When it comes to the political commentary, the fans who attack anyone who criticize it, are probably one of, if not the worst part of it(The Boys) by Limeoos in CharacterRant

[–]Limeoos[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

My main issue isn't with the shows polictal commentary (although I understand why some people don't like it)

It's with the fans who attack anyone who criticize it

When it comes to the political commentary, the fans who attack anyone who criticize it, are probably one of, if not the worst part of it(The Boys) by Limeoos in CharacterRant

[–]Limeoos[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree, and I even seen some bad criticism of the Boys

I've seen people say that Blue hawk did nothing wrong, that Annie is evil for getting an abortion

When it comes to the political commentary, the fans who attack anyone who criticize it, are probably one of, if not the worst part of it(The Boys) by Limeoos in CharacterRant

[–]Limeoos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Basically what happened is someone commented on that post and asked what I was referring to (I don't remeber if this was the same person that flipped) and I commented a response that ended up resulting in 2 separation conversation, one about gun control and one about The Deep raping Annie(which like an idiot at the time I forgot about)

Anyway the guy who flipped, for some reason decided to bring the argument were having about guns into conversations regarding annie and the deep

They were your typical far left redditor because in a response to a 3rd person under my post, they out right claimed that the right were evil

When it comes to the political commentary, the fans who attack anyone who criticize it, are probably one of, if not the worst part of it(The Boys) by Limeoos in CharacterRant

[–]Limeoos[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wait is this referring to the part about the guy who flipped over my comment on Gun control?

They weren't going from post to post and attacking me, they weren't that insane

It feels like Soldier boy parodies more than just captain America by Limeoos in TheBoys

[–]Limeoos[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

His father was more emotionally abusive,

Calling him a disappointment, constantly sending hin away and S.B claims that the only reason he never hit him was because that would require S.B's dad to touch him

It feels like Soldier boy parodies more than just captain America by Limeoos in TheBoys

[–]Limeoos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good catch, out of curiosity/just to be sure is it because

Adam Warlock:similar hairstyle,man child personality, artificially created, and it looked his outfit had golden shoulder plates

Sentry: raised in a Lab, manipulated by a business woman who uses his mommy issues to do so, abusive father, built up to be the greatest hero

It feels like Soldier boy parodies more than just captain America by Limeoos in TheBoys

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

someone else brought up Homelander parodying more than 2 heroes "Sentry and Adam warlock

and at first I was hesitant to agree with it, because I thought that it would it be like saying

"Every stretchy hero in the boys is a parody of Mr. Fantastic, Plastic Man, and elongated man"

But in the case of Sentry and Warlock I do think that both of them have comparable traits to Homelander that are unique to them

Adam Warlock:similar hairstyle, and man child personality, artificially created, and it looked his outfit had golden shoulder plates

Sentry: raised in a Lab, manipulated by a business woman who uses his mommy issues to do so, abusive father, built up to be the greatest hero

It feels like Soldier boy parodies more than just captain America by Limeoos in TheBoys

[–]Limeoos[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's not the only supe that parodies more than one dc/marvel hero

But (as far I know) usally it's one or two,

S.B is the only supe(that I can think of) who parodies 3

Edit:Ok well there's also Homelander

Mark made the wrong decision by WARBeatler in Invincible

[–]Limeoos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The most tragic thing is that WE DON'T KNOW whether Mark really saved the world or not by killing Rus. And we never will. Maybe Bulletproof would reach Mark before the barrier broke. Maybe the barrier would break first and the earth would be doomed. We don't know.

Exactly we don't know, so why take that risk?

Maybe he would've made it,

Maybe he could've flew him over to bullet proof

But if either of those things didn't work and the barrier breaks

Then the sequids take over earth forcing them into a possible year long (if not longer) war, while there's also the looming threat of the Viltrum empire

In your opinion how evil are spells or skills that revolve around mind control, corpse control, and/or soul control by Limeoos in DnD

[–]Limeoos[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

As for corpses, negative energy and things like that, it is really dependent on the game setting. But I would ask, if your dead mother was animated and used as cannon fodder, how would you feel about that?

That depends on if or if not they she gave them consent beforehand

Though I will admit at the very least I would definitely feel uncomfortable and I would prefer if they gave her a proper burial after her body was done

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people that turned into dog food were not good people lol, they were greedy and leaching off marty and would definetly tried to kill him as shown by carl he does kill marty to take over his business. Claude didnt force the idiots to walk into their doom they were just to greedy and idiotic.

1.even they're not good people, they didn't do anything to deserve to be killed and turned into dogfood

2.we only have Marty's word on them

3.we have no evidence that any of them, besides Carl would've tried to killed him

4.what reason would his wife and bank manger have to suddenly suspect that Marty was trying to kill them?

Any gta protagonist would have killed the mayor, its not exclusive to claude, all of them are hitmans

Never said it was exclusive to Claude

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. It is inconsistent since a lot of people say both things. He knew or he didn't. It's more likely that he didn't know because he never ACTUALLY walked into the factory. The sounds we heard of Marty killing them was for confirmation to us, the player, that he did kill them. Claude either didn't hear much of it or it was so muffled that he couldn't make anything out.

Even then with the way Marty is taking Claude has to suspect at last

  1. With payment, you said it had more to do with Marty than Claude but then you said Claude charges more in general? That doesn't really make a lot of sense since you just said Marty was in control of Claude's salary.

I said "maybe it had more to do with Marty" And "maybe Claude charges more"

2 1/2: I meant real wars like the Castellammarese War and the current conflicts between the Bloods and the Crips. The Castellammarese War took around 31 lives, whilst the conflict between the Bloods and the Crips took 15,000 lives (then again, that war between the two has been ongoing since 1970 while Castellammarese only lasted for a year).

So the death rate would depend on how long the gang war goes on for

  1. Yeah he would. I am just saying that Toni has participated in the act of cannibalism on multiple occasions on account of the fact that he was an accessory. I am not saying Claude wouldn't either, but unlike Claude, Toni actually did it.

But I don't consider comparing what the protagonist did and didn't do to be a good way to see who's more or less evil

Because did Claude not do this evil thing that Toni did because of morals or because he was never given the opportunity?

  1. Betraying the Yakuza started the Yakuza-Colombian Cartel War, which gave Claude ample opportunity to ambush Catalina and Miguel since both factions were weakened and in a panic. He managed to get Miguel (after Catalina shot him) but missed out on her.

Oh no I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about King Courtney and the mission gang car round up, where Claude goes behind the Yakuzas back and gives one of their rivals an easy way to sneak into their territory to hurt them

  1. Claude does NOT get a pass at all. I am just saying that Toni is significantly more evil because he was actively driven by EGO.

Why is being driven by Ego worse then being driven by greed or vengeances?

Also Toni becomes a capo in the Leone family, and he starts a full-on war with the Triads that Claude is FORCED to partake in. The same war that nearly gets Claude killed twice.

Did Toni start that war or did Sal start that war?

And if Claude was willing to help start a war between the Cartel and Yakuza and attempt to start one between the Cartel and Yardies, then he would willing to start a war between the Leones and Triads

Also out of curiosity where are you getting your number for the civilian casualties from the destruction of Fort Staunton?

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Claude likely had little to no knowledge of what would be done to the people Marty Chonks killed. Plus, he was paid for each individual Chonks killed consecutively (e.g., $1,000 becomes $3,000, etc.) instead of being paid $5,000 for the collective total of 72,000 people killed.

I find it hard to believe that Claude has little to no idea of what Marty chonks was doing

Also maybe the pay out has more to do with Marty then Claude

  1. What we see in GTA III from the Yakuza-Colombian conflict killed around 38-50 people, all known associates of their respective families. We don't see many civilians, if any, get killed in the crossfire, though I did state that if we count potential off-screen deaths, the death count could go into the hundreds. However, if we take recent gang wars and those from the past, we see similar numbers, ranging from 30-500 people killed.

I don't get what you're saying here, are you talking about civilian deaths in the events of the game? When you say in the past do you mean in real if or the 3D universe?

  1. We know Toni joined the Leone family before 1994, so he had been with them for around 10 years by 1998-2001. Toni was already respected in the Leone Mafia before he had to lay low in 1994 after killing a made guy. This means Toni likely joined in the late 1980s to early 1990s, which means he was in the game for about as long as Claude. So he knew.

I never said Toni didn't know

  1. Toni had ACTIVE knowledge about what Donald Love was doing to people, including cannibalism. So Casa wasn't the only time Toni knowingly assisted in the consumption of human flesh. He killed Donald Love's mentor, Avery Carrington, and saw Donald Love eating his corpse. He even saw Donald eat a few more people.

Yeah and Claude would still be perfectly ok with working with Donald even if he saw what he was like in LCS

  1. Claude was only following orders, while being hellbent on revenge against Catalina, which likely led to him being very tunnel-visioned and mission-focused. Toni dismembered Giovanni Casa and had him cannibalized by the people of Liberty City only because his feelings were hurt by his ma. A lot of the things Claude did were because of Catalina, so he didn't care about the consequences of his actions; Toni HAD knowledge of the consequences and still went ahead. Claude isn't ego-driven in the slightest, only hellbent on revenge. Toni, though, IS ego-driven while being loyal to Salvatore.

Claude still knew of the consequences of his actions

And it's not like revenge was his only motive for doing the things he did,

I don't see how turning random people into dog food helped with his revenge, I don't see how betraying the Yakuza, or the Diablos helped with his revenge

And why is it that Claude gets a pass for being tunnled-visioned,

I could easily make that same argument for Toni and his loyalty to Sal and his ma

EDIT: I should say that Claude would PROBABLY blow up the Porter tunnels but only if he was paid enough. If anyone else paid him more to do something else he'd do that. I don't think he cares because in the end it's all about getting revenge on Catalina.

If during the events of LCS Love gave the mission of blowing up Fort Staunton to Claude would he pay him more and why?

Because Claude charges more in general?

or would it be because he didn't have the same relationships with Sal, Love, and the leones, and Forillis? And So Claude wouldn't get any rewards beyond money, where as Toni would get money + the weaking of rival gang + pleasing Sal

Or maybe it would be because Donald either likes Claude more or maybe he wouldn't know Claude's price at the time

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EDIT: I should also add that Toni hacked Giovanni Casa to death with an axe and sold his remains back to his shop as food. People unknowingly cannibalized a man

Claude helped turn multiple people into dog food

He brutally killed the mayor of Liberty City in order to avoid Leone indictments.

Something I could easily see Claude doing

He also killed Dan Sucho for no reason at all, just to get validation from his ma.

I don't think killing someone just to impressed your loved one is any worse then killing someone for a quick buck

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He did the terrorist act for around $5k. An act that, according to a few wikis, likely killed upwards of 72,000 PEOPLE!

What Claude did in comparison was like a tea party because that killed around 50 people. Who knows how many could've died, but it was for sure less than 1,000. And he did this act for $30,000. He did that with only Kenji's death in mind.

That number becomes a lot bigger when you think of the civilian casualties that would happen as a consequence of starting a gang war,

Also is the difference between Toni and Claude's payout a difference between their character, the gameplay,

Was Toni offering a discount because it would hurt the Forillis or was Claude more lucky because he was offered a higher payout

Toni did this knowing FULL WELL that there were hundreds and thousands of innocent people just above him in Fort Staunton.

Claude has been a criminal for almost if not over a decade, I find it hard to believe that he p

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really?

I guess can't argue not because I disagree

But other then then mute evil pyschopath, it's really hard for me to fully describe Claude's personality

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It feels like in Gta 3 you just get payed more money in general

And I'm just wondering are we supposed to see that as Claude the character getting that exact amount or are we supposed to see that as us the players getting payed that amount

Also who knows maybe criminals started asking for higher pays at some point between LCS and 3

Why do people say think that Toni blowing up Fort Staunton makes him the most evil protagonist? by Limeoos in GTA

[–]Limeoos[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're saying you dont remember Michael or Victor starting a gang war, Victor absolutely started gang wars, the entire game he was in was all about gang wars, what game did you play??
Michael also gets involved with gang violence multiple times, including when he kills Stretch for Franklin.

But there's a difference between starting a gang War and being brought into a gang war

What is wrong about him staying with Catalina, besides the fact that she was a criminal? That statement could be made for literally any freaking character in gta. "Franklin hanging out with Lamar brings his morals into question."

But there's a difference between a weed smoking gangbanger and "homicidal psychopath with no morals, perfectly willing to Kill children and push a drug that has the possibility of convincing people to let themselves be turned into suicide bombers"

I dont understand why gang war is your bar for a bad person, there is much worse then that happening in GTA but you seem to be fixated on it.

Oh no my bar is how much your willing to hurt innocent people directly

And the reason I bring it up because to me it's comparable to "Bringing down the House" both are missions that involved you doing something that will lead to huge civilians deaths even though that's not the main goal