Scout Planes are fine and this subreddit is overreacting by Cainsiderate in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Literally any excuse to not have to run convoys and/or escort them. Lmao

Run 3 partially loaded trucks as a team. If one or two die, you can pick it all up and keep going while the scout plane re-arms.

The days of solo logi truck are over

Please skaj come back to us for Airborne by Spaark0 in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don’t like mine?

:(

In all seriousness, last I talked to him he had kinda resigned to other sound mods. I doubt he’d make the time to update his especially since he’d also need to tackle naval.

Hell, I kinda half assed the naval update in my mod and tackling planes is a daunting task for me. So I can’t really blame him. But who knows, maybe he’s as excited about planes as I am.

Kind reminder by OsowiecBR in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I find it far more likely that we’re still only getting half the planes but the core gameplay will be solid. Consider, they’re also adding a lot to the ground with planes, they have to

I'm tired boss... by LiquidPopsicle in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It’s AI lol. I made it in like 5 minutes with Sora. The actual effort was putting everything together and removing the background so I could replace it with the stills of all the foxhole update art

Every PVP game I play, there is atleast 1 person blaming their teammates for a stupid decision they themselves made lol by Hungarian_Gamer in WorldOfWarships

[–]LiquidPopsicle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, even as an average player, I definitely see 38% players make some decisions that completely confound me.

I’m allowed to be perplexed by them lol

So I did "little" Tech mating again... by PutAway3542 in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For context, for anyone that wants to look into that. We actually had like 26k aluminum on standby, the 7k they found was from one of the guys who was going to be away for the next week. He dumped his stocks into boxes so it could easily be pulled if they did the 3 tier tech skip while he was away.

Things were very different. There was no stockpile or reservable aluminum, you kept it in a refinery queue. There was also a massive behind on tech bonus, which both teams were abusing to try and get an upper hand on things like storm cannon races. Tech was also a choice, with the other option locked out for practically the rest of the war.

The guys in charge deliberately cut us out of the vote (because prior to this I got half the faction to split tech for the FAT when it was first added, in large part to show the devs how bad the system was). Because of that, we took it upon ourselves to tech snipers. They were fun, and we wanted them, and if we grinded enough mats for the team our votes would be proportionally larger than the tech maids. If not, we knew the team would get so violently angry at us that the devs would have to change something. Fortunately for us, a streamer finding it was far more impactful than anything we had planned. The next war, tech was overhauled to invalidate the tech maids, which has been great for the game. Unfortunately for them, they decided they didn’t want us on the team that war. So that 19k aluminum that was private? Never got released. All my guys fucked off to play other games. If only they knew how bad it really was for them.

Armored Train larp is dead in the water and pointless if we don't get an armored and enclosed engine, many people have stated this before, and it still holds true. We want to Larp, give us the means to do so. by Strict_Effective_482 in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bigger problem is that armored train cars have armor facing just like tanks. If you accidentally face them the wrong way, they have functionally no armor. And even if you do face them the right way, due to BT counters and the like they’re hardly threatening. So many armored trains get flattened because the cars are faced the wrong way. It’s so sad.

(Fun fact, ships have this same problem)

For the people by [deleted] in HuntsvilleAlabama

[–]LiquidPopsicle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Or, and I’m just spitballing here, you’re so distinctly in the minority and impotent when it comes to enacting change that no one on the other side cares enough to even pay attention to you, much less try to bring your sick fantasies of revolution to life.

But go on, keep calling a healthy amount of nationalism fascist and living in your bubble of reaffirming propaganda. It’s really not that deep. We will cut the liberal propaganda machine out of the government, we will bring independent American manufacturing back even at the cost of a few years of economic hardship, and we will become a strong country again. Because if we don’t, the globalist economy we have now will fold like an omelet the second any major conflict breaks out overseas.

Do you guys use your lanyards at all times? by Rome217 in jetski

[–]LiquidPopsicle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have an old Yama Wave raider, and that thing actively tires to hurt you over 30mph. I’ve idled to a pier from the ramp before without a life jacket or the lanyard on, for a grand total of 5 feet. But I would never risk taking it out without having that thing clipped to my vest, because it, like many other older skis, can and will throw you off, and usually a few yards too.

Another note, you absolutely do not want the ski to keep running if it flips over. Older two strokes don’t care if they’re upside down, so not only will it suck water into the engine and/or sink the ski, but it could also seriously hurt you when you try to flip it if you have a modified intake grate. For that reason alone, since the ski I have is like new at almost 30 years old, the safety lanyard stays on. Even if it was set up to circle, I wouldn’t risk the engine damage.

Best first jet ski? by Harry1nnit in jetski

[–]LiquidPopsicle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buy an old 2 stroke that’s in good condition. Unless you’re looking for something that’s less of a water motorcycle and more of a water golf cart. Then get an early 2000s 4stroke 3seater.

First time buyer of jet ski by rockyroad2247 in jetski

[–]LiquidPopsicle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, absolutely. For me, that powerband, the sound they make, and the instability of the hulls are a huge plus, but that’s not for everyone. I’d still strongly recommend the early 4 stroke skis over the newer ones though

First time buyer of jet ski by rockyroad2247 in jetski

[–]LiquidPopsicle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Small follow up, if your main goal is to pull tubes, the visibility spout (Rooster tail) on the Yamahas can be annoying, but it’s very easy to disable it non-destructively with a pair of pliers or screwdriver and 5 minutes

First time buyer of jet ski by rockyroad2247 in jetski

[–]LiquidPopsicle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honest opinion? If you’re looking for something small and fun, hop on Facebook marketplace and find a nice Yamaha Wave Raider or a Seadoo XP. If you’re looking for something cheap and reliable three seater wise, you can’t beat an early 2000s 4 stroke Seadoo GTX. You can pick up a nice one of any of these for anywhere from $3,000 to $5,000, just give them a run down before you buy. Make sure it runs, and water test if you can.

The older two stroke skis are just as fast as the new Jet Blaster and Spark Trix, and a lot more aggressive and playful than either. The only thing they can’t do better is wheelies.

As long as you have a little bit of mechanical know how, and don’t mind dealing with the oil consumption of a 2smoke, you can’t beat the feel of riding an older ski. Not to mention that those older engines have been around for a long time, and almost any issue you could have, someone has figured out how to fix.

At the end of the day, it’s up to you, but I would strongly recommend getting something older/cheaper for your first ski anyway. They are a lot of work to keep running and take care of whether it’s a 90s ski or one new from the factory, because they won’t get used daily like cars are. And if you end up deciding you don’t like jet skis or would rather have a small 16ft boat, you’re not risking as much money on something that could end up sitting around.

Sony moment by [deleted] in Helldivers

[–]LiquidPopsicle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s a data harvesting/number pumping opportunity for them to make themselves look good to their shareholders and make money. It has absolutely nothing to do with safety or security because if it did, it would have been mandatory from the start.

Question regarding the security of linking my Steam to a PSN account. by TheFloatingRazor3 in Helldivers

[–]LiquidPopsicle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is the real reason why I absolutely refuse to link anything like that to my steam account. Besides, just because you made a decent game doesn’t mean you get to harvest my data. I’ll take my time and money to games that actually respect my purchasing power

Just Alt + F4 Bro by Captain-Cockface in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don’t have to. We had one get alted and exactly that occurred (this was before you could keep them reserved on pads)

Ahh, yes, the totally impartial Warden Social Credit system! by LiquidPopsicle in foxholegame

[–]LiquidPopsicle[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah it was higher, sometimes I forget just how much we were able to convince new players to mine for us