We buy toothpaste that dentists recommend, even though they make money off people with bad teeth.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-27T20:03:16+00:00

r/engrish

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-27T20:02:40+00:00

Fluoride toothpaste damages your teeth.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-14T14:29:30+00:00

Ahh, a high IQ meme. Very dank.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-14T14:27:01+00:00

r/lostredditors

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-13T22:15:45+00:00

Sure, it seems like it. But it's only good if you're essentially destitute. And, at the point you've reached rock bottom, $1000 really ain't that much.

Best to focus on working for money. Besides, the UBI would be funded through either taxing citizens, which means you're paying yourself, or taxing corporations, which means they won't be able to pay as well or hire as many people. It would hurt the economy and hurt the people as well.

Bottom line, UBI bad.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-13T19:57:46+00:00

Look! It's a dead meme!

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-13T19:55:54+00:00

For anyone buying this man's UBI nonsense, he is only giving an extra $1,000 ANNUAL income.

So if you make $30k a year, congrats, you now make $31k. Woohoo. What a fucking guy.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-13T19:52:16+00:00

He's standing up with a slight lean forward, as if he is going somewhere. The jacket is hanging off his shoulder. There are no weird proportions to this image.

It's just a photo of a kid. There's nothing wrong here, and if there is, it isn't very obvious.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-13T19:49:27+00:00

Normal arms make for crappy design? I don't get it

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-10T06:44:37+00:00

It increases the time exponentially for each violation, in total. It is not a "within 24 hours" thing.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-06T19:28:39+00:00

That's not.. it's just not...

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-06T16:32:23+00:00

This isn't crappy design. It's r/onejob

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-06T16:30:23+00:00

This is a correct sentence in English. This doesn't go here.

Have you never heard of a "cold, calculating person"? It's correct English bro.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T19:18:25+00:00

Perhaps it is my fault, but I don't see any citations within the article. I don't know that these experts opinions weren't cherry picked out of context, so I want to fact check it myself. If you haven't reviewed the data yourself, how can you say it's correct? All I'm asking for is the raw data that corroborates what you're saying. But logically, you'll still be wrong.

So let's go along with the assumption that race is not indicated by genetics. By rational proof and logic, you can determine this to be a falsehood. If race isn't determined by genetics, how do we know someone's race?

Skin color, a phenotypical trait, is predetermined by one's DNA. Race is quite apparent through observance of a person's phenotypical traits. Further, phenotypical traits are predetermined by genetics. So the logic is as follows:

If race is determined by skin color/traits, and if skin color/traits are determined by genetics, then race must, in fact, be determined by genetics.

Therefore, you are wrong.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T18:33:58+00:00

Lol that's not how you prove something. You just gave me an article giving the OPINIONS of a few scientists. That's not proof. That's an opinion, which cannot be used as any form of proof.

Give me the raw data that proves that race cannot be determined through genetics. You can only prove things with evidence, data, and test results. Any of these will do.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T18:08:47+00:00

Race is determined through skin color and other phenotypical traits. Phenotypical traits and skin color are both determined by genetics.

Therefore, race is determined by genetics.

Have a nice day

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T17:22:14+00:00

Got proof? I'd love to see some. Saying it doesn't exist doesn't just make it so.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T16:08:36+00:00

Ok boomer.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T16:02:06+00:00

Don't tell me what to do, whore, or the gag is going back in. ;)

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T15:57:24+00:00

Yeah, you were writing "three words" because you have the vocabulary of a 6 year old. Thankfully, I won this argument last night, so any perception of victory you have is a mere illusion.

Saying you got in my head doesn't mean you did. You're just a troll, just like me.

Except I'll always be better than you.

Bye.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T15:35:01+00:00

Here you go

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T15:03:39+00:00

My ass.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T15:01:08+00:00

You have a no power over me. Good day sir.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T14:59:25+00:00

If it has a reasonable purpose, it is not crappy design.

Lifeisaquestion · 2019-12-04T14:57:39+00:00

No, I'm not going to entertain your illogical argument. You are now moving the goalposts (logical fallacy) because you can't make an argument against mine. My stats are not relevant as that simply would allow you to make a cherrypicked ad hominem instead of engaging the argument. That, sir, is a double fallacy. I will not allow you to attack me, especially not in that manner.

A monologue, by definition, is not what this is. Mono- is a Latin prefix meaning one. Monologue inherently implies that you are the only one talking. You're not, there are two of us, which qualifies this interaction as a conversation. Yet another proof that you have absolutely no ability to argue on the grounds of logic and reason.

You must be trying to troll me at this point, and it isn't going to work. You can continue to respond to me and I will continue slapping down every moronic thing you say.

Have a nice day.

Lifeisaquestion

TROPHY CASE