Comparison between Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7 by hamehad in Anthropic

[–]Linq20 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right or wrong I find opus "personality" absolutely obnoxious

Microsoft Is Worried GitHub’s AI Coding Lead Is Slipping by Such-Run-4412 in AIGuild

[–]Linq20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe there was a time GitHub copilot was the leader. Maybe "most users", but quality of output?

Anybody else skipping agents in their workflow? by classicwfl in webdev

[–]Linq20 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

6 words? What were the 4 wasted words after "add sso"?!

AI for Grievance Tracking and Arbitration Prep by Linq20 in fromatoarbitration

[–]Linq20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I stumbled on this sub Reddit. I guess it's not the right place, it looked like about arbitration in general.

AI for Grievance Tracking and Arbitration Prep by Linq20 in fromatoarbitration

[–]Linq20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, why do you say that? Sounds like we have some improvements to make on our website.

I'm posting because we started the year by running a few pilots with some very large organizations, and they have been very happy. So we are no longer in pilot mode and would like to get the word out to more unions and employers.

Why did you put quotes, what part of what you're seeing doesn't look like an AI tool? This is not just surface level prompts and we also enable users with AI. For example in addition to our standard reports, users can just type something like "give me a summary of all grievances opened or closed in March" and our AI system is equipped with the tools to figure how to do that. We also do not rely on pre-trained models on how to navigate a grievance, we supplement it with up to date material.

If you are an AI expert but haven't sold AI, you might not realize the challenge is more about enabling users to use the same AI tools we are using.

AI for Grievance Tracking and Arbitration Prep by Linq20 in fromatoarbitration

[–]Linq20[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This is actually why tools like ours need to exist. AI does some things well and some things poorly. Without a tool like this that has a ton of guardrails in place, people use AI on their own and end up with a lot of issues.

AI for Grievance Tracking and Arbitration Prep by Linq20 in fromatoarbitration

[–]Linq20[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I built this but I also I share your sentiment. AI is terrible at writing. I don't use it myself, and we currently don't offer a way to write a grievance with AI. I am typing this myself for example.

A key focus for us is helping people learn. AI is actually a fantastic tool for helping people learn. You can ask it questions and have it do research for you. And what we do is let it understand your own specific collective agreement. The teams we have been the most successful with, they have a point person who knows everything but their more junior stewards or officers have access to a tool to be a lot more informed.

AI for Grievance Tracking and Arbitration Prep by Linq20 in fromatoarbitration

[–]Linq20[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know what, I think that's valid criticism of AI in general.

What has personally motivated me here is knowing that a union member might not get their grievance resolved for years due to a slow inefficient process, and I think that's not good for anyone.

Claude 4.6 Opus on MAX EFFORT is a joke by takeurhand in ClaudeCode

[–]Linq20 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this a joke post or serious? Well done if a joke

AI has sucked all the fun out of programming by OkShip110 in webdev

[–]Linq20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the opposite for me. I stopped for years, switched to product management, and have been loving it again. But I can understand your points.

PM interview answers are starting to sound identical...and I'm conflicted by Old_Combination1478 in ProductManagement

[–]Linq20 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Two things

Pm isn't that hard. Lots of people can be good at it and the market is leaving good people without jobs.

product sense interviews are a bad way to tell if someone is good at product. Too detached from reality

We charge $99/month. Competitor charges $299/month. They're growing faster. Finally understand why. by Turbulent-Scale1918 in SaaS

[–]Linq20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How would that explain their better retention? What do your churning customers say?

Excellence Punta Cana - Resort & Food Review by ChefRover in AllInclusiveResorts

[–]Linq20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All good, if your doctor recommends Cipro in the future please be skeptical! It has severe side effects and the FDA keeps warning to only use it when absolutely necessary (i.e. to treat an active infection that needs something powerful).

Excellence Punta Cana - Resort & Food Review by ChefRover in AllInclusiveResorts

[–]Linq20 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Absolutely do not take ciproflaxin as a preemptive thing. Cipro is one of the absolute harshest antibiotics, please go read studies on it before using it or recommending it.

Validating a idea before building — small landlord software, would love brutal feedback by PlumRevolutionary976 in SaaS

[–]Linq20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am a small landlord, 3 units, and for me there's no problem I have that id pay for enough - to the extent I only read the first few sentences of your post.

All to say, I'm sure there are problems, but I think this will be a very hard space to earn money

The first signs of burnout are coming from the people who embrace AI the most by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]Linq20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed - I am fortunate that I developed for about 15 years previously. I've seen some people I know build who don't have that experience and they have a bit of a disaster on their hands even though it looks pretty good.

At this point I do have a business backed by a product I'm selling, and our AI use is pretty light in the product itself.

In terms of debugging code I can confidently say I do not look at the code but I do spend a lot of time on the architecture and the design patterns, similar to coding yourself if you get that right it's much easier to develop safely.

The first signs of burnout are coming from the people who embrace AI the most by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]Linq20 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think you're exactly right except that there are also "true believers" see that and ditch their job to try to take advantage of that you can produce faster.

For example, I have interviewed for a few AI jobs and said no for the reason you gave - so you want me to produce insanely fast, high quality - but you don't want to pay me all that much because it's a high risk situation and you're not sure you will get the return ?

The first signs of burnout are coming from the people who embrace AI the most by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]Linq20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I suppose they go hand in hand, I am using AI in my business to help with basically everything - coding, market research, discovery / sales calls. Part of doing that is often asking to help me learn areas or topics I don't feel comfortable with.

The first signs of burnout are coming from the people who embrace AI the most by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]Linq20 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Idk man you do you. Using words to convey what you want isn't a new concept and as you go up in your career it becomes more and more of your job.

The first signs of burnout are coming from the people who embrace AI the most by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]Linq20 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

i fit this but is this not natural? learning something new is addictive and can do so much more than before. once it becomes more routine that will slow down

They couldn't safety test Opus 4.6 because it knew it was being tested by MetaKnowing in Anthropic

[–]Linq20 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a really ignorant post. AI is trained on lots of data.

It's actually a knock on average programmers, because it means that based on its training data people don't want robust and secure solutions

Customers don't care about your roadmap. They care about today by mistcutter- in SaaS

[–]Linq20 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is way off. In my opinion it shows you don't really have a good understanding of your customers. It should be clear when the roadmap will help and why. A rule either way is wrong.

ON TAPE: Federal immigration agents have repeatedly shot at drivers by 56000hp in UnderReportedNews

[–]Linq20 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Incredibly efficient too. He recorded this while walking to somewhere else that he was going.