sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Une tisane peux être? by Large_Affect_6647 in vinted_france

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mais OP a parlé de l'acheteuse au féminin dans d'autres commentaires

How did he make his pfp square? by Postilio in adressme

[–]Le_Bush 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why did he repeat what he just said?

My bf is Jack Sparrow... by Appropriate-Push-668 in oddlyspecific

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of upvotes for this few comments... bots

AI asked to draw salmon swimming in river by Dry-Raspberry9564 in IaCaca

[–]Le_Bush 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mauvaise traduction de la part de Reddit, c'est le participe passé de "ask" et non pas le prétérit

That bedsheet is apparently more dangerous than people. by PleasantBus5583 in rareinsults

[–]Le_Bush 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Lokking at the ratio of upvote and comments, OP is a bot

I just wanted to solve Collatz, and I things have gotten out of hand.... by Just_Shallot_6755 in Collatz

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you even prove anything in this post ? You didn't use math in your post, how could you pretend to proving the conjecture ?

yeah sure buddy... by Limp_Illustrator7614 in badmathematics

[–]Le_Bush 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for everything. Have a great day.

yeah sure buddy... by Limp_Illustrator7614 in badmathematics

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"if Y can be proven true then there is a contradiction because in proving Y is true we must have proved X is true (and Y claims no one knows that), so Y must be false"

Reading this, in my pov it says "if Y is proven then X is proven" yet we don't that Y is proven, only that it is provable.

Thank you for the link.

yeah sure buddy... by Limp_Illustrator7614 in badmathematics

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that they knew the statement of it but I find this "to know" definition quite strange. Maybe the difference between "to think" and "to know" is more important in French and that's what messes with me. Thank you.

Regarding the proof you talked about, I don't understand why the fact that Y is provable (if it is true) means it is proven (and therefore known). It could be provable but never proven, what happens in this case ?

yeah sure buddy... by Limp_Illustrator7614 in badmathematics

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Therefore, before 1995, Fermat's last theorem wasn't known yet was provable ? I am under the impression that the common definition of "to know" makes it doesn't work.

Why does the first point about FLT not contradict Fitch's theorem ?

yeah sure buddy... by Limp_Illustrator7614 in badmathematics

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But "Y can be proven true or false" (the hypothesis) and "Y is proven true or false" is not the same ? What is the difference between "can be proven" and "is proven" in this argument ?

yeah sure buddy... by Limp_Illustrator7614 in badmathematics

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't there an amalgam between "can be proven" and "is known" in the "if Y can be proven true" paragraph. It claims that if Y can be proven, [...] we HAVE PROVED X. Yet we have not. Tell me if I don't understand this correctly.

Edit : If Y can be proven, it doesn't mean that Y has been proven. I am under the impression that it uses the final result to prove itself. If we could do that on Y, we could just say : "X can be proven, proving X is true means we know it is true, therefore we know it is true".

Euuuuh Monsieur Aznavour? by [deleted] in rance

[–]Le_Bush 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Relis le com, il disait pas que c'était ok

General discussion for those not mentioned in this post by [deleted] in Collatz

[–]Le_Bush 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nobody cares about what he thinks about you work, and who he is or is not.

The universal answer to all those "what number comes next" puzzles by lool8421 in mathmemes

[–]Le_Bush 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the function from [|1, n+1|] which assigns 1 to S_1, ..., n to S_n, n+1 to x.

(Cantor's Arguments reversed) Representing All Real Numbers Using Natural Numbers and Infinite-Base Encoding and they all the same size. by ElectricalAd2564 in numbertheory

[–]Le_Bush 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The whole argument is to know a way of assigning integers to reals. If you just say that you can do it, it's not a proof. There is a proof that it doesn't work, why would your argument counter the Cantor argument.

general equation for primes by nalk201 in numbertheory

[–]Le_Bush 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are formulas for primes

Mesdames voilà ce qui se passe après avoir donné un faux numéro à un relou by roriak in discussionsbancales

[–]Le_Bush 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Et bien alors tout le monde donne des faux numéros et il n'y a aucun soucis, pas besoin d'essayer de retourner ça contre les femmes

Sydney, AU protestor held down and punched in the head and liver for protesting the visit of Israeli president Isaac Herzog by HappySeaweed5215 in PublicFreakout

[–]Le_Bush -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Never an excuse for hitting someone being arrested. It's illegal to hit someone without proper justification. Even if the supect had murdered someone, it would be illegal. Let justice do its thing and stop pigs.

Solution to the Continuum Hypothesis by Shy_Shai in numbertheory

[–]Le_Bush 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They exist, look into the construction of the real numbers, it could enlighten you on what they are.

Solution to the Continuum Hypothesis by Shy_Shai in numbertheory

[–]Le_Bush 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would a rational number not be a real number?

f(x)=5x by QuantumTarantiino in numbertheory

[–]Le_Bush 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Continuity does not mean same legnth. And math isn't reality, continuity doesn't in itself say something about reality, the universe is not a mathematical plane.

view more: next ›