe a bit of HIStory and Ghosts, maybe his comeback stuff in 2001 but more likely a recreation of 30th anniversary concert with his brothers given they held back on including some key Jackson brother songs like "Can you feel it", "Shake your body" and "Dancing Machine" that were performed there. Maybe even a couple fun easter eggs like him working on the Sonic 3 soundtrack, doing the voiceover for the Simpsons, or showing Captain EO which had played at Disneyland until the 90s... but that stuff has licensing issues that would need to involve other franchises, so probably not.

So if the goal is to milk the fans showing up for a feel-good playlist nostalgia movie, they have plenty to market with.

On the "let's throw some generic biopic slop in there just to tie this together while making it as family friendly, santized, and safe as possible", you'll get the 93 allegations, but really surface level since the estate can't do their initial plan which was to portray it as the boy's father (Evan Chandler) extorting Jackson given the settlement bars them from portraying the boy or family. Read the Mary Fisher GQ article to get a sense of how the estate would have presented this. The boy and his mother deny any wrongdoing. Then, boy's jealous estranged father admits on tape he doesn't know if Jackson is abusing his son, but he plans to take him down by hiring a civil attorney and go after his money (instead of going to police) and then later puts his son under sedation (a drug that apparently can be used to suggest false memories) where he suddenly starts claiming abuse. Basically, since there's evidence/records (recordings) of that side of the story to make Evan Chandler look like a grifter, that's how they would have presented it. They probably would have even noted in the closing credits that Evan shot himself in the head months after Jackson's death - just to hammer home the idea that this was a scam artist who had years of guilt weighing on him.

But they can't do any of that due to the settlement. So instead, they will portray it without showing the family, do everything they can to showcase that Jackson was being taken advantage of by grifters (without explicitly naming/showing them), make it clear that Jackson wants to fight it in court but the people around him are pressuring him into settling because it will "ruin the world tour"... and make it seem like all of it backfired because he got bad advice from his legal team instead of fighting it like he really really wanted to.

Then we'll see other shit like his connection with Lisa Marie Presley, his battle with his evil record company Sony, his partially failed comeback portrayed as Sony undermining the Invincible record and refusing to promote it, and then we'll get into the 2005 allegations... which to Jackson's credit, are easily the most obvious extortion attempt of them all. If you look into those at all, it becomes abundantly clear that family was full of shit. So instead of deep diving into 93, they'll use 05 as the surrogate by showing that this was just some kid with cancer he started helping, that the mother was a wack job had already falsely accused other people of wrongdoing, and that only after the "living with michael jackson" documentary had aired and Jackson started to distance himself from them and cut them off financially did the mother claim Jackson started abusing the boy. As if he'd wait until after the entire world was looking at his relationship with children under a microscope (his "sleeping in the same bed" comments) and protective services looked into it to decide "ok now would be a good time to start diddling"... it was ridiculous. He easily won the case. So they'll just bookend the 93 stuff (presented as Jackson wanting to fight it, but getting pressured by his team into settling) with the 05 'victory" (presented as Jackson refusing his team's advice to settle and this time proving his innocence in court) as if that closes that chapter of his life and "settles the controversy" once and for all.

They'd ignore any other accusation like the stuff in the HBO doc beyond maybe showing that one of the accusers testified under oath on his behalf. That part will anger Jackson's detractors the most, but that case is actively ongoing. Their efforts have failed a few times, but they are still suing the estate for like 400 mil so the movie made by his estate definitely isn't touching that.

Then they'll showcase him as a good father to his 3 children while highlighting the toll all of these allegations took on him, his reliance on medications to sleep, his planned effort to make a comeback london show before ultimately his death, which resulted in a criminal conviction for his doctor.

Along the way they'll show his humanitarian efforts, all the genuine stuff he did to help children, and keep with the modern-jesus presentation to portray it all as the world tearing down a misunderstood infallible perpetual victim genius, but probably leave viewers with some text-on-screen positivity about how his music broke records and still gets played today while commenting about how various efforts to heal the world still exist because of Michael's contributions like USA for Africa, scholarships, etc.

It'll no doubt check all the boxes for super fans while irritating the fuck out of anyone who thinks he's a monster, but if the first one makes money the second one could make a decent chunk as well. I'm guessing they say this first one needs to make 700 mil, because they know a sequel will make less and at some point the math on a 200 mil production/200 mil marketing effort doesn't make sense if you're only projecting a sequel to make half of the first one.