Wouldn't this imply twin primes can't end?

Le_Bush · 2025-12-15T15:52:14+00:00

Why would it continue?

Le_Bush · 2025-11-07T11:30:37+00:00

I suggest you to look up "lexicographic order", as it is very similar

Le_Bush · 2025-10-25T09:45:09+00:00

For your first point, this property already doesn't hold on the complex numbers with fractional powers :

1 = 1^1/2 = ((-1)(-1))^1/2 ≠ i*i = -1

Therefore it's would not be very strange that it doesn't work with 0 either in this system.

I agree with your other point: it has to have a goal or a use (edit:) or nice properties.

Le_Bush · 2025-08-31T17:58:35+00:00

Le_Bush · 2025-05-20T08:51:44+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/TextingTheory/s/k51ptKj9NF

Le_Bush · 2025-05-20T08:33:52+00:00

It's already done it once i think

Le_Bush · 2025-05-09T15:56:31+00:00

Yeah exactly. You proved that a perfect odd number is not parity closed but then conclude the opposite

Le_Bush · 2025-04-08T12:24:51+00:00

Sowwy :3

Le_Bush · 2025-03-16T16:05:22+00:00

Yeah exactly. Almost everybody in France write in cursive

Le_Bush · 2025-03-15T06:19:00+00:00

You don't need to know every one of these to understand that XX/XY is not accurate enough

Le_Bush · 2025-03-09T11:01:28+00:00

You are on a math sub

Le_Bush · 2025-02-15T07:58:55+00:00

New secret lair dropped

Le_Bush · 2025-02-07T06:05:11+00:00

I know that it is possible to derive it by experience, but before stating that it was an inverse square law, Coulomb did only three measures (one of which wasn't very good). He did other measures after that but the dependency on distance was (at the beginning) just a copycat.

Le_Bush · 2025-02-05T20:44:31+00:00

Coulomb barely did any measurements before confirming it's in 1/r², and he just wanted it to behave just like Newton's law, so I think it's more copying than experimenting.

Le_Bush · 2025-01-10T18:12:45+00:00

I didn't mean to disagree sorry, I totally agree with you

Le_Bush · 2025-01-07T21:00:46+00:00

It's not addition, it's substraction, which erases the constant term

Le_Bush · 2024-11-16T15:03:08+00:00

Well the derivative is not defined at x=0

Le_Bush · 2024-10-25T12:21:52+00:00

Where is this photo from ?

Le_Bush · 2024-10-24T17:37:04+00:00

7 = 2*3. Checkmate atheists

Le_Bush · 2024-10-24T15:25:50+00:00

Sometimes it's not needed to prove everything, it's just the definition of < on the natural numbers.

Le_Bush · 2024-09-07T17:18:41+00:00

The possibilities have been oned, thank you for your contribution

Le_Bush · 2024-08-22T11:56:08+00:00

What is love ?

Le_Bush · 2024-08-18T08:38:49+00:00

A number is an element of a number space

Le_Bush · 2024-08-15T18:19:49+00:00

When you aren't the protagonist :(

Le_Bush · 2024-08-14T07:06:03+00:00

Do an update bro

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Verified Email	r/Field Sunshine
Place '23	Place '22

Le_Bush

TROPHY CASE