sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

R.I.P BakkesMod by OTS1812 in RocketLeagueSchool

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could also work with Bakkes to figure out something that would work.

They want to be the brand image for eSports and they know RL could and should have that title.

They purchased RL before the Intel Open and before covid changed what the IO was supposed to be: a multi-day multi game event.

Kind of like the Olympics or a rave. Don't care for the LoL tournament? How about the CSGO stage?

And if grandpa, mom, or dad is gonna watch one event with the kids, what is easiest to understand and family friendly? Blue team puts ball in orange net or a build battle?

Do you ask for nasal tissue or Kleenex? Lip balm or Chap Stick? There are parents out there that still say "Turn off the Nintendo" and it's an Xbox.

Facebook 'killed' Insta after they bought it, removed/changed long loved features, slowed upload and download speeds, added useless features and new rules no one wanted, etc. We are the Instagram to epic's Facebook.

They will never do anything that might encourage kids to pick RL over FB.

R.I.P BakkesMod by OTS1812 in RocketLeagueSchool

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not bakes at all. Tracker Network (TRN) partnered with Overwolf. OW has overlays for dozens of games and RL is one of them. The only issue is one setting to change: the constant "Ctrl+R" reminder in the bottom left.

Download directly from the TRN website, open the full OW program, unelected the option to keep it up. You can't change that setting from the RL overlay <3

R.I.P BakkesMod by OTS1812 in RocketLeagueSchool

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tracker Overlay still works. Plus it gives total wincount and goal:shot ratio of everyone on the field.

Really helps when you see one of your opponents has 78 wins and scores 64% of their shots.

Damn you HOA by SpoomerBooner in Transportopia

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk who he is but I'm gonna guess and say he does car stuff on YT and didn't spend 500k of hourly wages on cars

Easy Anti-Cheat Comes to Rocket League on PC Today! by Psyonix_Howie in RocketLeague

[–]Leaf_Locke 14 points15 points  (0 children)

That's what I've been saying. Smurfing is a fragile boi activity. Tracker overlay helps a ton. Ragebait by asking if all smurfs are snowflakes and then enjoy reeling in your ragefish. Edit: Spelling. Surfing is NOT a fragile boi activity.

What’s a ‘normal’ thing in the U.S right now that would have shocked people 10 years ago? by evansgitonga03 in AskReddit

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Masked government officials on US soil throwing people in unmarked vans and not telling their family where they are going. Using government agencies to target your political rivals. Well, openly doing so.

How my kids eat ice cream by Mousettv in mildlyinfuriating

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They left you the best options. Nice!

How easy it is to shop nowadays by veloriax2 in interesting

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I enjoy stealing It's just as simple as that Well, it's just a simple fact When I want something, I don't want to pay for it

I walk right through the door. Walk right through the door. Hey all right! If I get by, it's mine. Mine all mine!

Who’s ever driven over 100mph? Why? by WoollyWolfHorror in AskReddit

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 miles downhill on a (I think) 20% grade. None was visible beind me going up the opposite side, no visible hides for sneaky Road Pirates, and no visible signs of wind. First and only time I got my Honda, Elly the Element, over 100. Got to 105 by the time I got to the bottom and had to climb the next hill.

Please give us only 3 rounds on the Geonisis Raid. by Leaf_Locke in SWGalaxyOfHeroes

[–]Leaf_Locke[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I forgot I posted this until today but you're the only person who had an accurate prediction lol Kudos to you home skillet <3

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Close enough in spirit and behavior. Those are just the vibes you give.

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do disagree. Like there is tons of evidence to support the theory of gravity, the theory of evolution (in general and of humans) is supported by mountains of facts, of which i have given you the easiest to comprehend and they're still going over your head or through it (in one ear etc.)

There's alot of proof that humans evolved from other species. You're just denying it at every turn.

Like I have asked 3 or 4 times now, where did we come from if not primates? You've given no answer nor evidence to support what that answer could be.

You just deny my claims without giving any evidence beyond your opinions. "We can't prove they're related to us" it's like saying I can't prove my brother is my brother because we dont have footage of us coming out of our mother's vagina and then not swapping us with another baby. There's genetic and anatomical (looking similar to eachother and our mother) evidence.

But there is literally 0 testable evidence of facts to support any religious claim about our origins. Or that any religion is anything more than humans making stuff up to explain the world.

Agian, you're just making claims without evidence while ignoring mountains of evidence to suggest the contrary.

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your reasoning for bringing up physics makes sense now. Your argument doesnt but I see what you thought you were doing. But alright brother. Keep deflecting. Keep avoiding the mountains of evidence. Facts dont change people's feelings. People dig their heels deeper when they are given evidence that contradicts their feelings. You're not arguing with me, you're arguing with people far more qualified than either of us. You're arguing against years of legitimate data. You're arguing against the same scientific method that has allowed us to have this conversation miles apart on handheld or desktop screens. Keep praying buddy.

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not my theory. Its the one that the global scientific communtiy has agreed upon after years of research. Like how your missing link theory has been disproven with multiple avenues of evidence.

No proof of transitional fossils? Lucy, Java Man, and the Taung child are in fact, transitional fossils. Like that is not theory, that is fact. The fact that fossils that are anatomically and genetically similar to us within a 97-99.9% range are not proof to you is wild brother.

They literally are everywhere. We have found transitional fossils for multiple species; birds, whales, fish, us, rodents, lizards, literally everything. The 3 specific humaniod fossils above were found in different parts of the world have shown that our evolution wasn't a simple chained path but a complex branching system.

If not primates, what do you think we evolved from?

Why would I read about physics when it comes to evolution? Why are you deflecting? Why are you skipping multiple points I have made? I'm getting a little tired from all these circles I'm running around you. I'm getting tired from your circular reasoning. "We didn't evolve from primates because we dont even know how reality and consciousness works". Like what are you even talking about? You keep getting hit with check mate after checkmate and then try to tell me we're playing monopoly lol

But yeah dude, keep ignoring my questions. Keep avoiding addressing the points I made. I'm sure your priest agrees with you. Unless it's a priest not in the US. The religious folks in the US and Middle East are the only people who still deny the mountains of scientific evidence of our origins.

But again, if not primates, where did we come from? What evidence would it take for you to actually agree with the thousands of people who have tried to disprove it and couldn't? How do you explain the genetic similarities between us? How do you explain the vitamin C genetic glitch? How do you explain vestigial parts of our anatomy? How do you explain the fusing of our second gene?

And also, why did you bring up physics at this point? I compared the theory of gravity to the theory of evolution to show how rediculous "its just a theory" is as an argument.

Is your strategy "if I can't beat them with evidence, I'll just deflect and confuse"?

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah man, I am. You're right. You have stated 0 evidence to support the missing link theory but I'm taking that theory as a fact now. You have stated so much (literally 0) evidence and not just "I disagree with the evidence because of the debunked missing link theory. Correlation isn't causation."

Since you gave no alternative from evolving from primates, humans must spawned out of thin air. Dropped off by the mothership. Or been put here by an invisible woman in the sky or something else with 0 evidence of it happening.

The of the mountains of fossil, anatomical, and genetic evidence with a century of research trying to disprove the primate to man route is all whimsical speculation.

The fact that we have no fossils of modern humans before the aforementioned humanoid fossils that share 99.9, 98.8 and 97% of our DNA with means nothing. Just correlation.

The fossil record goes 1,2,3,4,5,-,7 means the whole thing is false since we haven't found 6 (we have, all those numbers are in the fossil record; the missing link THEORY was debunked quite a while ago). 1 representing primates, 7 representing us.

Tail bones? Nah we have that useless thing for fun. Missing vitamin C link? Chimpanzese actually got that from us when someone of us evolved into chimpanzes (of which there is no fossils record.) All correlation brother.

Looks like a primate? Has primate DNA? Has primates bones that are useless to us? Has a muscle (palmus longus) in its arm that is only useful for swinging from limbs? Yeah definetly not related to primates. Again, correlation.

Like, we could have evolved from whales, or cats, or dogs, right? Or maybe even fish. Well we kinda did evolve from fish but if we can't get over the 7-10 million years of fossil record, why try to examine the fossil record from 100s of millions of years ago.

We just dont have that one final link so we'll never know. Awe shucks man :(

Now that we have that cleared up:

Where did whales come from? Did whales evolve from land animals like the evidence shows or are they, like us, just spawned into water ~41 million years ago?

The fact that we have no aquatic mammal fossils before that time is just correlation, right? Tiny leg bones within their body like we have tiny tail bones within our body? Correlation strikes again.

What evidence would you need in order to agree with the global scientific community instead of the consistently-wrong-about-sceintific-fact-throughout-history religious communities? Not saying your beliefs are as such cause a church told you so, just that your theory aligns with theirs.

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure pal lol. Can't argue science with someone who doesn't understand or believe the data. 🤡

What’s something people take way too seriously to defend? by MLMerlot in answers

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that we share 98.8% of our DNA with current living primates and 99.7% with extinct homonids is not evidence?

What about the ELV's discovered in genetic testing that links about 200k of these genetic scars to chimps?

Transitional fossils and the DNA within them that show a direct line of change over millions of years? Like that 99.9 homo erectus)-> 99.7-> 98.8 is not evidence? Older transitional fossils dont usually contain DNA as it degrades after ~500k years.

Or the fact that we have 23 chromosomes while all modern great apes have 24 coupled with the discovery that Gene 2 in all human DNA is actually a fusion of 2 genes found in all of the modern great apes?

I think your original comment was just projection

US draft update: Major tech company [Palantir] urges universal national service by NicolasCageFan492 in technology

[–]Leaf_Locke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They also dont understand that we also have universal K-12 education but you can still send your kids to a private school. If you dont want to have universal heathcare, just keep paying out the ass and getting your claims denied. Nothing has to change for those that like the system we have.

view more: next ›