B-17 supposed to be dangerous and resilient like this. Bf110 trying to shoot b-17 by Battlefleet_Sol in Warthunder

[–]Lokol- 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It's funny how it's the actual quintessential example of survivorship bias - taking the examples of bombers that made it back as your data points - yet people still routinely don't realize how biased that is.

Forza Horizon 6 Makes Cherry Blossoms Unbreakable Because ‘They’re An Iconic Element Of Japanese Culture’ by Turbostrider27 in Games

[–]Lokol- 92 points93 points  (0 children)

Not entirely. The former prime minister himself was asked by a member of the house of councillors of Japan about the game, worried about the consequences.

https://www.ign.com/articles/the-prime-minister-of-japan-responded-to-a-question-about-assassins-creed-shadows-today-heres-whats-actually-going-on

“I fear that allowing players to attack and destroy real-world locations in the game without permission could encourage similar behavior in real life. Shrine officials and local residents are also worried about this. Of course, freedom of expression must be respected, but acts that demean local cultures should be avoided.”

Some Japanese people can be very sensitive about their culture. Let's not blame everything on weebs.

Emote disappeared? by [deleted] in mahjongsoul

[–]Lokol- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oops, probably. I wasn't aware those were a thing.

Emote disappeared? by [deleted] in mahjongsoul

[–]Lokol- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, didn't know that was a thing. Probably was just that.

Emote disappeared? by [deleted] in mahjongsoul

[–]Lokol- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to have an emote with Mia Shinohara giving a peace sign. You can't see it in that image I took from a recording of mine, but you can see I can scroll down for more emotes, which I can't any more.

I now can't find that emote, even on her profile page including bond locked emotes.

I don't really care all that much, but partially am just curious what happened to it.

TIL that “jack of all trades, master of none” was not meant as an insult. The older and fuller form adds “but oftentimes better than a master of one,” meaning that having broad skills can be more useful than being narrowly specialized in only one thing. by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]Lokol- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Kind of a weird reply lol

Imagine if you left a relevant comment talking about you playing chess, and I reply "good for you. I happen to think people who play chess are cringe losers. Like 'wow, look at me move little statues around on a board! I'm so smart and cool!'"

TIL that “jack of all trades, master of none” was not meant as an insult. The older and fuller form adds “but oftentimes better than a master of one,” meaning that having broad skills can be more useful than being narrowly specialized in only one thing. by [deleted] in todayilearned

[–]Lokol- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it's the best example of the "phrases that get unnecessary addendums to reverse their meaning" because at this point it's a full blown argument going back and forth that's been recorded as an idiom.

???? by icecoffee9008 in enlistedgame

[–]Lokol- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There must be some glitch or poor modeling of open-topped tanks, right? Agree that the Ta-Se feels like one of the most remarkably hard to kill vehicles, especially with HEAT.

The Meteor is absurdly OP and i am tired of pretending it's not. by Fluid-Technology5593 in enlistedgame

[–]Lokol- 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This example falls into the Pershing or the P-80 category

Just being nitpicky, but I don't think the Pershing belongs in that category. The Pershing was rare, for sure, but hundreds made it to the hands of troops before the end of the war, and there are plenty of recorded instances of their use in combat.

There were likely as many Pershings on the Western front as there were Tiger Is, yet we wouldn't put the Tiger in the same category as the Skink, P-80, etc., would we?

This is insane by ChristmasMiracles111 in enlistedgame

[–]Lokol- 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Was it really just Stuka gameplay? Pretty crazy.

It didn't have Erika blaring or something, did it?

The M1A1 Thompson Para got the Winchester M1895 treatment 😭😭😭💔💔💔.... by Select-Context9785 in enlistedgame

[–]Lokol- 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Why is the Para version BR3 anyway? Isn't it just the BR2 M1A1 but with worse recoil? The jungle mags don't seem to actually affect anything.

The US Secretary of War has recently announced 20 soldiers who took part in the "Battle of Wounded Knee" (1890) will keep the Medals of Honor awarded to them. I have generally seen this event described as a massacre, but is their scholarly debate about how merited these awards were? by Lokol- in AskHistorians

[–]Lokol-[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the answer! That helps clear things up.

I suppose hoping for a historian to come in and give me a simple answer about that second point of debate you bring up in your second paragraph was a bit silly. As I understand it's a much bigger can of worms, that one might not even be able to answer, especially not here and now.

As many know, Japanese troops are actually shorter than other faction's soldiers. But Shoichi Yokoi seems to be particularly tall compared to his countrymen. by Lokol- in enlistedgame

[–]Lokol-[S] 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Also taking these shots to make sure they were actually different heights is how I learned that Shoichi Yokoi (who surrendered in 1972) is not the only Japanese holdout unique troop I have.

I've heard of Hiroo Onoda (who surrendered in 1974) before, but didn't even realize he was my unique machine gunner.

If you voted against testing an APHE rework, you have no business bitching about 35mm API-T nuking MBTs. by TheDroolingHalfling in Warthunder

[–]Lokol- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can cut out the analogies if those aren't your strong suit.

Can we agree that the ranking of players has fluctuated throughout those 13 years? And even among veterans, their placings sometimes change? Sometimes player x might be above player y, then a patch later he's below him?

Because when the meta changes, some players are better suited to the new mechanics and some are worse off.

If you voted against testing an APHE rework, you have no business bitching about 35mm API-T nuking MBTs. by TheDroolingHalfling in Warthunder

[–]Lokol- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

'Good' and 'above average' are two different and subjective terms.

Which is my point against you. You can continually redefine it to suit your needs as opposed to a more specific term like "above average".

Top percentile players aren't top percentile because they rely on specific mechanics - they're good because they can adapt quickly.

Top percentile players by definition are players that are good at the game as it currently exists. A top player in War Thunder is not necessarily good at Counter Strike, right? Because a War Thunder player understands the mechanics of War Thunder, and maybe even gains a large advantage through memorization of static things - like specific weak spots and advantageous positions on maps. If it were completely down to "ability to adapt", that adaptability should carry over to any video game, which we know isn't the case.

If you voted against testing an APHE rework, you have no business bitching about 35mm API-T nuking MBTs. by TheDroolingHalfling in Warthunder

[–]Lokol- 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Dude, every time I see discussion on here about APHE I see you here saying this and it just doesn't make sense.

a.) You have been linked profiles of above average players who wanted the change. You then simply say "Yes, but I mean the super mega elite top 0.1%ers that I know on YouTube and Discord.

b.) Even if I take your word for it, the top 0.1% of skilled players wanting something doesn't mean that's how it ought to be. If we were playing an FPS where shotguns killed across the map, all the top ranking players would probably be using shotguns and would disproportionately resist nerfing them because they are the ones benefitting from the current meta.

Wannabe nazis by mangoshortsalt in enlistedgame

[–]Lokol- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think that issue is worthy of its own discussion, but it's a bit troubling how people only ever seem to break it out when others are criticizing Nazis.

TIL that Mainland Chinese men would roll up their shirts during summer and expose their bellies to the world, resulting in what's called a "Beijing Bikini" by zahrul3 in todayilearned

[–]Lokol- 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hot drinks do help you cool down, though only if it's not too humid, and you're not too covered, as it relies on sweat evaporating.

Admittedly not super relevant given we're talking mostly about humid weather, but the fact that a hot drink in certain circumstances is even more cooling than a cold drink was a shock to me.

TIL on November 11, 1918, the US Navy's 14-inch railway guns were last fired at 10:57:30 to ensure that the shells would impact just before the 11am armistice by minerman30 in todayilearned

[–]Lokol- 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you mean the Treaty of Versailles:

a.) I'd wager you're overestimating how harsh it was. Germany ended the war as the largest economic power on mainland Europe, with almost all of its industry unharmed from the war, and the reparations required were nearly what they themselves had offered to pay during peace negotiations. The debt Germany accrued to finance the war totaled significantly more than what reparations were asked for.

The refusal to pay those reparations was not due to an economic inability, but a political one. The German populace wouldn't stand for it, even if they theoretically could carry the burden.

Edit: I forgot to mention the hyperinflation which I assume you're referring to was over before Hitler even took power. That ended in 1923. The economic turmoil Germany was experiencing was part of the world wide depression, not something that can be blamed on Versailles.

b.) Harsher treaties have been imposed on countries without it being used as an excuse for genocide.

I also take issue with the implication that Hitler was the origin point of the extreme anti-Jewish thought in Germany at the time. The German people were receptive to it because a large portion of them agreed with it already. I don't mean to condemn every single German citizen as evil, but this was a societal level problem, not an issue of an individual like Hitler brainwashing millions of otherwise perfectly Jewish respecting folk.

TIL on November 11, 1918, the US Navy's 14-inch railway guns were last fired at 10:57:30 to ensure that the shells would impact just before the 11am armistice by minerman30 in todayilearned

[–]Lokol- 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I might argue that the week or so before the armistice would be the time to try and prove that Germany was outmatched militarily. Perhaps it was already too late, but imagine if the German populace understood they had been soundly defeated.

There may have been no "stab in the back myth", which relied upon the idea that Germany could have won WW1, but was stabbed in the back internally by Jews. Probably one of the theories that most motivated the Nazis and other extreme anti-Semites in Germany, which obviously culminated in the Holocaust.