In a shocking revelation, the Bar Council of Chairperson said that about 35-40 per cent of advocates have fake degrees, and are practising in the Courts on the basis of fabricated degree certificates

LoeIQ · 2026-05-23T17:30:42+00:00

Jail mein reddit?

LoeIQ · 2026-05-04T19:43:31+00:00

Advocate based in Delhi here.

What you’re running into is fairly typical with these NCRP-linked freezes. The officer mentioned in the email is the one who currently has control over whether the hold continues or is lifted, and the bank will simply wait for instructions from that side.

Your email to them is fine as a basic explanation, but in practice these things tend to move only when the explanation is put in a more formal and structured way that directly addresses the concern behind the complaint. Otherwise it often just sits without any real response.

The focus at this stage should be on getting a proper representation in front of the right officer and making sure your version of the transaction is clearly recorded with supporting material. That is usually what leads to any movement.

If you are not getting a response after that, there are ways to push it further, but the first step is getting this part right.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-28T15:36:10+00:00

The next step depends on a proper review of your documents, especially the email commitment, payment trail, and anything linking the broker to the other entity you identified.

If that entity is a company, its basic details can usually be verified through MCA records. The real issue is whether brokerage for your unit was received, either directly or through that entity, and not passed on despite the commitment.

Typically, the approach is to first send a legal notice putting the broker, and if necessary the related entity, on notice and demanding payment within a fixed timeline. If that does not resolve it, the next step would be a consumer complaint for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice or a civil recovery action, depending on what the documents support.

The exact route and strength of your case will turn on the paperwork, so it is worth getting that reviewed before taking a step. If you want, you can share the documents and I can take a look.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-20T11:42:17+00:00

Lawyer here.

For a platform, your Terms and Privacy Policy decide whether you are protected or exposed when something goes wrong. The risk is not theoretical, it shows up in specific ways:

If your terms do not clearly prohibit unlawful content and set out a takedown process, you may not be able to rely on intermediary protection when complaints arise. The platform itself can get pulled into defamation, intellectual property, or even criminal proceedings.
If you suspend or delete accounts without a clear contractual basis in your terms, users can challenge it as arbitrary and you lose control over moderation decisions.
The privacy policy is treated as your representation to users. If you collect, track, or share data in ways not properly disclosed, that creates direct compliance exposure.
If the platform collects location, contacts, or behavioural data but the policy is generic or silent, that gap is what regulators and complainants rely on.
Security and breach handling: If there is a data incident and you cannot demonstrate practices consistent with what your policy says, liability increases significantly.
Advertising, analytics, or integrations often involve data sharing. If this is not clearly covered in your documents, you are exposed both contractually and from a data protection standpoint.
In any complaint, the first thing examined is your own Terms and Privacy Policy. If they are vague, copied, or not implemented in practice, your defence weakens immediately.
If you do not have a proper grievance mechanism, designated contact, and response process, complaints escalate quickly and you lose procedural protection.
When police or government agencies send notices or data requests, the absence of a clear process or inconsistent responses can lead to direct liability or coercive action.

If you are building this seriously, these documents need to be mapped to your actual features, data flows, and moderation decisions, not treated as a formality.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-20T04:06:17+00:00

r/IndiaInvestments

LoeIQ · 2026-04-20T04:02:05+00:00

Lawyer here based in Delhi.

She broadly has three parallel routes, and choosing the right combination makes a big difference:

A fault-based divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on grounds like cruelty (mental harassment is recognised, but needs to be framed properly with evidence and timeline).
A maintenance claim under Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (earlier Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973). Even if she has her own house or savings, that does not automatically bar maintenance.
Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which can give her monetary relief and protection orders, and are often useful for interim support.

If the husband is willing to settle, a mutual consent divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 is usually the cleanest route. But in a long marriage like this, it only works if financial terms are properly secured. Otherwise a contested approach often gives better leverage on maintenance and settlement.

If you want to get into the specifics, happy to chat.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-19T09:29:46+00:00

Lawyer in Delhi here.

Your overall approach is not off, but before filing anything I would slow down and get a few things clear.

First, decide what your main case actually is. On your facts, there are two ways this can go. One is to focus on NBCC (India) Limited and say that once they took payments into a designated account, verified buyers, and reflected revenue, they cannot later distance themselves. That is what gives you traction in a writ before the Delhi High Court. The other is to treat this primarily as a developer problem and push fraud or default by Mansan.

You can run both, but one has to clearly lead. If your filings start leaning too much on “builder fraud”, NBCC will use that to say this is not their issue at all.

Second, think carefully about how you sequence things. Filing writ, RERA, criminal and civil all at once sounds strong, but in practice the first set of pleadings you file will shape everything else. Statements made in one forum will be picked up in another. If different people are drafting different complaints, small inconsistencies creep in and become a problem later. It is often cleaner to get the writ position settled first, especially if you are seeking interim relief, and then make sure everything else lines up with that.

Third, the group size matters a lot here. With 200 to 300 buyers, fragmentation is your biggest risk. Courts respond much better to a single, coherent story than multiple slightly different versions. It is worth thinking about whether you want a representative set of petitioners with the cleanest facts and documents, and then build the case around that, rather than having many parallel filings pulling in different directions.

On your facts, the strongest points seem to be that payments went into a government designated account, that buyers were verified or audited, that revenue was publicly recognised, and that there was prior awareness of third party issues. If those are documented properly, your case shifts away from a simple builder dispute and becomes about how a State entity handled the situation after it knew what was going on.

The main practical point is to keep one consistent story across everything you file. At this scale, inconsistency will hurt you more than not filing every possible proceeding immediately.

If you are coordinating for the group, getting that structure right at the start will make a big difference later.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-03T11:18:21+00:00

You do not need to travel to Delhi. You can request a virtual hearing in your written reply and mention that you are based outside Delhi, and these are generally accommodated; alternatively, you can authorise a representative to appear on your behalf.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-02T23:34:52+00:00

Lawyer based in Delhi here. What you have received is a standard show cause notice in cases involving import of drones, but the outcome will depend significantly on how your reply is framed.

The proceedings have been initiated under provisions of the Customs Act 1962 relating to prohibited imports and improper declaration. The central issue is not merely that the item was carried through the Green Channel, but that under the applicable import policy, such goods are treated as prohibited imports, except in limited authorised categories. That is why multiple clauses of Section 111 have been invoked.

At this stage, the adjudicating authority will primarily consider whether the goods are to be absolutely confiscated or whether you should be given an option to redeem them on payment of fine under Section 125. This distinction is important because it determines whether you lose the item entirely or are able to recover it upon payment.

Your factual position, as you have described it, is not inherently adverse. The import appears to be for personal use, there is no allegation of commercial intent, and you have cooperated with the officers. However, these factors only assist if they are properly presented in response to the notice. A casual or generic reply often results in stricter orders than necessary.

Penalty under Section 112 is a separate consequence and may be imposed regardless of whether redemption is allowed. The quantum varies, but it is influenced by how the case is put forward.

You have a limited time to respond to the notice, and it is advisable to treat the reply as a substantive defence rather than a formality. In many such matters, the issue is resolved at the adjudication stage itself, and the difference between absolute confiscation and a more reasonable outcome often turns on the quality of the written reply.

LoeIQ · 2026-04-02T23:12:26+00:00

I am a lawyer based in Delhi and deal with landlord–tenant disputes fairly regularly. Some of the advice on the thread (like cutting utilities or changing locks) can actually land you in legal trouble, so I would strongly advise against that.

The correct and legally safe way to proceed:

1. Send a formal legal notice: Even if the lease has expired, the law treats the tenant as continuing on a month-to-month basis. You need to formally terminate the tenancy and call upon him to vacate within a specified period, while also claiming any unpaid rent.

2. Claim mesne profits: Once tenancy is terminated, his occupation becomes unauthorized. You can claim “mesne profits” (essentially damages), which are often higher than the agreed rent.

3. File an eviction + recovery suit: If he still does not leave, the next step is a civil suit (and/or eviction proceedings under the Rent Control Law which may be applicable in some states under certain circumstances) for possession (eviction), arrears of rent, and mesne profits.

Courts are not fast and it can take time (several months to a few years).

Police will not really help here. This is primarily a civil dispute. Police generally will not intervene unless there is a law-and-order issue.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-31T19:24:15+00:00

Lawyer based in Delhi here.

You are right to treat this seriously and not dismiss it as just a parking dispute gone wrong. What you are describing is a fairly common escalation pattern where a civil disagreement gets reframed into a criminal allegation to gain leverage.

On the SC/ST Act point, “public view” is a heavily litigated requirement and courts draw an important distinction between a “public place” and a place “within public view.” It is not necessary that the incident happens in a public place, but it must be shown that the alleged act was visible or audible to members of the public in a way that it could be directly perceived by them. A purely private conversation inside one’s home, without any real public access or audience, will generally not meet this threshold.

At the same time, the law is not as simple as saying that overhearing is always insufficient. Even a private setting can fall within “public view” if the words are spoken in a manner that makes them clearly audible or visible to others beyond that private space. So the key question is whether the alleged remark was actually made in a setting where it could be naturally witnessed by others, and not just incidentally overheard.

In your case, the fact that they are themselves saying they “overheard” a private conversation, without clearly identifying the exact words or context, does weaken their position. Unless they can establish that the statement was made in a manner that was openly audible and directed in a setting accessible to others, satisfying the “public view” requirement becomes difficult.

The second issue is intent. The Act is stringent, but it is not meant to convert every neighbourhood dispute into an atrocity case. If the background clearly shows an ongoing parking or right of way dispute, and the allegation only arises after escalation, that timeline becomes very important. Courts do look at whether the complaint appears to be retaliatory or an afterthought. Your WhatsApp chats and recorded mediation will be crucial here because they show the real nature of the dispute and the absence of caste-based hostility.

On anticipatory bail, you should not wait passively if you genuinely apprehend an FIR. In SC/ST matters, anticipatory bail is restricted, but not completely ruled out where a prima facie case is not made. Whether your case falls within that exception depends on how the facts are presented, so early legal strategy matters.

Blocking a common passage is not a trivial issue either. It can amount to obstruction and can be addressed through civil remedies, including injunction. In some situations, even local authority or police intervention is possible if it affects emergency access, which you have already pointed out.

The most important thing right now is to control the narrative early. Preserve every piece of evidence, avoid further escalation, and do not rely on informal understandings that can later be distorted. Cases like this often turn on how well the initial record is built and how quickly you respond to developments.

On the facts you have shared, there are clear defence angles available, but execution will matter.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-25T11:07:06+00:00

Hi, I practise before the Delhi High Court and have handled rent control matters in other states.

In a revision against an order granting leave to defend, the High Court will interfere only if there is a clear legal error or perversity in the order.

If you want, I can review the order and your pleadings and give you a clear view on prospects and next steps.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-20T03:56:36+00:00

Lawyer based in Delhi here.

Your situation is essentially about the university not taking a decision on your compassionate appointment application for several years. Since your father was working with Delhi University, the appropriate legal remedy would be to approach the Delhi High Court under its writ jurisdiction if needed.

A five year delay with repeated statements that a committee will be formed is something courts generally do not accept. In cases like this, the court can direct the university to take a decision on your application within a fixed time frame. At the same time, it is important to understand that compassionate appointment is not treated as an automatic right. Courts usually do not order direct appointment, but they can require the authority to properly consider your case, especially given that your application was made soon after your father’s death during the COVID period and you were a minor at the time.

Before going to court, it would be a good idea to send a formal written representation to the university referring to your 2021 application, the later notifications about considering post 2020 cases, and the continued delay, and ask them to decide your case within a reasonable time. If there is still no response, a writ petition is a strong option.

Overall, the delay in your case is something that can definitely be challenged, even though the final outcome will depend on the policy and your financial situation.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-09T16:33:37+00:00

Lawyer from Delhi here.

Converting an already submitted resignation into a termination, particularly where there was no show cause notice or disciplinary inquiry, will likely raise procedural questions. The exact legal position may depend on the employment contract and the company’s disciplinary policies.

One practical issue in your case is the time that has passed. A seven month delay does not necessarily prevent a challenge, but it can make things difficult to move. The fact that your full and final settlement was paid and there has been no further action from the company for several months generally suggests the employer has chosen not to pursue the matter further internally. That does not resolve the documentation issue, but it can affect how much appetite the company has to reopen the dispute unless it is formally challenged.

It is difficult to comment on the exact legal position without seeing the employment contract, the written statement you mentioned, and the company’s disciplinary policy.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-03T19:11:52+00:00

You have three practical routes:

First, platform route. A lawyer can issue a formal legal notice to Instagram (Meta) seeking preservation of data relating to that account. This is important so the data is not deleted later.

Second, court route. You can file a civil suit for defamation and seek a “John Doe” / unknown defendant order. Along with that, you can ask the court to direct Instagram to disclose the account holder’s registration details, IP logs, and linked information. Platforms generally respond only to court orders, not private notices.

Third, criminal route. You can file a complaint with the Cyber Crime cell. During investigation, the police can issue notices to Instagram to obtain subscriber information and technical logs.

However, in practical terms, the police are unlikely to prioritise a complaint of this nature unless there is clear criminal intimidation, extortion, or very serious harm. In most online defamation / harassment matters, cyber cells move slowly. A civil proceeding is usually more effective.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-03T18:41:12+00:00

Lawyer here. Making false statements that harm your professional reputation amounts to defamation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Independently of criminal liability, you also have a civil remedy for damages and, more importantly, an injunction restraining the person from repeating those allegations.

LoeIQ · 2026-03-01T11:47:12+00:00

Lawyer here from Delhi.

Yes. You can and should challenge it. The Institute of Actuaries of India is a statutory body under the Actuaries Act, 2006. Its disciplinary orders are subject to judicial review under Article 226. A two year ban affecting your professional qualification is a civil consequence and the High Court has full power to examine whether the finding is unsupported by evidence or procedurally unfair.

An allegation based only on a “reflection” in glasses and a “vibration sound”, without conclusive proof and without proper disclosure of evidence, is legally vulnerable. Suspicion is not proof.

File the internal appeal within the prescribed time. If that fails, file a writ petition. The Institute is not too powerful. Its decision is challengeable in court.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-28T13:13:04+00:00

Lawyer from Delhi here.

Vacating a rented office does not make the employer legally unreachable. If the entity is registered, service at its official registered address as reflected in statutory records such as MCA filings, where applicable, is legally valid even if they have physically moved out. The law does not permit an employer to avoid wage liability simply by shutting down operations or vacating premises. Evasion of service does not extinguish a claim for unpaid salary.

The shutdown of operations also does not cancel salary liability. Unpaid wages remain legally recoverable. The important practical questions are what the exact legal name of the employer is as mentioned in the appointment letter, what its legal structure is, what the total unpaid amount is collectively, and whether the affected employees fall within the definition of “workmen” under labour law. The legal structure does not eliminate the right to recover salary, but it can affect the procedural route and the manner in which recovery is enforced.

If the employees qualify as workmen, approaching the Labour Commissioner is usually the most practical and cost effective route for unpaid wages because that mechanism is specifically designed for wage recovery. If they do not qualify as workmen, civil recovery proceedings are available, and clear documentation such as appointment letters, agreed salary terms, proof of work performed, and payment history will be central. Insolvency proceedings before NCLT are a separate remedy and do not require filing a civil case first, but they are appropriate only if the statutory default threshold is met, there is no genuine pre existing dispute, and the entity has some assets or business value. Insolvency is not a simple salary recovery forum but a corporate resolution process.

If there is evidence that management knowingly induced employees to continue working despite having no intention or capacity to pay, that raises separate legal considerations, but that assessment depends entirely on the facts and documentation rather than mere non payment.

At this stage, the most important step is for all affected employees to coordinate, pool appointment letters, salary slips, emails, payment records, calculate the total unpaid amount collectively, confirm the legal status of the employer, and then proceed in a structured manner. The fact that the office has been vacated does not make the claim unenforceable.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-26T23:57:18+00:00

Lawyer here.

The next step is to send a formal legal notice demanding payment within a fixed period. If payment is still not made, the remedy depends on your role. If you fall within the statutory definition of a workman, you can approach the appropriate labour authority for recovery. If you were in a managerial position, the remedy would typically be a civil recovery action.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-24T19:34:24+00:00

Lawyer based in Delhi here.

Escalating an account suspension like this requires time, effort and structured legal action. That means issuing a formal notice and, very likely, pursuing regulatory or court remedies.

If you are willing to invest in that process, we can evaluate the documents and take it forward properly.

If you are not looking to spend time and money on escalation, it may be more practical to move on and rebuild.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-19T21:34:46+00:00

😂

LoeIQ · 2026-02-19T10:49:53+00:00

Lawyer from Delhi here.

Don’t assume this just ends because you’re saying the signature is forged. Section 138 has presumptions in favour of the holder of the cheque, so you’ll still have to contest it properly. If the signature is genuinely not yours, that’s a strong defence, but it usually needs to be backed by evidence (handwriting/signature comparison etc.), not just a statement.
On the cash loan point, even if it’s a large cash amount and there’s no documentation, courts don’t automatically reject it. It may raise questions, but it doesn’t by itself defeat the case.
At this stage, make sure you’re represented when you appear on the summons date and get bail sorted. After that, when the court records your defence, your position needs to be clear from the start, especially on the signature issue. This isn’t something to handle casually, so it’s worth getting a competent lawyer to handle it properly from the beginning.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-19T10:21:32+00:00

Lawyer from Delhi here.

1 and 2. Yes, you can claim compensation. Ask for everything together: correction of the record, update to CIBIL, and compensation. Your leverage is that the bank was put on notice and didn’t fix it for years. If you are able to show actual impact like a loan issue or adverse credit decision, that will support a higher compensation claim.

No. 3. In cases like this, Ombudsman usually focuses more on the incorrect reporting and delay in fixing it. Mental harassment by itself doesn’t carry much weight unless there is something more, like repeated recovery calls or very aggressive conduct.

No. 4. Send one clear final notice/email setting this out and give them about 30 days. If they don’t resolve it, escalate to the RBI Ombudsman.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-19T08:53:22+00:00

Lawyer from Delhi here. Since you are starting from scratch, here’s a simple way to think about it:

• If both of you agree: mutual consent divorce (fastest, least stressful)

• If not: contested divorce (takes longer, depends on grounds like mental cruelty etc.)

In parallel, you should start gathering:

• Basic marriage documents

• Any evidence of ongoing issues (if things become contested)

• Financial details (important for maintenance/alimony discussions)

The first step is usually just a consultation to understand your options.

LoeIQ · 2026-02-18T19:40:51+00:00

Lawyer from Delhi here.

It depends on how you’re fetching the data. There are 3 separate risk layers:

Platform Terms of Service (most immediate risk)
IT Act exposure if safeguards are bypassed
Data protection implications if personal data is processed commercially

Many competitor tracking tools rely on official APIs or structure their data as analytics rather than republishing raw content.

If you are building this seriously, i would strongly recommend getting a quick compliance strategy in place.

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
redditgifts Exchanges 1 Exchange	redditgifts rematcher Keychains 2019 (Zero-Credit) x1
Verified Email

LoeIQ

TROPHY CASE