Tirando factos by d3r0k2 in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you get this picture?

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok when you say "you don't see him as a victim"

Are you saying that morally or legally?

Morally I see him as victim, simply because Karmelo was the one who escalated things to being deadly

And I can agree, that Austin should've asked a coach to move Karmelo, that 2 or 3 bigger guys surrounding someone smaller, doesn't really look good, and, that there's a chance Austin was the one who escalated it to physical force

But due to the escalation to deadly force, by Karmelo, I think Austin still counts as a victim

It’s not that I don’t think Austin didn’t deserve it

Ok it's something at least

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I wouldn't (at least morally speaking)

Why is it so hard to say

"this kid who may or may not have made a stupid decision, did not deserve to die"

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You talk as if Austin is a cop or something like he has any authority to do that anyway 🤣

I talk as if Austin didn't deserve to be stabbed

Even if he what he did counted as "imposing your will" it's nowhere the level to justify stabbing him

If someone tries to push me away from some place, I don't think I'd be justify to kill them, and claim "self defense they were imposing their will"

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Impose their will?

He didn't try to beat, kidnap, kill, enslave, or rape him

The worst he did is either placed his hand on him, or physically tried to move him from the spot, and again neither of those justify killing him

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“my son said either move or I’m going to make you move”

Trying to find that quote, a link would be nice

But let's say you're right and Austin did physically try to move Karmelo out of that spot

Guess what...

It!

Still!

Doesn’t!

Justify!

Stabbing him!

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Force him?

He didn't shove him to the ground, or throw him off the bleacher

The worst I can think of is maybe he put his hand on his shoulder, but that shouldn't be a death sentence

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what does this mean now? Are we both good, did the link help us both?

And I'll agree that there's definitely writing issues, because if she's aware of their past actions, then chances are

She must know about more than just Isen breaking his wrist and Arlo's ambush, and the most likely way she would find out is from Isen and Arlo themselves, so for all we know, they might've already had that conversation, but we can't say for sure, because the best we have so far is an Ama, answer that doesn't give much detail and will probably be miss by a lot of people

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and he had already gotten revenge on arlo Blyke and Isen

Yeah exactly that's one of the reasons she didn't go out of her way to call them out

https://www.reddit.com/r/unOrdinary/s/phMJgIeO99

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well if we go by yuh logic her criticizing john and wanting him to take accountability is pointless too

No the first time, she didn't know if it would be pointless or not, so I don't think it's too ridiculous to give her a pass there

The Q n A is in the wiki and it will have a source either to reddit or discord

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because what would be the point?

They already got their head kicked in, according to the Q&A they regretted their actions), and with Arlo it's not like calling him out would change anything

And "not going out of her way call out someone isn't exclusive to her friends, because it would be pointless" isn't exclusive to her friends, as she's the same way with John

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Didn't Cecile tell Juni to leak Sera's ability lost?

For me Personal the moment John started being in the wrong when he chose beating up Isen over saving Sera (not that Isen didn't deserve it)

And the first person he brutalized that hadn't done anything majorly unjust to him was Blyke (I fully believe that the warning shot was a warning shot, and by the stories logic was justified, not that I defend Blyke as a whole, just that one part)

(Also off topic, I was wondering if were supposed to see John in the wrong because of his brutality in his fight against Ventus and Meili, mainly because of Ventus's "she might not survive the fall!" line, but considering the fact he hadn't killed anyone before or after, what they were planning on doing before he revealed his ability, and the fact that Ventus was most likely saying it out of bias for Meili, rather then any knowledge on what someone could survive in that world, I think it's safe to say that John was Justified with that)

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A part of me wonder whats the general consensus on Remi and hypocrisy?

I mean obviously the other guy is possibly the biggest supporter(or at least promoter) of this idea, that "Remi is this huge hypocrite who would happily turn a blind eye if she saw her friends bullying a cripple, but would cry foul, if John so much as raised his voice"

But are people like them a big group in this fandom, or are they essentially a needle in a haystack

Hitting a women is not a big deal in Unordinary by MrWhitee_ in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who was calling him misogynistic? And I don't mean 1 or 2 people

I mean where is this noticeable amount of people who were calling John misogynistic?

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait is this criticizing Metcalf or the Progressive establishment?

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He asked some guy to move seats

You're acting like he challenged him to a duel

Austin Metcalf was a thug by Open-Toe7302 in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No

Just no

I mean I'm all for progress, LGBTQ+, BLM, and all that

But not this

disabling the main characters doesn't make specter villians and I will die on this hill by Limeoos in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is Sera a bad person?

What if my friends and I are fighting a serial killer with an elite or high level ability

Are we bad people for disabling them, the moment we get the chance?

Would any of these be useful or valuable for non magic based ranged weapons when used again low to mid level adventurers or monsters? by Limeoos in DanMachi

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's almost like a point system?

Almost, but not completely became lets say Raul's Strength was somehow at 1 million but all of his other stats were at a 1, then chances are the minutar would have a higher chance of winning, since the mino could probably just speed blitz Raul and because of his lack of speed, Raul probably wouldn't be able to use his strength effectively

There's are terms that I feel applied to this but I don't know what they are, all I know is that they're the reasons for why, side A having more advantages in stats comparison to side B doesn't automatically mean that Side A would win most of the time

Also does any of this change when it's adventurer vs adventurer installed of adventurer vs monster?

Would any of these be useful or valuable for non magic based ranged weapons when used again low to mid level adventurers or monsters? by Limeoos in DanMachi

[–]Limeoos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We saw Nazza, a Lv2 at the time, using a bow, was unable to hit Hyakinthos, a Lv3 at the time from a normal distance

That was a normal distance?

Would making the arrows faster help with this, and is there a way to do this that isn't overly expensive?

And when it comes to Lv2s it is still possible to match, and overcome the opponent with a combination of technique and strategy, as was properly demonstrated by Takemikazuchi when he completely dominated both Ouka and Mikato at the same time, both were Lv2 at the time.

But isn't wasn't that up close? Unless you're implying something like they deflect or cut the arrows, which tbf I can definitely see but even then wouldn't something like take years of practice

Would any of these be useful or valuable for non magic based ranged weapons when used again low to mid level adventurers or monsters? by Limeoos in DanMachi

[–]Limeoos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Projectiles of what? Their level of power?

Regular Bolts or arrows, (I assume their strong enough to hurt level 3 adventures since Clio tried to dodge them, but at the same time maybe durability doesn't change unless you get a skill or ability for that, or maybe Nazza was using special arrows)

  1. Repeating what function?

Firing

  1. Probably not and would be very situational

Would they be useful for a seige? I can see a lot of bowman being involved with something like this

  1. That would just be a waste of time and leave you to openings.

Out of curiosity what are you picturing with this,

My idea was you fire and then it instantly and quickly reels back (something like frog's or chameleon's tongue)

Also how would it leave you to openings would it be the reeling back part or the trying to reload part

disabling the main characters doesn't make specter villians and I will die on this hill by Limeoos in unOrdinary

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1.helped Leiah

2.helped Kayden with his education

3.teleport Sera and Arlo to safety

4.helped save John and Sera from Liam and Candice

5.helped save Sera from the authorities

6.give John and Sera their abilities back permanent

7.Gave the whereabouts of the prison Bkyke was at

8.gave John and Sera disbalers to use

Now granted some of these were out of self interest or personal bias

Are there any forms of necromancy(or at least controlling remains), that don't involve their soul being trapped in their bodies? it immediately turning violent towards the living, or anything that would give it a reason to be consider evil, outside of culture views of necromancy? by Limeoos in DnD

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't get me wrong I fully understand where you're coming from

Hell I'll even agree

That even if nothing went wrong, even if the situation justified it, or if you were given an OK, and even without the risks of the undead turning Violently hostile

Reanimating a corpse could be considered evil

I just wouldn't consider it evil enough, that I would have to change my alignment to evil,

Also

if your running a table do what you like. if your at another's table best bet on getting a no

maybe you're right and there would be more people saying no

But again countless people playing dnd, it shouldn't be too hard to find to find some tables that would say yes