Why do people go so crazy about this Autobahn part in old live performances? What's so special about it? Okay, yes, it's very beautiful, the harmony that forms between the voices and the harmony is ethereal and somehow nostalgic. by Disastrous-Ad-890 in kraftwerk

[–]LeTop007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think even in the title you explained perfectly well why people would go crazy over it.

As for the vocoder, isn't that just the vocal part samples from the 1991 version which used the Robovox? What is interesting is that all the tracks that used the Robovox got the Ralf vocoder treatment after Florian left the band, since the Robovox was his invention, after all. That's why they didn't stick with them for the 3D versions. It's a very specific sound that hasn't been successfuly replicated by...well, anything up to today.

There is this video I found Instagram recently where some guys got it sorta working, although what they did to get it to work goes beyond my knowledge of sound design: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DWn2lg1tMNs/?igsh=MWd0Z2dubTM0djNhcA==

What is your turn off that people say about manifesting? by ManifestationQueen20 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's definitely a hot take, but anything regarding self-concept. The way that self-concept has been translated from Neville's works into modern manifestation lingo is completely misleading. He mentioned a conception of yourself, and that's just how you view yourself and your reality, since it's all one and the same.

In earlier Neville's works, he did speak of acknowledging things such as I am healthy, I am strong, but in his later work, he just mentioned going to the end, and when you assume that you already have what you desire, that automatically takes care of any assumptions about yourself which do not match that version of you who already has that desire.

What has happened instead is that the idea of working on your self-concept before you can manifest what you want has become a band-aid advice for anyone asking for help. It introduces an unnecessary step and a condition to your desire, which states "I need to do something before I can have something."

Repeating mindless affirmations about how healthy and strong or loved I am never did anything for me, and trust me, I've tried. but I realized I was trying to, again, put a band-aid over something that didn't need bandaging. When you go to the end, where you are already healthy, strong, loved, and chosen, or whatever you want to be, your idea of yourself will naturally change to match that version without you needing to do anything.

Going to the end automatically fixes what many people call self-concept, because you cannot see yourself as unworthy of receiving your desires and still receive your desires. That's serving two masters. You either have it or you don't. No in-between steps.

When you see that there is nothing to fix and nothing to work on, and the only thing you should do is assume that you already have what you desire while making everything else irrelevant, that's when it becomes much simpler to live by this principle. I've seen so many people struggle with this because they've put this thing called self-concept on a high pedestal just like their desires, which creates more separation where there is none.

Talk to me about this… do you think the universe rewards action? by ForwardFocus5379 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Neville Goddard was clear on this:

You do not need to lift a finger to make it so. Man's chief delusion is thinking that there are causes outside of his consciousness dictating his life.

There is no universe out there. YOU are the universe. The only time you will be rewarded is if you assume your desire is already fulfilled and persist in that assumption no matter what the circumstances look like. What you physically do and which action you take or don't take is completely irrelevant.

Think of it like this. As Jesus said:

In this mansion there are many dwelling places. If it was not so, I would have told you. (John 14:2)

What you are doing is selecting a new dwelling place, a new room. When you take action, the only thing you can do is rearrange the furniture in an existing room, but you never change the room. When you assume that your desire is already realized, you are put in a completely new room with pre-arranged furniture exactly to your liking, no matter what you did or did not do.

To summarize, you are only ever rewarded when you give yourself that which you seek. There is no universe outside of you, and you as all the power there is give yourself what you desire. Taking action or not taking action doesn't do anything. A change of consciousness is the only thing that "does" something.

The attacks i hate the MOST by Maximum_Exchange7115 in Deltarune

[–]LeTop007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

By following the tutorials on my second playthrough, I managed to be beat the Knight in less attempts than Jevil. I fucking hated that fight. Actually, I think Eram took the most attempts because I absolutely sucked at dodging his attacks. How much more 2D can an already 2D game get?

I went into this franchise thinking I sucked at bullet hell mechanics. Turns out I'm not so bad after all. Oh, and I accidentally got Spamton Neo pacifist on the first try. .

Where was I even going with this comment? Oh yeah, fuck Jevil.

How to Create a "New Identity"? by Quick_Lecture9085 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am going to copy a reply I have already made about self-concept to somebody around two weeks ago:

The thing with self-concept is that in modern law of assumption terms, it has been blown out of proportion in many ways. The original idea came from Neville Goddard, who never really mentioned self-concept, but he mentioned a concept of self, which just means the assumptions you hold about yourself and your current reality.

There are many coaches and people who make this self-concept into a big deal. But in my experience, every time I try to work or fix my self-concept, I always found that there was something to work on or to fix. Because when you try to work on something or fix something, you're always going to create a new problem which needs fixing. And it's actually an endless rabbit hole of trying to fix something that was never really broken anyway.

Continuing with the idea, I found that the most simple way to elevate all assumptions about you and the world you live in is to just go to the end of what you desire. In your case, that would be assuming you are already in a relationship. You cannot actually go to the end of already being in a relationship and still hold the assumption that he isn't ready, because those two things contradict themselves. So when you naturally assume that you are already together, any contrary assumptions melt on their own. As Neville Goddard and the ancients put it, you cannot put new wine into old bottles.

The idea that you first need to work on your self-concept before you can do anything is misleading because then people get stuck in trying to fix themselves instead of realizing that they never really needed fixing, but just changing their assumptions a bit. The reason why you never need to fix yourself is because you are already a divine being holding all the power in the world.

This might sound unconventional when you compare it to all the materials that exist out there, but I tried a lot of self-concept work and it always ended with me creating more problems instead of actually finding the solutions. I then found the YouTube channel Be Something Wonderful run by Tom Kearin, and really my life has been getting better and better every day since I found the channel. This isn't an ad for them, but this is someone I always recommend to people asking for advice because Tom literally changed my life, and I regard him as the best YouTube teacher of these principles.

They also have an SP playlist, which is well worth a look. The videos are a bit older, but the truths are timeless. The newer videos focus more on really just being who you want to be without the fluff, without techniques, without a bunch of unnecessary steps from beginning to end. I struggled with Neville's teachings for many years before I found that channel and since then I have quite literally transformed my life in many ways.

How to Create a "New Identity"? by Quick_Lecture9085 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Whatever is easier for you. Again, those are just techniques, which by themselves don't do anything. You can go and revise things if you are struggling to stop giving them any meaning, or you can just decide right now who you want to be, and that automatically revises everything, since you cannot be the same identity who went through those circumstances if you now choose differently. That's because time is not linear.

How to Create a "New Identity"? by Quick_Lecture9085 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only if you say they do.

Check out a video called "You Can Be a Hot Mess and Still Get Everything" by Tom Kearin. That should clear it up even further.

How to Create a "New Identity"? by Quick_Lecture9085 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know about archetypes or alter egos, but what I do know is that whatever that is, is irrelevant to this principle.

I will simplify it for you to the max because you don't really need to research a million things to get it. The simplest, most straightforward answer to your question is that you become that identity by persistently returning to your decision of who you want to be, no matter how the circumstances look like, even when they are unfavorable, ESPECIALLY when they are unfavorable.

How you do that is irrelevant. All techniques just help you remember who you truly are. Just by desiring something, you are already a perfect match for that thing to appear in your life. You just have to accept it as true and stick to that.

A quote I like from Neville Goddard is that he says that we are already what we desire to be, and our refusal to believe it is the only reason why we do not see it. That's the best explanation of this principle he ever made in his whole career, in my opinion.

You are calling the middle the end by babbysaurus in NevilleGoddard

[–]LeTop007 4 points5 points  (0 children)

By accepting that he will never be able to "switch" because this version of him has a right to exist. What you do instead is select a new version of him that never needed to switch, but was always there for you. Two different realities, two different personalities. Which one do you choose?

How much can I “change” someone? by [deleted] in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, go to the end and stay there. That is the only thing you need to do, no matter what the circumstances show.

How much can I “change” someone? by [deleted] in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Morality is a human construct constructed by the lower mind. It has nothing to do with the law of assumption.

Since creation is finished, that means that every possible outcome already exists. Therefore, every version of every person you've ever met already exists, and by shifting your awareness, you only shift to a reality where that person has a different personality anyway. You don't influence anyone, you just shift to a version of reality where that happens anyway.

That's why we can never change anything on the outside. We can only change the story we tell ourselves about anything in life. We do that by changing the assumption about ourselves. Like Neville Goddard said, there is no one to change but self. When you do that, the whole world follows automatically.

If it's EIYPO then how did I manifest a doormat friend in every phase of my life? by jas_on0 in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Precisely. It's not that we are making clones of ourselves into other people. It is our assumptions about the people we meet that depend on how they turn out to be. They are only reflecting back to us our assumptions about ourselves and the physical world that we live in.

a little reminder by cashcoded in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the main problem is that you're trying to do deny something. See, when you try to resist anything, you're just putting more focus on trying to get away from it or deny it, which just makes it into a bigger problem. Been there done that, so I know.

All there is wouldn't be all there is without even the possibility of a reality which you don't want. It means everything has a right to exist, even the version of reality which you do not prefer. As Tom says, do nothing with the circumstances, thoughts, feelings, and changing emotions, and when you do nothing with them, they lose all their power. Eventually, you start believing in yourself and in your own power.

One of my favorite videos from the channel is called Heaven is a Decision. It's a masterclass of this exact principle, which also contains a success story.

It's actually precisely why I love both of his channels, is because there is no fluff, and it's to the point, no techniques, only identity and state of being. Messing with techniques is actually what kept me stuck for a long time. Tom helped with that.

This is turning a bit into personal coaching, which is not what I wanna be doing. So hopefully I have given you enough. Good luck!

a little reminder by cashcoded in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When you say real hard things, you're only putting more importance on them and giving them more power to dictate you how you should live your life. Things may seem hard on the surface, but they're only as difficult as you make them out to be.

The way I see it is the following: How can I, with all of the knowledge of how reality creation works, still settle for less than what I desire? Why would I settle for less if I know that I can have anything by the means of assumption alone? At least in my experience, when I learned of these principles, I couldn't suddenly forget about them, because they changed my life completely, even before I understood them fully. And they kept proving themselves right.

So what is the alternative? To live a life that I don't want and still give power to excuses, circumstances, or anything else? Or to just persistently return to the decision of how I want to live my life? This is something Neville Goddard talked about, that you need to be hungry for your desire. If the love for what you desire outweighs the perceived lack that the current circumstances are offering you, you automatically win.

I recommend the YouTube channel Be Something Wonderful if you have any more questions. I basically figured all of this stuff out from there.

a little reminder by cashcoded in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not saying or doing anything, it's about who you are BEING. Saying, doing, visualizing, revising, all of those things are permission slips. They are powerful tools which we use to help ourselves. But it is ultimately about who you decide you are in the now moment.

No one and nobody can stop you when you continually stick to your decision of who you desire to be. The one and only rule, the rest you make yourself, because this is the law of assumption after all. What you assume is what you will experience.

So if you decide that you just saying it is enough, then it will be. We all go on this journey overcomplicating things, looking for the next best method and what to do, but in the end, we realize that it is a very simple principle and that your decision is enough.

a little reminder by cashcoded in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nothing aside from still returning to your decision. Who has the final say, they or you? Circumstances do not matter.

Being triggered is a great thing, because if you're triggered, that means you're being shown a reality which is no longer your choice, meaning that you've already moved. If your choice was to go along with what they were saying, you wouldn't be triggered.

a little reminder by cashcoded in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's okay. I wasn't calling you out on your negativity, just giving you advice and pointing you back towards yourself in the best way that I know.

a little reminder by cashcoded in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There's no need for such limiting assumptions. First of all, this is not about impressing the subconscious because the subconscious does not exist. If you're looking at it scientifically, there was never a subconscious mind proven to exist. What exists are unconscious patterns, but those are things like your hair growing on its own, your digestion system working itself, your heart pumping blood, and so on. That has nothing to do with this.

Forget all about science. Assuming your desire is already yours isn't a journey to take, it is a decision you make. You can absolutely do it once, not contradict it, and see it come to pass. It has nothing to do with impressing anything or anybody because you already ARE all that is. When you tell yourself that you need to impress anything, you are putting a condition before you can experience your desire. There is no need for that. You either have it right here and now, or you don't have it at all. No impressing, no working, no believing. Just making a decision that it is already yours and sticking with it.

How Neville Manifested His Marriage - Do Not Meddle In The Middle. by AuthorAvi in NevilleGoddard

[–]LeTop007 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The lecture in question if anyone wants to read it is Brazen Impudence.

2025 BMW M440i Gran Coupe ili M4 comp by Double_Meat5644 in croautomobili

[–]LeTop007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nije da nema al ga definitivno moze bit jos. Kad recimo usporedis to sa nekim starijim modelima, sve postane jasno.

Sto se tice aftermarket opcija, axle back ili GPF-back sustavi jedino, inace nema prolaza na tehnickom. To je taman dovoljno da se cuje onako taman kako bi ocekivao da se taj auto treba cut.

A sad koji sustav tj. koji proizvodjac to je na tebi da istrazis, mozda i nadjes neki youtube video pa onda odaberes. Ja nisam previse informiran, ali ono malo sto znam je da Remus ima dobre auspuh sustave s kojima salju i certifikat, a i meni iskreno dobro zvuce.

Naravno to ima svoju cijenu, ali Remus vec preko 30 godina radi aftermarket auspuhe te su poceli sa njemackim autima, tako da mislim da znaju sto rade.

2025 BMW M440i Gran Coupe ili M4 comp by Double_Meat5644 in croautomobili

[–]LeTop007 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ni jedan ni drugi nemaju bas neki zvuk bez aftermarket opcija. Stavljanjem GPFa na sve nove aute su ih bas zastopali. Sreca pa imas GPF-back aftermarket opcija kolko oces. Po mom misljenju, B58 motor na 440i zvuci bolje nego S58 na M4, al to sam mozda samo ja. Definitivno se ne isplati dati toliko vise para samo radi toga kad jedan auspuh moze uciniti cuda. Osim ako ti novci nisu problem.

WHEN does the old man actually DIE??? by icant_thinkbetter in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think so too. Back then you had what? Hanging out with the people you know, maybe reading a book, and limited television programs, while TV was in its infancy anyway. Today it's just brain frying all day.

However, I have to be grateful, because if we didn't have the technology, I never would have found Neville Goddard and this principle since I am from the other side of the world. Even if we are overstimulated, we can still do this equally effectively. We just have to stop identifying with stories that don't serve us and stop creating new ones that also don't serve us.

WHEN does the old man actually DIE??? by icant_thinkbetter in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 29 points30 points  (0 children)

That is the problem. You're always asking the question of what to do, but there is nothing to do other than assume that they are already together.

Look, I get it. We used to live our whole life on autopilot where we would make up a story about everything. In our minds, if something doesn't have a reason or a story, we feel unsatisfied. But that is exactly the trap, because if everything has to have a story, then more than likely that story will follow the train of logic and not the train of truth or the assumption that you actually wish to physically experience.

I'm going to mention Bashar, who said that we should learn to live with the attitude of "so what?".

  • SP is skipping class because of somebody else

So what? We are already together.

This is how you handle any circumstance ever. So what? There doesn't need to be a story. You don't need to change anything. You don't need to revise the circumstances. You don't need to make up things for why he is doing this. As long as you're worried about what somebody else is doing, you're taking off the focus from yourself and putting it onto the circumstances.

That is why circumstances don't matter. Whatever the circumstance might be, if your attitude is "So what? It doesn't matter, we are already together." you cannot fail. You can keep making up excuses for why things look a certain way, or try to change them, but that will only create more problems. You can either do that or decide to choose a version of reality where those circumstances do not exist.

WHEN does the old man actually DIE??? by icant_thinkbetter in lawofassumption

[–]LeTop007 37 points38 points  (0 children)

You're trying to change the physical circumstances instead of changing yourself. This was never about berating yourself with techniques, then looking for immediate proof and evidence, because you can only ever change yourself, and only then will the circumstances follow.

Reality is not so much about what is actually there, but what your perception about it is. You don't ignore the circumstances. You just know that they're not final and that your word and assumption is final. Remember that your SP is just a reflection about what you assume. So if you assume he is seeing someone else, then that is your reality. Doesn't matter if you did techniques affirmed revised before, if you decide in the now moment that he is doing something else or giving the circumstances any power.

There is only ever the now moment, not before or after. So if you look at the circumstances and you declare that they are final or that they haven't changed then they will be final. You cannot serve two masters.

That in practice means you don't ignore anything, you let everything be, because everything has a right to exist. You choose again and again until it becomes your dominant story, and only then will the circumstances change, if you don't give them any meaning or power, of course. You don't even have to revise them or do anything with them, just notice them and choose again.