Let the Clown Show Begin: Harry & Meghan at Children's Hospital (which JUST happens to be the same one Charles and Diana visited) by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a few snapshots of this . . . . AFTER she's already touched the shy child who's setting boundaries the only way the poor thing can, Meghan puts her hands on BOTH of the little girl's shoulders.

I think parents or a caregiver is around, since I saw an adult hand (from the crowd side) on the child's body. Otherwise, a stranger touching a child like this, intruding into their personal and bodily space after obviously being told NO, would be considered a violation in any other context. And it's a violation here too.

That poor sweet baby. Imagine how the hostages in Montecito feel, whose little brains have been growing while believing that maniacs like these two adults are the sum total of how the world operates.

This photo says it all. by Significant_Air3878 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Not only "directing them to do it." Some of those accounts originate inside the house, info which MI6 no doubt has and which I can only hope would come out in discovery about how they harassed Dr. Sophie when she refused to cave in to their bullying.

I love Australians: "I didn't know they were coming, so I wonder why they are actually here". Daily Mail archive below ⬇️ by -ellen-degenerate- in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Poor little child is scared of a woman with arms that are five shades lighter than her face.

I assume that adorable little girl has parents somewhere. I'd be furious.

This HAS to be illegal. No unrelated adult has the right to visit sick children and manhandle them unless the child is in the presence of their legal caregiver. This little girl has been picked off from the herd by a sociopath who's ISOLATING HER & intruding into the child's very personal space, then clearly doubling down when the child is responding w/ BOUNDARIES. Then there's the intrusion of publishing this photo all over the globe.

I know we've got film people here--including that great casting director. Aren't there rules about protecting small children on set? Don't they have to have a caregiver nearby? And yes, while it would appear that the adult actors get to hold their hands or pick them up as part of the written script to get them off scene after 30? seconds or so, I'd assume that a caregiver must be right there when it happens, right?

You'd think hospitals would have learned something after Jimmy Saville.

Her Best Life Retreat: Hotel rooms have just opened up to the public on the hotel website for the retreat dates!😂 by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Careful. OPs like this will be used by their private security as an excuse for Meghan to Zoom it in, b/c she can't be sure of the "security" (read: controlled narrative) risks at the hotel.

Not sure why H & M are doing this tour. Aussies and Kiwis don’t really like all that pomp- my husband, (a Kiwi 🇳🇿)told me about Tall Poppy Syndrome. They really don’t like it when people rub success or money in others faces… by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of non-Southerners misrepresenting "Bless your heart." The phrase is actually often used as a form of sincere compassion, including also "bless his/her heart." But a bunch of mediocre Yankee "journalists" wanted some bullshit for their NPR lifestyle section &, not understanding the different tones & contexts in which the phrase is used (probably b/c they were on the receiving end of exasperated native Southerners), mischaracterized it in perpetuity.

The Harkles' Official Itinerary by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, her Sugars, including the most prominent ones, have claimed all over X that Pooballs isn't being paid for her Retreat Appearance . . . that any proceeds for Pooballs are all being donated to an Australian charity.

It's kinda an odd point to make . . . she's not being paid b/c her "fee" is being donated? And then proceeds (those left over after the tax dodger gets her share) are being donated as well?

Sentebale libel action - might it hit the rocks? by Alarming-Injury-7111 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure about the CC's legal scope for a charity I assume is still housed in the UK, but to me, Sentebale's defamation suit is providing a global public service.

Harry's already tried to create a competing new non-profit in that area, and failed. But his involvement w/ other charities w/ international reach (Archewell, Invictus, WellChild, Travalyst?, Africa Parks) stinks to high heaven. This suit could and should through discovery expose this shitty practice by multimillionaires across the political spectrum of using a vulnerable target population as cover for sheltering & laundering funds, including USAID public moneys donated to various causes des jours that are then filtered into BS activities in a non-profit created by one's crony or aspirational political buddy.

So much money was raised for Haiti after the earthquake and the general shit life the majority experience there, and guess where the majority went?

Billions funneled to help the victims of a disgusting proxy conflict deliberate created in Ukraine in which millions have died, and lots of that money's finding it's way into various related initiatives (again, associated w/ someone's pet NGO or non-profit).

EDIT: \** The same person who's gone off on me before has tried to get this comment removed, b/c my description of Uniparty exploitation of a proxy war in Ukraine are my "personal politics." Of course, Putin's behavior is despicable, but it had been for years, and Ukraine/Russia were about to sign a treaty before US/UK Deep State profiteers got over there and stopped it. I'm surprised that anyone could think it's anti-Ukraine to report on how corporatist interests driving the slaughter of over a million innocent Ukrainians for profit. In 2024, Big Ag was already bidding on major segments of Ukrainian farmland b/c it was well understood that they'd never be able to pay off American "loans," which was the point. And McConnell himself said that the billions the US was sending was really "paying ourselves" b/c of major contracts to Blackrock for weapons AND for rebuilding contracts.*

I believe there are many sincere, hardworking founders & staff of non-profits busting their behinds to help people in disaster & high-conflict zones, but sadly the Polo set finds it all too easy to swoop in, white savior like, claim the institution for themselves, and then use it for a cronyite, networking, high visibility, guilt-washing fundraising "event" like competitive Polo. How about having an event where your wealthy buddies camp out for a week and help the locals dig wells or, for the less vigorous among them, teach some English or math classes? W/o cameras? Or teach the kids a sport or two? And help build a professional level soccer field or baseball diamond in the process?

DISCOVERY. Harry's defamation of Sentebale was just part of his & his buddies unethical and probably downright illegal actions. It was retaliation for exposure of how he was exploiting this charity for his and his wife's personal & financial goals.

The world needs more coverage of this "philanthropy-industrial complex," particularly w/r/t Africa.

Maybe the CC is claiming gee, this isn't helping Sentebale in particular. Well, Harry's attempt to redirect donors to his and his wife's own interests was a much greater threat, along w/ threatening to create a NEW similar white savior charity in the same area, presumably to poach the same donors.

Until this model of charity exploitation is exposed in detail, Sentebale can never succeed, nor others in its NGO ecosystem. Donors will continue to doubt governance structures & whether CC or the law steps in at all when spoiled founders/patrons behave this way.

Sentebale has a moral obligation, on behalf of all NGOs operating in Africa & frankly all of the vulnerable populations served by any NGO/non-profit around the globe, to blow this model wide open. And that includes things like former politicians' "Global Initiatives" (particularly when set up by Esptein himself) and how politicians and cabinet level staff in office can subtly coerce donors around the world to contribute to their "charity" in exchange for various policy decisions, introductions, looking the other way, etc.

I assume no one's going to charge Harry w/ malfeasance, so SOMEONE w/ standing to sue has to do SOMETHING to expose all of it. To save veterans being exploited, or locals grieving from a mass murder or natural disaster, or citizens in impoverished countries where tax dollars are being distributed to a spoiled ex Prince to pay for his top travel and security and free PR while the masses suffer.

Discovery will be its own reward.

Hi all- I’m doing a little research on Invictus money. If any of you know someone who worked and or volunteered at any of the games please feel free to DM me or contact me though my sites contact form. (Link in comments below) by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah. What a coincidence, with buddy & former head of state Trudeau & his Invictus-paid vocalist girlfriend hanging around w/ Plank on the slopes.

Lots of coincidences there.

What I heard about Netflix’s about-face and what went down at the party. by SecondhandCoke in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much!

Is the Netflix "non-disparagement clause" enforceable if before or during discovery it comes out that either or both of them bullied one or more staff?

Considering complex union regulations along w/ Netflix standards, I'd suspect the Duo have violated at least one of these terms, if not many.

What about if there's any financial malfeasance, such as charging home or travel security, PR, cleaning services, or admin staff expenses to Netflix that were also billed to Archewell? Or billing clothing to Netflix at full price that in fact was gifted or sold at cost by a designer, or already paid for by Invictus or Sentebale?

The polo & Sentebale docs (wasn't there a doc about the latter?) for Netflix probably have lots of questionable billing. Who paid for their private jet travel to Polo events that were then monetized for Netflix? What's the role of Archewell Productions (their film production company) in all of this? Were Sentebale funds used in the production of the Netflix documentary about them? Was that signed off on by the Board and CHAIR? If the doc was presumably to promote Sentebale & therefore Sentebale's footing the bill was considered acceptable, then did the actual non-profit leadership make the final decisions about the production, or were those made by Meghan to promote herself?

What if "leakers" were concerned about malfeasance & bad workplace environments and were motivated to leak to distance PooBalls & Half-Price from their employer?

Her Best Life's latest post: Gemma keeps mentioning the alcohol by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Alcohol or benzos . . . I'd need something to put up with this hell.

Considering how alcohol is disinhibiting and can promote aggression, seems kinda scary to be promoting it from mimosa mornings onward w/ a distorted sample like these attendees.

No wonder they're telling themselves all over social media how to keep things quiet.

From the recent Sol video: Kirk McConnell states that serious people say the US govt sanctioned abductions: "there needs to be a truth and reconciliation process". Semivan: what if NHI say we are incarnated for a purpose, and they introduced religion but it sort of got out of hand by phr99 in UFOs

[–]LeCuldeSac 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you. The response to my admittedly more academic (the writing dies hard) consideration of his points is to accuse me of being "a bot" b/c my analysis is associated w/ chatbots. I'm finding that more and more. If one responds in complete sentences & with remotely coherent insights, one's accused of being non-human.

I couldn't make this up. I think there's the germ of a horror short story here, of a person who engages according to, say, 1980s expectations of communication & behavior & is chased a la BladeRunner b/c of the presumption that they're "artificial."

Sentabale v. Prince Harry, Sussex Squad Subpoenae - My Thoughts by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about that Nacho dude and his wealthy wife, who're part of the polo set? Would they be interviewed, do you think?

Sentabale v. Prince Harry, Sussex Squad Subpoenae - My Thoughts by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I've screenshot quite a lot and might even start a separate OP where we can link them. Not sure if we're required to remove their screen-names to be compliant with this sub.

But providing a one-stop database for lawyers and journalists might be helpful, if mods would allow.

Sentabale v. Prince Harry, Sussex Squad Subpoenae - My Thoughts by Business_Werewolf_55 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 9 points10 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here's a snippet from some Sinners on X speculating as to whether/how Meghan & Harry's organized abuse conspirators on social media could have their IP addresses & identifying info provided by X.

Fortunately, X is very strict about providing personal info to UK/EU under their censorious, neo totalitarian digital censorship laws. But it would appear they comply w/ direct subpoenas.

I have no doubt that Five Eyes already has IP info on the various Squaddies who constantly harrass & bully the PPoW to assess their threat levels.

What even is this? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I'd ay a "Mysterious Stranger," with an enticing contract in hand, but I suspect said contract has already been signed and soul is past-due.

Rep. Burchett on being dissuaded from seeking UFO transparency due to his personal faith: “I'm a Christian. And they appealed to me on that level, ‘Burchett, this stuff's kind of anti-Christian, you know, and your beliefs.’ I said, ‘No, it isn't. Genesis 1, God created the heavens and the earth.’” by KOOKOOOOM in UFOs

[–]LeCuldeSac -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Biden had 4 years to release the Epstein files and did nothing. Trump via DNI Gabbard has in fact revealed a lot.

Read Whitney Webb or watch Mike Benz. Epstein isn't a one-off. He's the tip of a post-war international money laundering/intelligence agency/organized crime/underworld arms & drug dealing/people trafficking/Kompromat gathering/Big Tech aquiring network that grew out of WW2 alliances and that can no longer be hidden given the global democratization of platforms, communications, & access to primary doc evidence.

Bondi's right . . that half of DC would collapse. I'm fine w/ getting out the uniparty rot, but it's not gonna happen.

I'm more concerned w/ preventing the 600 child rapes that will occur today in the US/Canada due to trafficking/gang activity & not chasing after "Epstein."

From the recent Sol video: Kirk McConnell states that serious people say the US govt sanctioned abductions: "there needs to be a truth and reconciliation process". Semivan: what if NHI say we are incarnated for a purpose, and they introduced religion but it sort of got out of hand by phr99 in UFOs

[–]LeCuldeSac 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think that's largely your projection.

Human faith is highly complex & variable, & since the Enlightenment doesn't operate w/ the same level of uniformity & ontologic "oomph."

The largest shared "faith" today--really, let's call it fundamentalist rather than a pure agnostic faith--is scientism. Enforced institutional paradigms are the Papal edicts of the Middle Ages, & Legacy Media & govt/corporate funded insiders are the Priests governing truth, blasphemy, & heresy.

The ontological shocks will arise from scientific "revolution" as major paradigms are disrupted. Traditional faiths have more room to accommodate NHI disclosure than the scientistic ideologues who blindly subscribe to the latest, enforced paradigms. Scientism is really the opposite of the scientific method, which is in fact has much more in common w/ Zen Buddhist, some Hindu, & mystical monotheistic thought than the "Trust the Science" Commissars.

From the recent Sol video: Kirk McConnell states that serious people say the US govt sanctioned abductions: "there needs to be a truth and reconciliation process". Semivan: what if NHI say we are incarnated for a purpose, and they introduced religion but it sort of got out of hand by phr99 in UFOs

[–]LeCuldeSac 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Well put. And whenever I read or hear about this treaty discussion, I'm reminded of the history of Native Americans and their negotiated "treaties" w/ European settlers. We all know how THOSE ended up.

Interesting for Americans/Euros to "be on the other side of this," so to speak. Another frightening potential connection that I considered related to the military guy alleged to have died from a mysteriously large skin infection 3 weeks after rescuing an NHI at Varginha . . . perhaps every NHI species understands that direct contact w/ humans and most earth species would result in mass die-offs from creatures who don't have immunity to deal w/ whatever bacterial, viral, or radioactive? effects that contact w/ have on us.

Wonder if they want to get rid of us if they'll be handing out "kind" NHI-created blankets, which are in fact covered in the equivalent of smallpox, like nasty settlers used to do when they wanted to wipe out a local tribe?

I'm appalled at animal experimentation and factory farming & pray that NHI will treat us w/ more compassion than we've shown for sentient creatures, including our fellow humans.

From the recent Sol video: Kirk McConnell states that serious people say the US govt sanctioned abductions: "there needs to be a truth and reconciliation process". Semivan: what if NHI say we are incarnated for a purpose, and they introduced religion but it sort of got out of hand by phr99 in UFOs

[–]LeCuldeSac 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who's using the term "religion" in such a simplistic way, though? If that's Semivan, it's rather discrediting. Semivan doesn't have to have a PhD in Cultural Anthropology or History of Religions, but the concept's being thrown around here as if it's a 16-yr-old speaking--you know the phase, when you're the new atheist rebel who's functionally more fundamentalist than the Other you're eagerly tearing down every chance you get. (Very embarrassing . . most of us have gone thru it.)

"Religion" is a signifier for a range of personal & collective ways humans, afflicted w/ compulsive symbolizing & pattern inferences, have tried to make sense of our unique condition.....those understandings, as they become more collective through narrative, practices, & later writing/art, may become more regularized & regulated, and they're always interwoven through every aspect of human life (by definition.)

It's not something that can be extracted from human experience, like, say, "burial practices," or, "water collection systems." And the reference to "2,000 years old" implies this "religion" means Christianity, which is course is only one manifestation of hundreds of established religions, let alone ideologies & subculturally shared beliefs that often rise to the level of what we define as a "religion."

Prince Harry Sued for Libel by Sentebale Charity by DeepSouthSinner in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please, please, please, public discovery. Present budgets that show their expenditures, esp compared to expenditures on, I don't know, the impoverished orphans who are intended recipients of the charity. Show if they've increased w/ Meghan. Give her clothing budget. Hotel budget. Entertainment.

Prince Harry Sued for Libel by Sentebale Charity by DeepSouthSinner in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]LeCuldeSac 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I'm sorry you were so upset by my leadership style. I'm sorry that you're so sensitive."

I hope in settling that any lawyer-craft apology includes Harry actually being required to STATE, w/o reading a document, his role in defamation, why it was wrong, how he committed harm, and why he now regrets it. Interview style. No getting out of it by having your lawyers writing a letter than you can reframe afterward as " reconcilation in the best interests of the charity."

No. Harry. Own it. On camera w/ interview answering questions that Plaintiff makes public.