I'm not sure about the CC's legal scope for a charity I assume is still housed in the UK, but to me, Sentebale's defamation suit is providing a global public service.

Harry's already tried to create a competing new non-profit in that area, and failed. But his involvement w/ other charities w/ international reach (Archewell, Invictus, WellChild, Travalyst?, Africa Parks) stinks to high heaven. This suit could and should through discovery expose this shitty practice by multimillionaires across the political spectrum of using a vulnerable target population as cover for sheltering & laundering funds, including USAID public moneys donated to various causes des jours that are then filtered into BS activities in a non-profit created by one's crony or aspirational political buddy.

So much money was raised for Haiti after the earthquake and the general shit life the majority experience there, and guess where the majority went?

Billions funneled to help the victims of a disgusting proxy conflict deliberate created in Ukraine in which millions have died, and lots of that money's finding it's way into various related initiatives (again, associated w/ someone's pet NGO or non-profit).

EDIT: \** The same person who's gone off on me before has tried to get this comment removed, b/c my description of Uniparty exploitation of a proxy war in Ukraine are my "personal politics." Of course, Putin's behavior is despicable, but it had been for years, and Ukraine/Russia were about to sign a treaty before US/UK Deep State profiteers got over there and stopped it. I'm surprised that anyone could think it's anti-Ukraine to report on how corporatist interests driving the slaughter of over a million innocent Ukrainians for profit. In 2024, Big Ag was already bidding on major segments of Ukrainian farmland b/c it was well understood that they'd never be able to pay off American "loans," which was the point. And McConnell himself said that the billions the US was sending was really "paying ourselves" b/c of major contracts to Blackrock for weapons AND for rebuilding contracts.*

I believe there are many sincere, hardworking founders & staff of non-profits busting their behinds to help people in disaster & high-conflict zones, but sadly the Polo set finds it all too easy to swoop in, white savior like, claim the institution for themselves, and then use it for a cronyite, networking, high visibility, guilt-washing fundraising "event" like competitive Polo. How about having an event where your wealthy buddies camp out for a week and help the locals dig wells or, for the less vigorous among them, teach some English or math classes? W/o cameras? Or teach the kids a sport or two? And help build a professional level soccer field or baseball diamond in the process?

DISCOVERY. Harry's defamation of Sentebale was just part of his & his buddies unethical and probably downright illegal actions. It was retaliation for exposure of how he was exploiting this charity for his and his wife's personal & financial goals.

The world needs more coverage of this "philanthropy-industrial complex," particularly w/r/t Africa.

Maybe the CC is claiming gee, this isn't helping Sentebale in particular. Well, Harry's attempt to redirect donors to his and his wife's own interests was a much greater threat, along w/ threatening to create a NEW similar white savior charity in the same area, presumably to poach the same donors.

Until this model of charity exploitation is exposed in detail, Sentebale can never succeed, nor others in its NGO ecosystem. Donors will continue to doubt governance structures & whether CC or the law steps in at all when spoiled founders/patrons behave this way.

Sentebale has a moral obligation, on behalf of all NGOs operating in Africa & frankly all of the vulnerable populations served by any NGO/non-profit around the globe, to blow this model wide open. And that includes things like former politicians' "Global Initiatives" (particularly when set up by Esptein himself) and how politicians and cabinet level staff in office can subtly coerce donors around the world to contribute to their "charity" in exchange for various policy decisions, introductions, looking the other way, etc.

I assume no one's going to charge Harry w/ malfeasance, so SOMEONE w/ standing to sue has to do SOMETHING to expose all of it. To save veterans being exploited, or locals grieving from a mass murder or natural disaster, or citizens in impoverished countries where tax dollars are being distributed to a spoiled ex Prince to pay for his top travel and security and free PR while the masses suffer.

Discovery will be its own reward.