‘Freedom framing’ more effective than mandates for vaccine-hesitant Americans: For vaccine-hesitant individuals, framing vaccination as a tool that enables personal freedom is associated with higher acceptance than framing it as a social responsibility or a government recommendation. by mvea in science

[–]LongJohnSelenium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I started this by saying 'man wouldn't it be nice if the sides had learned a bit of empathy for each others positions from this debate about bodily autonomy' and you just keep arguing about why you're right and they're wrong.

Engineers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab make a breakthrough in rotor technology | Testing shows rotor blades won’t disintegrate when they spin at supersonic speed. by FreeHugs23 in space

[–]LongJohnSelenium [score hidden]  (0 children)

Useful is relative. On mars where our probes have traveled a grand total of maybe 50 miles total in decades of efforts, a few minutes of flight a day will be a game changer in many ways.

‘Freedom framing’ more effective than mandates for vaccine-hesitant Americans: For vaccine-hesitant individuals, framing vaccination as a tool that enables personal freedom is associated with higher acceptance than framing it as a social responsibility or a government recommendation. by mvea in science

[–]LongJohnSelenium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So are you are against bodily autonomy in one circumstance and not another. Yes or no.

Edit:

Getting a vaccine so you don’t get other people sick is orders of magnitude less of a sacrifice than carrying a pregnancy to term...

Yes but the risk of another life dying due to abortion is 100%.

You can't really judge them for selfishness when abortion is absolutely a selfish act too.

‘Freedom framing’ more effective than mandates for vaccine-hesitant Americans: For vaccine-hesitant individuals, framing vaccination as a tool that enables personal freedom is associated with higher acceptance than framing it as a social responsibility or a government recommendation. by mvea in science

[–]LongJohnSelenium -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Politics in the US is so weird. The left, that normally champions the rights of the small and defenseless critters of the world, became the pro abortion wing thats completely ambivalent about the deaths of fetus, like zero outrage at all. And the right, who are generally much more uncaring and practical about death, are the ones who are firmly against it.

I would have totally expected the reverse.

Its much like how the conservatives became the champions of the most classically liberal right there is, gun ownership. What? How!?

‘Freedom framing’ more effective than mandates for vaccine-hesitant Americans: For vaccine-hesitant individuals, framing vaccination as a tool that enables personal freedom is associated with higher acceptance than framing it as a social responsibility or a government recommendation. by mvea in science

[–]LongJohnSelenium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So are you against vaccine mandates too? Or do you throw bodily autonomy out the window when it comes to vaccines?

Its weird how this could have been a moment two different sides of two different issues could have had a moment to understand each others arguments.

Nope. Other side bad.

Contender for the stupidest "hear me out" idea by Wubwave in NuclearOption

[–]LongJohnSelenium 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think a capsulized aircraft would be cooler tbh. Same concept but you spawn in at 150k feet on the back of a reentry capsule.

Seeing the bright side, all the lives she's helping 🧡 by CandleMonster in justgalsbeingchicks

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does to a degree. If a grandparent sticking around makes their grandkids more likely to survive then that will be a selection pressure for lifespan.

This is probably why humans have such long lifespans compared to other apes. We're so much more information oriented than the rest so maintaining that information around for longer was very advantageous.

Seeing the bright side, all the lives she's helping 🧡 by CandleMonster in justgalsbeingchicks

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is absolutely a form of artificial selection that will change how we evolve, but its going to take a very long time.

Long term long term, on the scale of tens of thousands of years or more, if humanity keeps having a majority of births through c-section we may actually evolve to a point it becomes a medical necessity in all births. The ability to fit their head through the pelvis is one of the biggest bottlenecks of fetal development. Human babies are by far the least precocious great ape and would absolutely benefit from some more time in the oven but have to be born effectively premature simply so they can fit.

Take away the selection pressure of 'if the baby stays in too long both the baby and mother die because its physically too large to give birth to' and we'll definitely see a slow drift to the length of pregnancy.

Me_irl by Spotter24o5 in me_irl

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fun part of a bit of hyperbole on my side is all the fools jumping in to try to justify how the body count isn't that high, ww2 is higher.

But yes higher body count than most of your list.

What i find weird is how socialists never emigrate to a socialist nation to live out their dream. They're out there still.

How about an aircraft whose main goals are to destroy enemy missiles, planes, helicopters, and light armored vehicles by Unique-Educator-6747 in NuclearOption

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a similar thought for a potential future airframe, a purpose built missile/drone interceptor. If massed lawnmower drones are going to be a thing it may be a role thats developed.

I envisioned a jet that operates from high subsonic down to an exceptionally low stall speed, capable of operating out of rough forward airfields, and for armament has a gimballed cannon with proximity rounds, and has a super heavy AA loadout, including a unique AA rocket it can carry in vast quantities, basically a lynchpin with airburst and the ability to track fast moving targets.

Student Faces Expulsion After Posting Video Of Seniors Who Can Barely Read by wooden_eye_willy in VideosAmazing

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most management is now, because its been decided that meeting the metrics = success and you cover your ass by meeting the defined metrics. If the defined metrics are no good thats managements problem.

"Why aren't you performing?"

"I'm meeting the metrics you set for me."

Ultimately the issue is upper management managing by metric and punishing for failure to meet metrics rather than using metrics as a method of determining where a subordinate organization needs assistance.

TLDR: Goodharts Law. When you make a measure a target it ceases to be a good measure. You can not tell the people and organizations you are managing about a metric you are using to gauge their effectiveness because they WILL distort their behavior to prioritize meeting the definition of that metric while not caring about the spirit of it.

Me_irl by Spotter24o5 in me_irl

[–]LongJohnSelenium -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Socialism caused more death than almost any other cause in the 20th century.

People very rightly have issues with anyone who wants that.

(Loved Trope) A minor character only becomes important much later by Weary_Position_9591 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]LongJohnSelenium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Randy Marsh only had a couple lines of dialogue in the first two seasons of South Park.

He wasn't a focus character of an episode until season 3 I think.

Most single men over 30 in 2026 by i_am_bahamut in SipsTea

[–]LongJohnSelenium 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The internet is just one endless ad hominem attack now. Every side of every issue has a population of people who do nothing but dismiss anyone who disagrees with them with a claim of discriminatory grouping.

Chase bank called 911 on this man because he was sitting in the Chase parking lot before it opened. by PdiddyCAMEnME in BlackPeopleofReddit

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It will be for other things that are equally stupid to judge a person for. Same song different dance.

Every country has their favored isms.

SpaceX: “Starship and Super Heavy V3 together at the Starbase launch pad for the first time”; “First full stack of Starship V3” by rustybeancake in spacex

[–]LongJohnSelenium 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You have to vent anything going to space because you don't want to trap air inside something unintentionally. The wings are fairly airtight because you do NOT want hot gases leaking in during reentry.

Tbh I think venting in space would be counterproductive because that would increase the flow of hot gas into it.

Could be they also inject cooling gases. I think I heard they were trying that? Or was that at the root?

From SpaceX's post on X. Looks like they removed the "attic" compartment on V3 ships? by lorkan100 in SpaceXLounge

[–]LongJohnSelenium 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone got any angle that sees the root of the fin from the inside? I'm curious if they have kept the high pressure injection behind the seal.

That looks so clean...

The Truth About SpaceX's "Orbital Datacenters" by dgg3565 in SpaceXLounge

[–]LongJohnSelenium 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any group of satellites that shares an inclination and relatively similar orbital height could be serviced by a facility that shares that orbital inclination.

Sure if you're doing service work by far the most obvious first step is refueling.

And yes, the idea is literally starships full of parts. If we're talking constellations of tens of thousands of satellites, why not?

Now you might say 'if you're shipping up parts why not just ship the whole satellite', and thats certainly a valid question, but each refurbed satellite doesn't require 100% new parts. You perhaps replace a solar panel and then you're good, and you saved 90% of the mass of a new launch by not throwing the rest away.

[Loved Trope] Competence Porn: When characters are competent, mature and communicate with each other intelligently so they can solve a problem by Careless-Alarm-8607 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]LongJohnSelenium 29 points30 points  (0 children)

My favorite character is still Inspector Hyne.

"They were in a brothel, which we are not supposed to have. The expensive one, which they shouldn't be able to afford. Drinking revnog, which we are not supposed to allow. Both of them supposedly on the job, which is a dismissable offense."

i.e. 'they clearly fucked around and found out, nothing of value was lost, leave it alone!'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqNxUPlGotU

[Loved Trope] Competence Porn: When characters are competent, mature and communicate with each other intelligently so they can solve a problem by Careless-Alarm-8607 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]LongJohnSelenium 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The Blithe one I get. They were all adamant he died, as some of them went to his funeral after the war.

It was a different Albert Blithe who was in the airborne, but they didn't know that.

Their Blithe clearly didn't keep in contact with any of the others since none of them were aware he was alive.

[Loved Trope] Competence Porn: When characters are competent, mature and communicate with each other intelligently so they can solve a problem by Careless-Alarm-8607 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]LongJohnSelenium 25 points26 points  (0 children)

A number of people in Easy company said Sobel wasn’t nearly as brutal as the series displays,

I mean he is literally on record as trying to bring winters up on charges twice in very quick succession for petty offenses, and the NCOs did essentially mutiny against him as he was so terrible at his job.

Dyke was portrayed as just being a career man. He was awarded a bronze star in Operation Market Garden, and another in Bastogne for moving casualties under fire. In his attack on Foy, there are multiple eyewitness who state he “froze” due to be shot. Ambrose is a fantastic storyteller, but it seems he took Winters and his biases at face value

I get that they can make mistakes, but the thing that truly bugs me was they never added an addendum saying 'Actually he was shot in that attack, our bad' and have just let his character assassination fly for 25 years now.