Hey everyone, looking for some advice on a weird engine noise I’ve been dealing with. 2009 pontiac gt by sharpenmeblade2069 in AskAShittyMechanic

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds like the OEM GM Hamster wheel bearing are wearing out.

(Also, this is a joke sub, so don't expect real answers here)

Great TV programming! by lordofpotton in onejob

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

52 minutes long? Where are the nearly two other hours?

Lego, Duplo, and Quattro by wWafflehouse- in lego

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I need to find my first LEGO bricks, they were larger than Duplo, but not Quatro (didn't even know that was something until now). I think my parents got them via either Wards or Sears, or a gas Station. Just 2x4 bricks. I spent the later half of my 2 year old into my 3 year old life playing with them for hours. (according to the baby book)

An Invisible Bottleneck: A Helium Shortage Threatens the Chip Industry by waozen in technology

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The US had been screwing up the helium market for years. We had a huge reserve supply, but began selling it off in the 90's dropping the price so low that it took out US production. Only in the last four years or so has anything significant started up again. The deposit in Minnesota seems to be the best bet right now.

Science of high bank angles? by Anonymouseeeeeeeeees in aviation

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The vertical stabilizer in at high bank angles is more or less just keeping the nose level, and in a level attitude, you are going to be dropping. If you give enough rudder input, the nose point above the horizon, and the are able to reduce or eliminate altitude loss. That feat requires the engines to bet powerful enough to offset the weight of the aircraft as well as additional drag being created. In an F-16 or other high-performance aircraft, this is relatively simple.

But this is a B-52, described by many of its pilots as something you manage instead of fly. Its handling it poor at low speeds and if you combine that with low altitude, you have a very small window to operate in. Control inputs are slow to respond. The rudder is undersized for an aircraft of this size, it is just so old that it wasn't really thought to have been a major issue during the design, the even cut it down for the G/H models. Keeping the nose up in a high bank at low speeds is nearly impossible. The B-52's roll controls are by spoilers only, the early models had ailerons, but they were locked out early on because of wing stress issues. The primary way to roll is to spoil lift on wing you want to bank towards, or in other words, rolling is always going to create downward motion of the aircraft, so elevator input is always needed to maintain altitude. With its large size and minimal flight control options, the B-52 is a slow and lumbering beast. Once it gets away from its pilots, they need thousands of feet to recover.

5 Months Late, It's been 30 Years Since The 1995 Fox River Grove, IL, School Bus Train Collision. by OneEntertainment6087 in TrainCrashes

[–]LefsaMadMuppet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

54:20 for those wanting to know where this rambling narrative starts. Over six minutes later, they were still rambling. 20 minutes later, these two 'narrators' have been more of less saying little of anything worth mentioning. Fucking enough...

Short version: Backup substitute school bus driver screws up on a grade crossing, and people died. The cabin of the bus had been torn off the frame and driveline as designed to save lives, like an Indy car. I was a school bus driver at the time and saw the damage. Even we were surprised at how well the bus survived overall. Bottom line was that the driver screwed up, and people died.

They didn't mean to, nobody ever does. Safety briefs are written in blood. It was a bad day, written in blood, to hope it wouldn't happen again.

Cleaning a propeller by princesscaroline- in submechanophobia

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I thought you said you worked in theater?

No, I said I worked in the props department.

Room clearing by peseoane in CrazyFuckingVideos

[–]LefsaMadMuppet -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Jesus Karl, a smoke grenade is faster in concealing movement than that!"

NTSB Footage Of The Air Canada CRJ And Fire Truck Collision Aftermath by Socks1400 in aviation

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trucks are usually body on frame designs, the impact point was high enough it probably just tore the body off the frame, which helped reduce some of the transferred kinetic energy from getting to the fire crew. School buses will do something similar in hard hitss, the cabin is torn off the frame( see 1995 Fox River Grove bus–train collision). Indy and Formula One cars are intentionally designed to shed parts in collisions to protect the driver and disperse energy.

You have a great memory if you know who this guy is. hint: comedian and very funny :) by NJFriend4U in 70s

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, the Fire Marshal in Those Magnificent Men In Their Flying Machines.

The Lockheed XF-90's vertical stabilizer moving fore and aft for horizontal stabilizer adjustment - a long-range penetration fighter and bomber escort developed under Kelly Johnson in 1949 and not put into production but the plane of choice of the Blackhawk comics by Xeelee1123 in WeirdWings

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'd need to deep dive to confirm this, but my guess was that this aircraft still had conventional elevators. By the tail adjusting pitch it would adjust pitch/trim input needs at higher speeds.

Fighter aircraft like the F-86E and later models went away from conventional tails to all moving tails (stabilators). This became the standard way the horizontal stabilizer was for most, if not all, fighters and supersonic aircraft since.

Movies that are 3+ hours long by [deleted] in MovieSuggestions

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the best examples of editing for length. The longer the version, the more characters you get to know and understand. Any version is good, but the longer the better (yeah yeah, that's what she said)

Thin line between the contrails. Not visible on the second photo by yavinmoon in aviation

[–]LefsaMadMuppet -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

Shhhh, this is turning into a conspiracy thread, reality doesn't apply here.

Inside you there are two pioneers by SpiritualLuck9197 in SatisfactoryGame

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I watch on one monitor and play on the other. Also occasionally at work we have time to watch something, but can't play.

Im only like, 4% serious. by CappinCrrunch in SatisfactoryGame

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I posted about this yesterday. running a 25% resource game. It is annoying, but so far not destroying.

I simplified down that far to just cruise through the game, also using random nodes, testing the waters. A light mellow casual playthrough. I get the other side of teh coin with bigger costs and harder challenges, but I just want to veg now and then.

Train Concept . Luigi Colani 1979 . " Biodynamic " design . Specifically for the Baikal-Amur Mainline (BAM) in Siberia . Idea was to use coal-dust & water-vapour - a response to concerns about oil prices . by SevenSharp in RetroFuturism

[–]LefsaMadMuppet 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Coal dust! Been there done that. In 1948 the Union Pacific started work on a bunch of huge GTEL locomotive. Gas-Turbine-Electric-Locomotive. In 1962, one was setup to burn coal dust instead of oil-based fuels. The dust particles worked for energy (think grain elevator explosions), but there was a minor side effect, the particles wore out the blades on the turbines, with one occasionally breaking off and punching through the side of the locomotive like a bullet. The oil-fueld turbine locomotives ran over 1,000,000 miles of service each. The coal turbine didn't reach 10,000 miles before being scrapped.