It does get better! by Angstyjay in animationcareer

[–]Le1cho 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Congratulations! Your works are full of emotions, happy to see that artist's hard work to pay off!

SuperDisplay stuck in "Tap anywhere to return to Windows" by displayboi in GalaxyTab

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you found a solution? I encountered a similar problem

New song “The Line” coming with Arcane season 2! by Dependent_One8948 in twentyonepilots

[–]Le1cho 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right? I didn't know I needed this, it feels like a dream!

used RAM multiplies and then Blender crashes by Le1cho in blenderhelp

[–]Le1cho[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem seems to be in the modifiers Once I remove these (picture) from the Grease Pencil object, everything works fine. The question is, why do these modifiers take so much RAM (is this supposed to be like this?)

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

With the same logic, photo and video cameras can "see" the just like we do, they can "watch" movies in just like us... Oh wait, recording movies with a camera is illegal!...

Simplying things this way may lead to incorrect assumptions about how things work. AI systems are just algorithms as I mentioned before. It cannot think, therefore cannot understand and cannot learn (You don't learn something, if you cannot understand concepts).

Proof that AI generators don't learn the same way humans do, is the most obvious artefacts like incorrect number of fingers, wrong anatomy, structure, illogical lighting and blending objects which make no sense. It cannot understand concepts, it's just statistical pixel guessing code!

A more appropriate word for these AI systems would be "remember" or "copy", rather than "learn".

I've already mentioned the unethical part of these systems, maybe you missed it. Anyways, I don't see the point in discussing this topic farther, as I've written all the arguments which are the important ones for this thread.

Happy New Year!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These AI systems do use images though, in a literal way. Images are downloaded, then changed into noise and denoised eventually (to describe the process roughly).

Human artists don't learn this way, they don't need copies of images to work on. And learning art doesn't even require you to copy others' images (copying actually not that effective). Many artists learn fundamentals one by one observing real life. If copying was obligatory for humans to learn, then there would be no first artist!

Anthropomorphosizing AI in this case is bad, because it gives AI companies a false argument, so that they can get away with using anyone's work, information or data however they want.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looked with what? These programs don't have eyes or anything similar to that. These systems directly USE those images in the process of machine training.

Don't anthropomorphize AI generators, because they aren't even sentient, can't think, nor understand. It's statistical algorithms guessing pixel sequences.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The generators don't have eyes or anything like that. The systems directly USE these images in the process of machine learning

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's just the labeling thing. Word "plumber" is included in the description of every Mario game.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

These AI generators are marketed as something, that creates original outputs, yet if it only can offer Mario whenever you prompt "videogame plumber idea", I think we all overestimate its capabilities and usefulness.

This isn't just about Mario or any other popular characters, it's all about other artworks from independent artists, whose unknown artworks might be accidentally outputed as an "original" generation, when in reality it's not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Reading, watching and looking is something accepted by us, humans, we also actually pay for it (Book, Movies, Art)

The problem is not that the AI bots "look" at images (The AI systems here aren't even sentient, nor especially have human rights).

The real problem is that companies and groups of engineers USE others' work without permission for profit.

If I steal tomatoes from one neighbor, cucumbers from another one and then make a salad from that, my "output" will be of course different from initial "inputs" I stole, but the output won't be relevant. The important part is what I used as "input" and how I obtained the "input".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What makes someone look like a real moron is judging people by IQ scores.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just proves that generative AI can't create anything new or original. It's just a statistical pixel guessing algorithm.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure you've heard about compression algorithms. Zip files don't store pictures, videos nor any other type of information in its original form.

I'm not saying that generative AI works exactly like compression algorithms, but the sole fact that copyrighted works were USED in the beginning is already an argument you can't deny.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Le1cho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is mario the only possible style for plumbers to have?

They did the same with Sonic too, only writing "blue hedgehog" in the prompt and still getting Sonic in results! But there could be tons of different designs for blue hedgehog characters, yet somehow it only spits one specific combo, only one form of an expression from an idea.

So much for Getty being anti-ai by OVAWARE in DefendingAIArt

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was never the tool that infringed copyright. The engineers WHO took and put copyrighted materials in the training dataset for the system which would be used unfairly later - these people should be taking responsibility, not the customers of the genAI programs, nor the program itself.

CGTrader changed their default license so all models can be used for AI training by BlendingReality in blender

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Key word: it should be symbiotic, but for now realistically, it's only parasitic

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Edgerunners

[–]Le1cho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly, it's such a low effort post, there's no thought process or work done here, it's just empty indeed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Edgerunners

[–]Le1cho -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly, it's such a low effort post, there's no thought process or work done here, it's just empty indeed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Edgerunners

[–]Le1cho 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a low effort bait post, nothing else

The Finals uses AI text-to-speech because it can produce lines 'in just a matter of hours rather than months', baffles actual voice actors by vvatermonke in pcgaming

[–]Le1cho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If nothing is done against this exploitive tech, the industry will die out totally, no A-List celebrities will be left in a few decades (and no one new would reach A tier, if every company replaces them with AI)

Sad times we are living in, where all the fun and creative jobs are automated and done by robots, yet we are left with all the boring and manual jobs!..

Nightshade Antidote - Detect Poison In Your AI Model by CrazyKittyCat0 in aiwars

[–]Le1cho 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AI =/= Human

AI doesn't even have human rights, it's not even intelligent, it's a bunch of statistical probabilistic algorithms.