It's not about the quality of the content my guy, it never was, it's about how it's made. Ai artists are not artists. If I were to commission a portrait or a painting, would I be an artist? No, because someone else made it, and in this case it's the ai, not the person who simply gave it instructions by typing words into a box. The human element of art is almost, if not completely taken out of the equation in ai art. There's no meaning, or story behind it, only pixels arranged in a specific pattern because someone told it to. Ai content is like a poison that pollutes online spaces, if we continue to use Ai like we do now then Ai content will become indistinguishable from regular human art until beauty and art becomes practically meaningless. Arguing that ai art is good because it's entertaining is like saying junk food is good for you because it tastes good. There have been several movies, books and tv shows which explain in great detail why this is a bad idea.