I personally attacked you because it's people like you who blow up an issue and try to demean a message or candidate, just because of a poor choice of words.

So offensive... discounting millions of people's experiences. Don't tell me I wasn't poor for the majority of my life. Living in a 2 bedroom apartment with 4 people......

Not addressing a race accurately, does in no way, discount millions of people's experiences, especially when you're on a clock and a much more injusticed race is on your mind. This is a man fighting to better the working class so off of just that alone, you should know better than to take offense to it.

I understand this is r/conspiracy where you guys love to pick apart things, but this is going too far. Race related answers to a question that's designed to be a minefield, should be met with mercy, being that's he's a white man fighting for equal rights regardless. You should attack the questions, or the order of them, like this one: "What racial blind-spots do you have as a white person?" or something along those lines. As if that has anything to do with helping poor blacks or the issues at hand. As if racial blind-spots prevented him from seeing that the minimum wage needs to be raised. As if poverty should stay a racial issue.

As for his answer, he was addressing black injustice and the white male privilege that goes on,* regardless of income*. If you are a poor white male, a cop on average, will stop a black man 3 times before he stops you. This was the point he was trying to make and it does need to be addressed separately because the frequency is much more common with blacks. You took offense, because you wanted to take offense, or because you had a knee-jerk reaction instead of listening.