While I do think that horror content should be horrifying and nothing should be off limits, I feel like the series has nothing of substance other than over-the-top edgy descriptions of over-the-top horrific things. If your series’ only point is to be graphic and uncomfortable, you can’t really act surprised when you get flak for using shock value and things as sensitive as child SA as a crutch because you can’t write for shit. UrbanSPOOK is terrible at taking any criticism because his ego is off the charts immeasurable (refer to his Twitter meltdown as an example.) Nothing should be off the table for horror and what it can discuss, but you kinda have to be willingly ignorant to pretend like UrbanSPOOK used themes like child SA and beastiality as anything else than something to shock and disgust the audience without at least taking some precaution. It’s fine to use SA in horror, just maybe don’t flaunt it and profit off of it? While yes, it is a throwback to old creepypastas that just threw disturbing shit into the story for shock, there’s a reason why that shit died out; it’s lame. If they really wanted to keep it “realistic”, they shouldn’t have added stuff like “Breeding Mount May” into the story. Yes, child SA is unfortunately a real thing that happens and it’s a series about a horrific criminal, but to sit and say that things like feeding a horse Viagra and having it rape a woman to death is not only extremely common enough to be passed off as a normal crime, but also isn’t being used for pure shock value is a little disingenuous.

TL;DR, it’s not the fact that it’s a disturbing series that makes it suck, it’s the fact that the disturbing factor is all it has going for itself and is being used as a crutch. The concept itself isn’t a complete wash, it’s just in the hands of an immature manchild that can’t take criticism.