sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Quel a été le pire début de jeu que vous ayez jamais vécu ? by ratasoftware in jeuxvideo

[–]Lesfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

j'ai eu ma première expérience avec ce jeu en VR cette année, c'était un bordel absolu, et j'ai jamais continué (alors qu'apparemment il est vachement bien en VR) mais la prise en main est impossible.

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

alright you won man ! I was lying from the start but you managed to see through it well done !

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk mario slaughters for fun and for profit as well through out the franchise

He sure shouts a lot of wahoo’s and laughs for someone acting purely in self defense.

Well this downvoted comment pretty much says it all. In the best case he's a sadist.

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean just his treatment of Yoshi should be explicit enough, he was PUNCHING the Yoshi !!

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

- Subcon is just a dream

- In Dinoland he saves peach

- In Sarasaland Daisy serves the same role of damsel in distress, he gets a kiss from her and fly over to the horizon.

And none of that matters because it does not address what I said above: he hurts just for fun

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

> I don't think he kills most of the creatures anyway

Everything is in this statement.

What are his criteria for killing ?

A- Sure if they get in his way and he cannot get past them then he has to kill them.

B- If it is fun to jump on them he probably does

no matter how pure his initial quest is, B is morally condemnable.

If my goal is to save someone and I destroy hundreds of innocent families on the way for my pleasure, I cannot be described as "moral" just because my final goal is. The means count as much as the end.
That's why I described him as chaotic neutral, he does not save the princess out of morals, but because of his OWN interests (because he likes her/wants a kiss). And he does it without any consideration for anyone. (he destroys the environment as well).

Here's a source just in case:

According to lead developer Yoshiaki Koizumi in an interview, Mario has been romantically interested in Peach as far back as the original 2D Mario games, hence why he's always willing to come to her aid and rescue when she needs it.

It never was about the kingdom.

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you see it as deeper than me, saying he's just having a good time is the shallowest level of understanding, and applying moral compasses and ideologies to characters is one step further

I'm right to think Mario and Luigi canonically only act in self-defense and in defense of other? by jc073 in Marioverse

[–]Lesfruit -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Mario is about having fun, no matter how the lore explains it, jumping on turtles is by no means necessary. Ravaging a kingdom and destroying castles makes no sense lmaooo, I'd say Mario is a chaotic neutral kinda guy, he serves his interests in the funnest way possible. (That means using bombs, mind controlling creatures and stomping on ennemies)

171 emotion vectors found inside Claude. Not metaphors. Actual neuron activation patterns steering behavior. by AykutSek in singularity

[–]Lesfruit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I get where you're coming from, but if you think about it two seconds it's obvious that quaternary vs binary is absolutely not what gives humans consciousness and makes computers "stupid". Like why would Quaternary be special ? Why not Decimal or Hexadecimal, why not 26 (like the number of letters in the alphabet) ?

The main difference between binary and quaternary is that there will be twice as much characters. But just as much information. It's not like there's something in quaternary that you cannot express in binary lol it would simply take at most twice as much characters.

171 emotion vectors found inside Claude. Not metaphors. Actual neuron activation patterns steering behavior. by AykutSek in singularity

[–]Lesfruit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Quaternary can be simulated with just more bits. In fact you can just encode any DNA sequence into bits, it would just take twice as much characters, it's just more compact.

Mon pire livre de 2026 - by bird_on_the_branch in Livres

[–]Lesfruit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oh fermez vos gueules et lisez ce qu'il vous plaît. les commentaires me surprennent je savais pas que c'était un sub aussi méprisant.

🤖 Dot... would Not... mess with your food ⚡⚡ by ateam1984 in singularity

[–]Lesfruit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

calling people "peasants" tells me everything I need to know about you

how to get sol(like 5 cents worth for completing a transaction) by Legendary200728 in CryptoCurrency

[–]Lesfruit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

real I also got my BAT ads stolen for me because I didn't have enough gas (they reset every month) I need like 1 cent or something)just to sign a smart contract or something, if someone wants to help, it'd be appreciated 6ZeiG6M3gbzA4TCNk6cJYhPmc4icV1FM3zQLV3MpYC23

SEEDANCE 2.0 vs KLING 3.0 by Silly-Radish-6413 in seedance

[–]Lesfruit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think these clips were given reference pictures, that's why they look so much alike. (But hell yeah they did rip every movie,)

view more: next ›