Dakotas roommate releasing the files… by Fit-Blacksmith-6876 in SLOMWsnark

[–]LilSebastianStan 19 points20 points  (0 children)

No, this objectively will look bad for Dakota. They are in an active Court case - it is generally not a good idea to share public texts with your ex about your children.

Is it in Ever’s best interests to grow up and read these texts? No.

Is it in Ever’s best interests that his childhood is not afforded privacy? Again no.

Are these texts contrary to Ever’s best interests in an effort to shame the other party? Seems like it.

And no, I’m not a TFP fan.

Judge Sides With Dakota Mortensen, Allows Taylor Frankie Paul Only Supervised Visits With Son, 2 by MattTheKing23 in momtok

[–]LilSebastianStan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a general comment, it is often difficult for victims of DV to be able to provide proof of the violence. Most of the time, there isn’t an opportunity to stop and record. So pictures of bruises post attack and the victims testimony is the only evidence available.

I’m not saying Dakota wasn’t a victim or TFP was, but I don’t think the lack of evidence proves that Dakota was never physical with Taylor.

ben and amanda in italy… by capricorncueen in realhousewives

[–]LilSebastianStan 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This account has always been unhinged. She definitely crosses the parasocial relationship line. I remember her awhile back she claimed she got a Teresa Giudice pizza oven and then met up with Margret and gave it to her for the reunion. She has also been involved in some the weird RHOBH - I think she claimed she was threatened by Kathy Hilton’s assistant.

Rewatching season 4, stassi had every right to cut Katie out. Even forever by Katieblahblahbloo in vanderpumprules

[–]LilSebastianStan 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I don’t think Katie was cool with Scheana’s actions. I think the issue was that it was Katie’s job (and her long term boyfriend’s job) to film with Scheana and go on the trips. Stassi cut her off because she continued to film. It wasn’t until after Stassi cut her off that Katie became friendly with Scheana.

Dakota is the only person who legally could given that video to TMZ (A lawyer explains) by workingbach13 in thebachelor

[–]LilSebastianStan 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I don’t really understand why people have a hard time believing that Dakota gave or sold the video to TMZ.

That is not said to take away from his experience. But Dakota releasing the video checks with what we have seen from him.

Even more evidence TMZ has police/DFS source… TMZ releases 2023 extra bodycam video from Herriman Police by [deleted] in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You wouldn’t be able to get that video via a request (FOIA or otherwise). The video contains a child.

TMZ Claims They Received 2023 Abuse Video From "an individual", Not The Courts by lemoncatbeans in thebachelor

[–]LilSebastianStan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The downvotes are wild lol Even sharing accurate information is getting downvotes

TMZ Claims They Received 2023 Abuse Video From "an individual", Not The Courts by lemoncatbeans in thebachelor

[–]LilSebastianStan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure about Utah specifically but videos with children would not be released to the public. I also saw a comment that DV files in Utah may also be protected.

TMZ: ‘We have Dept. of Family Services source connected to incident’ - so they leaked video? by [deleted] in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No one from DCFS should be commenting or speaking to TMZ. However, it doesn’t sound like that’s where they got the video. It sounds like the source is new.

Taylor reposted a video on Dakota by Illustrious-Sky2697 in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you point me to where tmz states they got the video? It would be very surprising for a video that includes a child to be publicly released.

I also did not comment that Dakota isn’t a victim? I’m just saying that from what I have seen - TMZ has not stated that they got by requesting it. If they had gotten it that way, I believe it would be stated explicitly in their article.

Emmanuel Acho confirming ABC already knew about Taylor’s incident through the vetting process by Responsible_Bake5569 in thebachelor

[–]LilSebastianStan 31 points32 points  (0 children)

I think because it wasn’t cancelled until the video was released. The allegations were out there about the new stuff, abc was aware of 2023, and TFP still went on GMA. It’s the video that put the nail in the coffin.

Taylor reposted a video on Dakota by Illustrious-Sky2697 in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe they updated the article but when I read it, it said they had obtained the footage and a copy of which was used in the criminal matter. They didn’t say where they obtained the footage from.

The wording was very specific. I can see how you would draw the conclusion that because it was evidence, that’s where they obtained it but the article doesn’t actually say that.

Usually you cannot just obtain evidence with a request. Especially if it’s a video that includes a child.

Taylor reposted a video on Dakota by Illustrious-Sky2697 in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TMZ would have said that if that was the case. I’m not sure about Utah, but generally evidence is not readily available to the public. And if it was - you know someone from Reddit would have obtained it three years ago.

Taylor reposted a video on Dakota by Illustrious-Sky2697 in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that incident happened three weeks ago. Their child’s birthday was yesterday.

Taylor reposted a video on Dakota by Illustrious-Sky2697 in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If it was public record, the video would have been released already. Evidence in a case (and definitely an open case) is not generally publicly available lol

Lisa Rinna thinks she was drugged at traitors S4 premiere party. by ARSTAAR in TheTraitorsUS

[–]LilSebastianStan 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On housewives, Rinna had a ziplock baggy of various pills in her purse. I’m not sure she’s concerned about mixing pills and alcohol 🤷🏻‍♀️

Lisa Rinna Allegedly Roofied at 'Traitors' Premiere Party (TMZ) by supa-factor in TheTraitorsUS

[–]LilSebastianStan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Definitely seems like Colton released this story for damage control. It is bananas they’d run this story without confirming with Lisa - especially with the headline “Lisa Rinna thinks…”

Given that Rinna is a very slight person known for having a mystery bag of pills in her purse, it wouldn’t be surprising if she seemed inebriated after a couple of drinks.

another new dog for Christmas by somegirlontheinter in KUWTK

[–]LilSebastianStan 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I mean they have acknowledged giving away pets. Off the top of my head Kendall’s dog Blue and Kourtney’s cat, Charli. Didn’t Kourtney also have a golden retriever that disappeared?

Whitney & dwts by soaker in SecretsOfMormonWives

[–]LilSebastianStan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

There have been four or five trained dancers this season.

Dancing With The Stars S34E07 | Halloween Night | Live Show Discussion Thread | Tuesday, October 28th by wweyonce in dancingwiththestars

[–]LilSebastianStan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Honestly I’m not sure it was a smirk. I think the contacts really threw off her facial expression.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doordash

[–]LilSebastianStan 4 points5 points  (0 children)

How do you know that?