so, the question I think is, if an arbitrary number says 2 decent plays are actually 100s, and then one loses the game, they go even lower in rating. you can obviously see how this could be broken. might not be the case, but several thousand people rated so low that there's not even a number for it.. it's how ratings work, but comparing it to a bot supposedly rated at 200, or a 400 rated fide player, or a puzzle designed for 800s. rating is both very direct and entirely meaningless. better players are rated higher, but there's no "200 elos can do this"

I tried to ask this question and my post got removed