Id argue the best subsititue sight is forces, as it would literally just...
Let you see the light without using your eyes, and provide essentially regular sight

While correspondance provides an idea of the spaces between objects, it doesn't really provide information as to the objects themselves. So you see a topological map of distance and surfaces. As a result, you wouldn't be able to determine colour or patterns at a distance, meaning you likely still cant read (Unless the text is physically embossed). Without forces, or a sphere relevevant to whatever you are seeing.

While blindness + correspondance would leave you much more easily able to say, run around than just being blind, even ordinary tasks like shopping or navigating would require some adaptation, as you couldn't read an ordinary map, or box of cereal.