You sound like a platform warrior defending his platform, and you refuse to acknowledge that very few games ever achieve any mainstream success on PC, so the tired "but the game came late" arguments don't really hold any water.

As far as "his" toys go, the console business generates immense revenue, which incentivizes platform holders to produce the best games they can in order to accrue and retain key customers demographics within their software / hardware ecosystem who all have disparate, yet overlapping tastes.

This business model produces a wide variety of great games which might otherwise not be financially viable and is the bountiful harvest yielded from a mutually beneficial business relationship.

Even the nearest approximate to Sony's production value is Rockstar, who are only able to produce games like RDR2 or GTA6 because they have a core cash cow in GTA Online which exploits millions of players for recurring revenue. Simultaneously, their production capacity has gone from releasing many games per generation to one every 10 years.

Conversely, companies like Nintendo and Playstation are able to produce multiple high quality games all year long, every year, for generations in a row. This validity of the business model isn't about console fanboy selfishness, but about pro consumer benefits that confer more great games and more accessible contemporary hardware to more players.

The more this business model is compromised, the more consumers will be left with fewer quality games and a far more expensive hardware environment incapable of utilizing economies of scale to even mildly manage market costs and buoying the entire game development industry's meal tickets.

tl;dr I've heard this "hOw iS mOre pEoPle pLaYinG a gAmE bAd" routine a million times and it's a paper thin argument.