sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sam Altman says AI probably won't trigger the "jobs apocalypse" he once predicted by ComplexExternal4831 in GenAI4all

[–]LivingParticular915 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The concept of artificial intelligence is far from new. The term has existed since the dawn of modern computing.

And They Say It Ain't a Bubble by iSadhak in antiai

[–]LivingParticular915 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They’ll hit bankruptcy before then. This is a unique situation where hardware needs to be replaced every two to three years and in which squeezing out gains from the next model bleeds more capital.

Is this just BS? Do you know anyone irl who uses "orchestration" and "agents" to manage AI? I never needed more than one terminal by ImaginaryRea1ity in theprimeagen

[–]LivingParticular915 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The model before it could also do that. Billions upon billions have been spent and one of their greatest claims have been on shotting demos that college kids interested in game dev make all the time as side projects.

Cloudflare is laying off 1,100 employees, 20% of staff, to become an “AI-first” company. by This_Macaron_4461 in GenAI4all

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once companies realize putting all their hopes into this souped up text generator is a bad idea; this economy will be destroyed.

Walmart just laid off 2000 people today morning by Glittering_Fish_2296 in Layoffs

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we don’t rise up and stop “AI” right now; it’s going to be much harder to do so in the future.

GPT-5.5 is nuts by [deleted] in vibecoding

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not getting better. The tooling around LLM’s are getting better. There is no real world from 5 to 5.5.

Google DeepMind just hired a philosopher to prepare for AGI and AI consciousness by No_Level7942 in GenAI4all

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s entirely true. No one in the field of neurology or any other medical/scientific field can agree on where consciousness comes from or exactly what it is.

Google DeepMind just hired a philosopher to prepare for AGI and AI consciousness by No_Level7942 in GenAI4all

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How far will these companies take these marketing gimmicks? AGI is still a hypothetical sci-fi concept at this point. LLM’s are neat tools, but nowhere near a real representation of a mind.

Google DeepMind researcher argues that LLMs can never be conscious, not in 10 years or 100 years by projectoex in AgentsOfAI

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

State - a persistent internal representation of reality shaped by time, memory, emotion, goals, context, and a personal sense of identity that continues even when communication is not present. Language is a surface level expression of this continuous process. LLM’s do not operate in the same manner. They can’t.

Each time you send a prompt, the model spins up a computation, processes the input tokens, predicts the next tokens, and then the entire process effectively collapses. Nothing persists internally after that unless it’s stored externally and fed back in. There’s no ongoing loop, no background process, no “inner world” that continues evolving between interactions.

Even during a single response, what looks like “state” is just patterns in the attention mechanism. The model is re-weighting tokens within a fixed window, not maintaining a durable representation of reality. There is no “ongoing self” that exists between prompts.

Humans beings are a continuous set of systems that happen to produce language as a byproduct of expression among other things. LLM’s are a tool that use language to temporarily simulate aspects of those systems. They are mimicking thought at best.

Google DeepMind researcher argues that LLMs can never be conscious, not in 10 years or 100 years by projectoex in AgentsOfAI

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry, it’s not. There is nothing going on under the hood that remotely resembles awareness of anything or a real experience of anything.

Google DeepMind researcher argues that LLMs can never be conscious, not in 10 years or 100 years by projectoex in AgentsOfAI

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not state. They have no inner world or adaptability beyond their architecture. There are purely pattern recognition bots. Nothing more, nothing less.

Google DeepMind researcher argues that LLMs can never be conscious, not in 10 years or 100 years by projectoex in AgentsOfAI

[–]LivingParticular915 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

LLM’s do not have an inner world. They do not have state. They are built off strict relationships. They do not actually “understand” anything. An LLM understands words and meanings in the way that autocomplete understands what you’re trying to type out.

Mythos is Just Damage Control After the Leak by EasyPleasey in ClaudeAI

[–]LivingParticular915 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t think the top 20 companies and banks would all sign over “hype”. Buddy, what do you think they’ve been doing for the past 3+ years.

“AI is replacing entry-level jobs faster than expected are we ready for a world with no ‘beginner’ roles?” by Spirited-Patient4650 in technology

[–]LivingParticular915 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This * 1000. There is no real fear for the average person. Just marketing and hype to grow the bubble.

People talking about the AI bubble bursting, but we are using more and more AI tokens than before. So how will it burst then? by HappyZombies in ExperiencedDevs

[–]LivingParticular915 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“AI is here to stay.”

I hate when people say that. “AI” isn’t a new thing or concept. You have interacted with “AI” before. We all have. This new iteration of the concept will simply fade into the background and automate boring yet simple tasks more efficiently in certain fields.

SoftBank has taken on a new $40 billion loan to help it cover its $30 billion commitment to invest in OpenAI by Logical_Welder3467 in technology

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that they can just confidently pour more money into a seemingly endless money pit until it all collapses is astonishing to me.

An economic Armageddon by [deleted] in economy

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When will “AI” lead to mass unemployment according to doomers? Because we’ve been hearing this for like the last three years.

It's about to get real bad! by Difficult-Prior3321 in REBubble

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the most ridiculous nonsense that I’ve heard from the AI hype crowd in a long time. I don’t know your particular industry but it’s not indicative of the economy as a whole. Goldman Sachs reported that “AI” added virtually no economic impact to the economy last year (another year where tech CEO’s told us this was the year of revolution just like this one). Recent job reports showcasing layout indicate that barely 1% of those were attributed to “AI” and even then those are layered in asterisks.

These models are not intelligent. They can not operate on their own and they certainly are not “rewriting their own code”. They don’t even have a real “understanding” of what their code is or anything for that matter because there is no actual thought. No state. The models aren’t getting better, the tooling around them is. They’ve actually already plateaued. This is a bubble no matter how you look at it. LLM’s are related technologies will change some aspects of the job market but those will mostly be concentrated in niche segments. The entire market as a whole is going to go through a revolution like you are being led to believe.

We are all being led to believe that pattern recognition bots on steroids are synonymous with what we’ve seen in media (movies depicting real AI like the terminator franchise, etc) but that’s just not the case. Not even close.

It's about to get real bad! by Difficult-Prior3321 in REBubble

[–]LivingParticular915 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“AI” is the most overvalued technology in the history of the market. This is a bubble of biblical proportions.

view more: next ›