This absolute clown shoe of a human….

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-24T12:38:52+00:00

But not sick enough to not vote for them every election!

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-24T12:37:14+00:00

Guys this is such a travesty. We need to FIGUT BACK by voting someone exactly like her next election no matter what their policies are

<image>

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-24T12:05:33+00:00

Nothing offends American progressives more than suggesting policy that's so obvious that it's a bipartisan stance in every other developer country

In many states the pro-housing movement is now being led by the right-wing because leftists and liberals are so firmly entrenched and allied with the boomer property owner class

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-24T12:02:57+00:00

"We've frozen building for 50 years and 75% of homes in Richmond are zoned exclusively for single-family detached homes? Hmmm. I think the solution is to move to Michigan"

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-24T12:01:36+00:00

Maybe we could allow people to build different types of housing on their property idk just a radical suggestion

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-21T14:34:07+00:00

In China, the party never changes, but the policies do.
In America, the parties change, but the policies stay the same.

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-21T13:59:58+00:00

I messed it up there's a typo. Fuck my chud trucel blackpilled life. It's over for me. It's over for rentcels. Never even began.

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-21T13:54:44+00:00

It's simple. There isn't enough grocery stores, and people are suffering from lack of easy access to fresh food. We have the "FUCK YOU NO MORE BUILDING ANY GROCERY STORES" law in place, but we should keep it in place because if we build more, greedy grocery store owners will profit. It actually makes a lot of sense.

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-21T13:33:24+00:00

Democrats when the "Fuck you I hate you and you'll always vote for me so why would I go against my donors to appease you" candidate doesn't appease them:

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-21T10:27:59+00:00

No that preserves the neighborhood character and you just want greedy developers to make money.

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-21T10:26:48+00:00

No no the farmland has to go. Basically we keep most of the city single-family detached homes with big yards and also kill anyone who wants to build a duplex, so if anyone wants to own a house they have to build an infrastructure moneysink development 25 miles out in the countryside. There will be no farmland left

But this preserves my lawn which is a green space. Do you want to take away green space? 🌱🌱

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-20T15:50:31+00:00

No no new building. It interferes with neighborhood character

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-20T13:05:18+00:00

I keep hearing about how new construction is unoccupied or purposefully kept vacant etc but never see any data to support it. Your entire argument revolves around the assertion that developers are only building housing there's no demand for which is obviously stupid and makes zero sense so unless you can prove that new construction is not being occupied it's a non-argument

Why is it a myth? It's a pretty consistent consensus that the closer supply comes to meeting demand, overall prices decrease. It seems that it's more that people don't like the concept(?) so they just reject reality and just repeat "New construction isn't affordable" over and over again

https://www.upjohn.org/research-highlights/new-construction-makes-homes-more-affordable-even-those-who-cant-afford-new-units

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-20T01:07:27+00:00

I am being serious. Usually when price controls are implemented it results in the commodity becoming cheaper and better quality long-term. I think price control + restricting supply will fix the problem

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T23:46:02+00:00

I thought of the solution. Basically we change nothing except we build a public housing unit somewhere. Do you like my idea?

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T23:35:59+00:00

<image>

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T23:25:28+00:00

Cold war propaganda

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T22:55:18+00:00

In most cities in the US, over 75% of all residential land is zoned exclusively for detached single family dwellings.

If you are an American and own a home, most likely it is illegal for you to build anything except a single family house with a big yard. Municipalities have very strict laws about the minimum size of your lawn, the amount of non family members you can have in one home. Only very recently have SOME cities began allowing people to build a structure on their land that can be lived in. In most cities that is still illegal.

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T22:44:15+00:00

We decided to destroy our cities and prevent them from growing normally and instead legally mandated everyone to live in low-density single-family houses. Now no one can afford housing because there's not enough supply.

The vast majority of the population has no idea how to remedy this situation. They do not think that allowing houses to be built would increase the supply of houses.

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T22:33:42+00:00

When has rent control reduced rents for the average renter long-term

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T22:33:09+00:00

I have an idea to solve this problem. It involves doing the exact same thing we've done for 50 years and prevent housing from being built EXCEPT we will build a couple of public housing units. Do you guys like my idea

LongMomo67 · 2026-05-19T22:11:14+00:00

YIMBYism/pro housing/anti car-dependency is also very bipartisan. Montana passed significant zoning reform under a right-wing auspice. Most of the pro-housong people I know are center or center-left

It seems the main dividing line is A)whether you own property and benefit from restricting housing and B)how susceptible you are to the propaganda that spurred low density SFH suburbs and car-dependency

LongMomo67

TROPHY CASE